套扎术联合不同聚桂醇硬化疗法治疗Ⅰ~Ⅲ度内痔的效果和安全性对比OA
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of band ligation combined with different lauromacrogol sclerotherapy regimens in the treatment of grade Ⅰ-Ⅲ internal hemorrhoids
目的 对比套扎术联合聚桂醇泡沫硬化剂与液体硬化剂治疗Ⅰ~Ⅲ度内痔的临床疗效及安全性,为临床治疗方案选择提供循证依据.方法 选取2022年1月至2023年12月右江民族医学院附属医院收治的82例Ⅰ~Ⅲ度内痔患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表分为泡沫疗法组与液体疗法组,各41例.两组均接受内镜下套扎术治疗,在此基础上液体疗法组注射聚桂醇液体硬化剂,泡沫疗法组注射聚桂醇泡沫硬化剂(液气比1∶4).比较两组整体及不同分度内痔的治疗效果、注射总点数、硬化剂用量、术后出血情况、术后24 h肛周疼痛程度、治疗后1个月肛肠动力学指标[直肠最大耐受量(MTV)、肛管最大收缩压(MSP)、直肠静息压(RRP)]、肛门功能评分、并发症发生率、住院费用、住院时间,以及术后6个月、术后12个月的复发率与生活质量评分.结果 泡沫疗法组整体治疗效果优于液体疗法组,注射总点数、硬化剂总量均少于液体疗法组(P<0.001);按内痔分度分层分析,Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ度内痔亚组中泡沫疗法组疗效均优于同分度液体疗法组,硬化剂用量及注射点数均更低(P<0.05).泡沫疗法组术后出血情况、术后24 h肛周疼痛程度均轻于液体疗法组(P<0.05).治疗后1个月,泡沫疗法组MTV、MSP低于液体疗法组,RRP高于液体疗法组(P<0.05);肛门控便功能评分、肛门感觉功能评分均低于液体疗法组(P<0.001).泡沫疗法组并发症总发生率为7.32%,低于液体疗法组的24.39%(P=0.034).两组住院时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但泡沫疗法组住院费用低于液体疗法组(P<0.001).术后6个月、术后12个月随访显示,泡沫疗法组复发率均低于液体疗法组,生活质量评分均高于液体疗法组(P<0.05或0.001).结论 套扎术联合聚桂醇泡沫硬化剂治疗Ⅰ~Ⅲ度内痔疗效确切,可减少硬化剂用量,减轻术后出血与疼痛,改善肛肠功能,降低并发症发生率与医疗成本,远期复发率更低,安全性和经济效益更优,值得临床推广应用.
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of band ligation combined with lauromacrogol foam sclerosant versus liquid sclerosant in the treatment of grade Ⅰ-Ⅲ internal hemorrhoids,so as to provide evidence-based basis for clinical treatment regimen selection.Methods A total of 82 patients with grade Ⅰ-Ⅲ internal hemorrhoids admitted to Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities from January 2022 to December 2023 were selected as research subjects.They were divided into foam therapy group and liquid therapy group using a random number table,with 41 cases in each group.Both groups were given endoscopic band ligation.On this basis,the liquid therapy group were injected with lauromacrogol liquid sclerosant,while the foam therapy group were injected with lauromacrogol foam scle-rosant(liquid-to-gas ratio 1∶4).The treatment outcomes of overall and different grades of internal hemorrhoids,total num-ber of injection points,sclerosant dosage,postoperative bleeding,perianal pain degree at 24 h after surgery,anorectal dynamic parameters(maximum tolerated volume of rectum[MTV],maximum systolic pressure of anal canal[MSP],and rectal resting pressure[RRP])at 1 month after treatment,anal function scores,incidence of complications,hospitalization costs,length of hospital stay,as well as recurrence rate and quality of life scores at 6 months and 12 months after surgery were compared between the two groups.Results The overall treatment effect of the foam therapy group was better than that of the liquid therapy group,and the total number of injection points and total sclerosant dosage were less than those of the liquid therapy group(P<0.001).Stratified analysis by internal hemorrhoid grade showed that in grade Ⅰ,Ⅱ,and Ⅲinternal hemorrhoid subgroups,the efficacy of the foam therapy group was better than that of the liquid therapy group with the same grade,and the sclerosant dosage and number of injection points were lower(P<0.05).Postoperative bleeding and perianal pain at 24 h after surgery in the foam therapy group were milder than those in the liquid therapy group(P<0.05).At 1 month after treatment,MTV and MSP in the foam therapy group were lower than those in the liquid therapy group,while RRP was higher than that in the liquid therapy group(P<0.05).The anal continence function score and anal sensory func-tion score in the foam therapy group were lower than those in the liquid therapy group(P<0.001).The total incidence of complications in the foam therapy group was 7.32%,which was lower than that in the liquid therapy group(24.39%)(P=0.034).There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay between the two groups(P>0.05),but the hospitaliza-tion cost in the foam therapy group was lower than that in the liquid therapy group(P<0.001).Follow-up at 6 months and 12 months after surgery showed that the recurrence rate of the foam therapy group was lower than that of the liquid therapy group,and the quality of life score was higher than that of the liquid therapy group(P<0.05 or 0.001).Conclusion Band ligation combined with lauromacrogol foam sclerosant has definite efficacy in the treatment of grade Ⅰ-Ⅲ internal hemor-rhoids.It can reduce sclerosant dosage,alleviate postoperative bleeding and pain,improve anorectal function,reduce the incidence of complications and medical costs,and has a lower long-term recurrence rate,with better safety and economic benefits,which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
邓肖霞;李依柯;马心连;苏建伟
右江民族医学院附属医院消化内科,广西百色 533000||右江民族医学院研究生学院,广西百色 533000右江民族医学院附属医院消化内科,广西百色 533000||右江民族医学院研究生学院,广西百色 533000右江民族医学院附属医院消化内科,广西百色 533000||右江民族医学院研究生学院,广西百色 533000右江民族医学院附属医院消化内科,广西百色 533000
医药卫生
内痔套扎术聚桂醇泡沫硬化剂液体硬化剂疗效安全性
internal hemorrhoidsband ligationlauromacrogolfoam sclerosantliquid sclerosantefficacysafety
《右江医学》 2026 (5)
469-475,7
2022年百色市科学研究与技术开发计划项目(百科20224111)
评论