首页|期刊导航|信息资源管理学报|技术赋能与内在自主:AI渗透下信息资源管理学科话语自主性分析

技术赋能与内在自主:AI渗透下信息资源管理学科话语自主性分析OACHSSCD

Technological Empowerment and Intrinsic Autonomy:An Exploratory Analysis of Discourse Autonomy in the Discipline of Information Resources Management in the AI Era

中文摘要英文摘要

以信息资源管理研究问题的四维分类体系为框架,针对 2016-2026 年 CNKI 与 WoS 双语料库中信息资源管理领域核心文献,从概念自主性、议题自主性与框架自主性三个层面,对 AI 渗透下中国信息资源管理学科话语自主性的分布特征进行初步测量与探索,研究采用 LLM 分类、跨语言词嵌入与话语框架编码等方法开展.主要结论:第一,AI 渗透存在结构性差异,技术方法型渗透最深,资源组织型本土自主性最强.第二,概念自主性呈现"技术同构、治理分化"的特征,治理制度型与资源组织型构成本土概念高地.第三,议题趋同度表现为三类领域高度同步、资源组织型显著异质的非均衡格局;第四,框架自主性为中国信息资源管理话语核心优势,中英文分别形成复合型社会技术范式与单向度技术工具范式.研究发现揭示了 AI 渗透下中国信息资源管理学科话语自主性的总体规律,可为理解本土学科在全球技术浪潮中的差异化话语建构逻辑提供参考,并为话语自主性的计量化研究提供方法论探索.

Based on the four-dimensional classification framework of Information Resources Management(IRM)research questions,this study targets core literature in the IRM field both from the CNKI and WoS between 2016 and 2026.From three dimensions—conceptual autonomy,topic autonomy,and framework autonomy—it preliminarily ex-plores the distributional characteristics of discourse autonomy in China's IRM discipline under AI penetration.Emplo-ying methods such as Large Language Model(LLM)classification,cross-lingual word embeddings,and discourse framework coding,the study draws the following conclusions.Firstly,structural differences in AI penetration:the tech-nological-methodological type experiences the deepest penetration,while the resource-organizational type exhibits the strongest local self-sufficiency.Secondly,conceptual autonomy presents the characteristics of"technological isomor-phism and governance differentiation"with the governance-institutional and resource-organizational types constituting the high ground of local concepts.Thirdly,topic convergence shows an unbalanced pattern where three fields are high-ly synchronized,whereas the resource-organizational field is significantly heterogeneous.Fourthly,framework autono-my emerges as the core advantage of Chinese IRM discourse,with Chinese and English literature forming a composite socio-technical paradigm and a one-dimensional technological-instrumental paradigm,respectively.This study re-veals the dialectical unity law of discourse autonomy in China's IRM discipline under the impact of AI,providing a methodological exploration for the quantitative study of disciplinary discourse autonomy,and offering preliminary em-pirical references for understanding the differentiated discourse construction logic of local disciplines under AI penetra-tion in IRM.

张洋;高云芸;武承豪;侯剑华

中山大学信息管理学院,广州,510006中山大学信息管理学院,广州,510006中山大学信息管理学院,广州,510006中山大学信息管理学院,广州,510006

社会科学

信息资源管理自主知识体系AI4IRMIRM4AI学科话语自主性

Information resources managementIndependent knowledge systemAI4IRMIRM4AIDisciplinary discourse autonomy

《信息资源管理学报》 2026 (3)

104-119,16

本文系教育部哲学社会科学研究重大专项项目"AI时代中国信息资源管理学科自主知识体系发展路径研究"(2025JZDZ102)和教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助重大项目"科学知识扩散论"(24JHQ018)的研究成果之一.(This paper is supported by the Major Special Project of Philosophy and Social Science Research of the Ministry of Education"Research on the Development Path of the Independent Knowl-edge System of China's Information Resources Management Discipline in the AI Era"(2025JZDZ102),and the Major Project of Post-funded Re-search on Philosophy and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education"Theory of Scientific Knowledge Diffusion"(24JHQ018).)

10.13365/j.jirm.2026.03.104

评论