基于DFA-灰色聚类模型的亚高山草甸风电场土地损毁评价OA
Land damage assessment of a subalpine meadow wind farm based on DFA-gray clustering model
[目的]构建亚高山草甸风电场土地损毁评价模型并开展实证研究,以期为该区域和其他风电场建设项目土地损毁区域的精准识别和评价提供理论依据和技术参考.[方法]以位于云南省寻甸县高本山的亚高山草甸风电场为例,选取17个评价指标(土壤要素10个、损毁要素7个),基于Delphi-Fuzzy-AHP(以下简称为DFA)方法确定指标权重,并结合灰色聚类法建立可能度函数,通过观测值计算7个评价单元(一期风机区2个,二期风机区2个,弃渣场,采石场,原地貌)的可能度函数值,最终通过比较系数大小,确定各评价单元的土地损毁程度分级.[结果]①损毁要素权重(0.642 0)显著高于土壤要素(0.358 0);损毁要素核心因子为损毁面坡长(0.183 2)与植被覆盖度(0.167 6),反映其对工程安全与水土流失的直接影响;土壤要素中土壤容重(0.069 5)与有机质含量(0.050 4)权重最高,主因施工导致土壤结构变化与肥力下降.②灰色聚类评价显示,一期工程损毁程度为中度(Ⅲ级),二期风机区为极强度(Ⅴ级),弃渣场为强度(Ⅳ级),采石场为剧烈(Ⅵ级),原地貌为轻度(Ⅱ级).③损毁程度差异源于施工扰动强度与修复周期:一期工程因表层土壤保存与自然恢复时间长,生态修复效果较好;二期工程扰动面积大且竣工时间短,植被恢复滞后.[结论]目前,该风电场建设土地损毁较为严重,其土地损毁以施工扰动为主导,损毁要素的高权重凸显其对工程安全与生态风险的优先性.研究结果也验证了DFA-灰色聚类模型在风电场生态修复与管理中的适用性.
[Objective]A land damage assessment model for subalpine meadow wind farms was developed,and empirical research was conducted in order to provide a theoretical basis and technical reference for the precise identification and evaluation of land damage areas in this area and other wind farm construction projects.[Methods]A subalpine meadow wind farm located on Gaoben Mountain in Xundian County,Yunnan Province,was taken as an example.Seventeen evaluation indicators(10 soil-related and 7 damage-related)were selected.The indicator weights were determined using the Delphi-Fuzzy-AHP(hereafter referred to as DFA)method.A possibility function was established by integrating it with the grey clustering method.Observed values were used to calculate the possibility function values of seven evaluation units(two units in the phase Ⅰ wind turbine zone,two units in the phase Ⅱ wind turbine zone,a waste dump,a quarry and the original topography).Finally,by comparing the magnitude of the coefficients,the land damage severity grades for each evaluation unit were determined.[Results]① The weight of damage factors(0.642 0)was significantly higher than that of soil factors(0.358 0).The core damage factors were slope length of the damaged surface(0.183 2)and vegetation coverage(0.167 6),reflecting their direct influence on engineering safety and soil erosion.Among soil factors,soil bulk density(0.069 5)and organic matter content(0.050 4)had the highest weights,mainly due to soil structure change and fertility decline caused by construction disturbance.② Grey clustering evaluation showed that the damage degree of the phase Ⅰ wind turbine zone was moderate(grade Ⅲ),that of the phase Ⅱ wind turbine zone was very strong(grade Ⅴ),that of the waste dump was strong(grade Ⅳ),that of the quarry was severe(gradeⅥ),and that of the original topography was light(grade Ⅱ).③ The difference in land damage degree resulted from construction disturbance intensity and restoration cycle.The phase Ⅰ project achieved better ecological restoration because surface soil was preserved and natural recovery time was longer,whereas the phase Ⅱ project involved a larger disturbance area and a shorter time since completion,resulting in delayed vegetation recovery.[Conclusion]Currently,land damage caused by wind farm construction is relatively serious,and the damage is dominated by construction disturbance.The high weights of damage factors highlight their priority for engineering safety and ecological risk.The results also verify the applicability of the DFA-grey clustering model in ecological restoration and management of wind farms.
刘梓欣;杨慧杰;金千晖;廖一倩;尹菁;陈平平;张耿杰;张辅霞
云南农业大学 资源与环境学院 云南省耕地培育与产能提升重点实验室,云南 昆明 650201云南农业大学 资源与环境学院 云南省耕地培育与产能提升重点实验室,云南 昆明 650201云南农业大学 资源与环境学院 云南省耕地培育与产能提升重点实验室,云南 昆明 650201云南农业大学 资源与环境学院 云南省耕地培育与产能提升重点实验室,云南 昆明 650201云南农业大学 资源与环境学院 云南省耕地培育与产能提升重点实验室,云南 昆明 650201中国电建集团昆明勘测设计研究院有限公司,云南 昆明 650051云南农业大学 资源与环境学院 云南省耕地培育与产能提升重点实验室,云南 昆明 650201||云南农业大学教务处,云南 昆明 650201||云南农业大学 云南省智慧环境国际联合研发中心,云南 昆明 650201云南农业大学 云南省智慧环境国际联合研发中心,云南 昆明 650201
资源环境
风电场亚高山草甸土地损毁评价Delphi-Fuzzy-AHP(DFA)灰色聚类法
wind farmsubalpine meadowland damage assessmentDelphi-Fuzzy-AHP(DFA)grey clustering method
《水土保持通报》 2026 (3)
235-246,12
云南省水利科技项目"亚高山草甸植被及工程扰动影响研究"(2023BG204001-01)国家重点研发计划(2024YFD1700104)"云南省兴滇英才支持计划"青年人才(YNWR-QNBJ-2018-338)云南省教育厅项目(2022J0300)
评论