基于污水处理成本分摊的中国湿地水质净化服务单价核算OA
Calculation of unit price for water purification service of wetlands in China based on sewage treatment cost allocation
针对当前直接采用《中华人民共和国环境保护税法》税率作为替代成本所存在的理论偏差与实践挑战,构建了一个多方法的污水处理运行成本分摊框架,旨在核算更接近真实治理成本的污染物去除单价.基于2015-2023 年全国集中式污水处理厂的宏观数据,综合运用特征化因子分配法、综合营养状态指数分配法、等标负荷分配法与环境保护税污染当量分配法,测算了 CODCr、TN、TP 的单位去除量运行费.结果表明:与环境保护税污染当量法的分配结果相比,其他方法均揭示出现行环境保护税标准严重低估了 TN 和 TP 的净化价值;以等标负荷分配法(TP 非湖库限值)为基础进行优化,确定了 CODCr、TN 和 TP 的治理成本分摊比例(25%、55%、20%),并进一步推算出2023 年湿地生态系统净化单位质量 CODCr、TN 和 TP 的功能单价分别为 3.3、59.3、167.3 元/kg.该定价体系基于中国实际污水处理运营成本,克服了当前利用环境保护税率在生态服务估值上的局限性,可为生态产品总值核算、生态补偿标准制定及环境保护税制优化提供精准的科学依据.
Against the theoretical limitations and practical challenges of directly adopting tax rates specified in the Environmental Protection Tax Law of People's Republic of China as substitution costs,this study establishes a multi-method framework for apportioning the operating costs of wastewater treatment,aiming to calculate pollutant removal unit costs that more closely reflect actual abatement costs.Using nationwide macro-statistical data of centralized wastewater treatment plants from 2015 to 2023,the unit operating costs for removing CODCr,TN and TP are quantified via four approaches:characterization factor method,comprehensive trophic state index method,equivalent pollution load method,and environmental protection tax(EPT)pollution equivalent method.The results indicate that,compared with the cost allocation derived from EPT pollution equivalent method,all alternative methods reveal that the prevailing EPT criteria substantially underestimate the purification value of TN and TP.Optimized based on the equivalent pollution load method(using non-lake/reservoir limit values for TP),the cost apportionment ratios for CODCr,TN and TP are set at 25%,55%and 20%,respectively.Accordingly,the 2023 unit prices for wetland purification service are calculated as 3.3 CNY/kg for CODCr,59.3 CNY/kg for TN and 167.3 CNY/kg for TP.Developed on basis of actual operating expenditure of domestic wastewater treatment facilities,the proposed pricing system overcomes current limitations of using environmental protection tax rates in ecosystem service valuation and provides robust scientific support for gross ecosystem product(GEP)accounting,eco-compensation standard setting and EPT environmental reform.
王寿兵;张雨轩;张云楚;刘金会;赵春枝;范继军
复旦大学环境科学与工程系复旦大学环境科学与工程系复旦大学环境科学与工程系复旦大学环境科学与工程系复旦大学环境科学与工程系复旦大学环境科学与工程系
湿地生态系统净化服务单价确定成本分摊替代成本法环境保护税
wetland ecosystempurification serviceunit price determinationcost allocationsubstitution cost methodenvironmental protection tax
《水资源保护》 2026 (3)
209-217,9
国家自然科学基金面上项目(52270179)
评论