辨疑如何可能OACHSSCD

How is Critical Inquiry Possible

中文摘要英文摘要

欧阳修解《易》以"问答体"为核心言说策略,突破了汉唐注疏体范式,推动了宋代经学的疑古革新与义理转向.从《易或问》诸篇到《易童子问》,其问答体呈现出三重思想突破:其一,以"或问—对答"祛除占筮神秘色彩,确立《周易》"人事大本"的核心旨归及其发生流变的历史逻辑;其二,以"童问—师答"激活理性思辨,通过辨析矛盾、廓清概念边界,重构卦义的辨证逻辑;其三,以辨伪性问答解构《系辞》等文本权威,提出"取其是而舍其非"的批判继承原则.这一体式创新既呼应庆历科举"求大义"的思潮,又为理学兴起提供方法论启示,体现了文体策略与思想变革的深层互动.

Ouyang Xiu's interpretation of the Book of Changes adopts the question-and-answer form as its core discursive strategy,breaking through the exegetical paradigm of the Han and Tang dynasties.It advances the critical re-examination of classical studies and the turn toward philosophical reasoning in the Song Dynasty.As reflected in his works from the Yi Huo Wen to Yi Tongzi Wen,his question-and-answer form embodies three key intellectual breakthroughs:First,through"hypothetical questions and responses",he demystified divinatory practices and established the"primacy of human affairs"as the core hermeneutic principle,while reconstructing the historical logic of the formation and transmission of classical texts.Second,via"pupil-and-master dialogue",he activated rational inquiry,clarified conceptual boundaries and advanced dialectical reasoning by resolving textual contradictions.Third,by employing critical questioning,he deconstructed the authority of texts such as the Xici,proposing the principle of"adopting what is correct and dis-carding what is erroneous"when engaging with disputed passages.This stylistic innovation not only aligns with the Qingli Imperial Examination reform's emphasis on broader principles,but also provides a methodological frame-work for the rise of Neo-Confucianism,thereby highlighting the profound interplay between literary strategy and in-tellectual transformation.

黄小珠

上海交通大学 人文学院,上海 200240

社会科学

欧阳修《易》学问答策略疑经辨伪人事大本庆历学术

Ouyang XiuStudies on the Book of Changesquestion-and-answer strategytextual criti-cism and doubtprimacy of human affairsQingli intellectual reforms

《湖南大学学报(社会科学版)》 2026 (3)

24-32,9

国家社会科学基金一般项目:"类宋"视域下幕末日本宋人文集整理与研究(1792-1868)(21BZW101)上海市哲学社会科学规划一般课题:北宋"文人经学"与文学研究(2019BWY012)

10.16339/j.cnki.hdxbskb.2026.03.004

评论