首页|期刊导航|临床神经外科杂志|控制减压技术对外伤性急性弥漫性脑肿胀患者预后的影响——一项回顾性队列研究

控制减压技术对外伤性急性弥漫性脑肿胀患者预后的影响——一项回顾性队列研究OA

Effect of controlled decompression technique on the prognosis of posttraumatic acute diffuse brain swelling—a retrospective cohort study

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 探讨控制减压技术对外伤性急性弥漫性脑肿胀(PADBS)患者预后的影响.方法 采用回顾性队列研究分析2015 年1 月—2025 年7 月联勤保障部队第九〇四医院收治的 353 例 PADBS 患者的临床、影像学和颅内压(ICP)监测资料.采用格拉斯哥预后扩展量表(GOSE)评价预后,5~8 分为预后良好.结果 共纳入353 例 PADBS 患者,根据术中是否采用控制减压技术分为控制减压组和非控制减压组,控制减压组213 例,其中122 例放置组织型 ICP 监测,91 例放置脑室型 ICP 监测,术前 GCS3~8 分 162 例,GCS 9~12 分51 例,脑疝124 例;非控制减压组140 例,其中29 例放置组织型ICP 监测,29 例放置脑室型ICP 监测,82例未放置 ICP 监测,术前 GCS3~8 分107 例,GCS 9~12 分33 例,脑疝76 例.随访6 个月以上,控制减压组预后良好率56.3%,高于非控制减压组38.6%(P=0.001);控制减压组30 d 全因死亡率7.5%明显低于非控制减压组12.1%,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).两组单因素分析显示,与非控制减压组相比,控制减压组年龄<60 岁、全脑型脑肿胀、急诊手术、去骨瓣减压、使用组织型 ICP 和脑室型 ICP 的比例显著增高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).修正 Poisson 回归显示,在校正年龄、脑肿胀类型、急诊手术、去骨瓣减压、ICP 类型后结果发现,与非控制减压技术相比,采用控制减压技术显著改善 PADBS 患者预后,具有统计学意义(RR=1.953,95%CI=1.438~2.654,P<0.001).结论 控制减压技术能显著改善 PADBS 患者的预后.

Objective To investigate the effect of controlled decompressive technique on the prognosis of patients with posttraumatic acute diffuse brain swelling(PADBS).Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical,imaging,and intracranial pressure(ICP)monitoring data of 353 PADBS patients admitted to 904 Hospital of PLA Logistics Joint Support Force from January 2015 to July 2025.The prognosis was assessed using the Glasgow outcome scale-extended(GOSE),with a score of 5-8 indicating a favorable outcome.Results A total of 353 PADBS patients were enrolled and divided into a controlled decompression group and a non-controlled decompression group based on whether controlled decompression techniques were employed during surgery.The controlled decompression group comprised 213 cases,among which 122 were equipped with tissue-type ICP monitoring and 91 with ventricular-type ICP monitoring,preoperative GCS scores ranged from 3-8 in 162 cases,9-12 in 51 cases,and 124 cases presented with brain herniation.The non-controlled decompression group included 140 cases,with 29 cases receiving tissue-type ICP monitoring,29 cases with ventricular-type ICP monitoring,and 82 cases without ICP monitoring,preoperative GCS scores ranged from 3-8 in 107 cases,9-12 in 33 cases,and 76 cases exhibited brain herniation.At a follow-up of over 6 months,the controlled decompression group demonstrated a favorable prognosis rate of 56.3%,significantly higher than the non-controlled decompression group(38.6%,P=0.001).However,the 30-day all-cause mortality rate was 7.5%in the controlled decompression group,which was markedly lower than the non-controlled decompression group(12.1%),though the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Univariate analysis of both groups revealed that,compared to the non-controlled decompression group,the controlled decompression group had significantly higher proportions of patients aged<60 years,generalized cerebral edema,emergency surgery,decompressive craniectomy,tissue-type ICP,and ventricular-type ICP(P<0.05).Adjusted for age,type of cerebral edema,emergency surgery,decompressive craniectomy,and ICP type,modified Poisson regression model demonstrated that controlled decompression significantly improved patient outcomes compared to non-controlled decompression(RR=1.953,95%CI=1.438-2.654,P<0.001).Conclusions The controlled decompression technique can effectively improve the prognosis of PADBS patients.

徐小梅;胡帅;李雯;蒋超;杨理坤;王守森;王玉海

214000 无锡,中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇四医院神经外科214000 无锡,中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇四医院神经外科214000 无锡,中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇四医院神经外科214000 无锡,中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇四医院神经外科214000 无锡,中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇四医院神经外科中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇〇医院神经外科214000 无锡,中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇四医院神经外科

医药卫生

创伤性脑损伤外伤性急性弥漫性脑肿胀控制减压技术颅内压监测去骨瓣减压术格拉斯哥预后扩展量表

traumatic brain injuryposttraumatic acute diffuse brain swellingcontrolled decompression techniqueintracranial pressure monitoringdecompressive craniectomyglasgow outcome scale-extended

《临床神经外科杂志》 2026 (3)

278-284,7

江苏省卫健委重点科研项目(K2019018)无锡市科技发展资金项目(Y20222025)

10.3969/j.issn.1672-7770.2026.03.007

评论