对我国古代踏碓的再认识OA
Re-investigation of the Trip-hammer in Ancient China
针对论文《农具图谱视野下的"踏碓"系统考释》提出若干商榷意见:我国古代不存在侧向单栏杆扶手式踏碓;也不存在利用坐力或者坐着作业的踏碓;存在沿用到现代的用绳索系在碓首助力作业的挽碓;不存在双支点的踏碓;碓轴与支撑座形成转动副的踏碓自汉代起便是主流形式.在科技史研究中,应坚持两条原则:特殊声称需慎重,史料征引应严谨.
Based on the paper An Investigation and Interpretation of Pedal Threshers in Farm Tools Atlas,some views for discussion are put forward.There was no sideways single-bar handrail type trip-hammer in ancient China,and there was no trip-hammer using laborer's weight by sitting on the pestle or sitting to tread.There was one kind of trip-hammer with a rope tied to the head of the pestle to assist in pulling,which is still used in modern times.There was no trip-hammer with double fulcrums,and the type of trip-hammer with a shaft and two supports forming a rotating pair has been the dominant form since the Han Dynasty.In the study of the history of science and technology,two principles should be adhered to:special claims require caution,and the citation of historical materials should be rigorous.
史晓雷
湖南农业大学 通识教育中心,湖南 长沙 410128||湖南省城头山农耕文化研究院,湖南 澧县 415500
社会科学
踏碓农具技术史农具史
Trip-hammerFarm implementHistory of technologyHistory of farm implements
《广西民族大学学报(自然科学版)》 2026 (1)
30-36,7
国家社会科学基金项目(22BMZ079).
评论