首页|期刊导航|北京大学学报(医学版)|全球疫苗集中采购的价格效应

全球疫苗集中采购的价格效应OA

Price effects of global vaccine pooled procurement

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:评估以联合国儿童基金会(United Nations Children's Fund,UNICEF)和泛美卫生组织(Pan Ameri-can Health Organization,PAHO)为代表的国际集中采购机制对疫苗价格的影响.方法:基于2013-2024年188个国家的14 497条疫苗采购交易记录,采用高维固定效应模型与事件研究法识别价格效应及动态趋势,并进行多维异质性分析.结果:(1)基准模型表明,相比单一国家的自主采购,通过UNICEF进行集中采购的疫苗价格平均显著降低27.6%(β=-0.323,P<0.01);PAHO机制同样显示出约30.9%的初步降价潜力(β=-0.370,P=0.052).(2)事件研究法严格验证了平行趋势假设(事前系数联合显著性检验F=0.27,P=0.845),动态追踪显示,在由自主采购转换为集中采购的当年,即可实现约30.0%的价格降幅(β=-0.356,P<0.01),且该降价效应在后续年份中保持持续稳定.(3)异质性检验揭示,集中采购具有显著的"扶弱"效应,即小规模买家获得的降价幅度(38.5%,β=-0.487,P<0.01)显著高于大规模买家(22.5%,β=-0.255,P<0.01);非全球疫苗免疫联盟(Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization,GAVI)援助国家的边际降价系数(β=-0.418,P<0.01)远大于GAVI受援国(β=-0.118,P<0.05);高收入国家组的降幅最大(β=-0.475,P<0.01).(4)供给侧调节效应分析表明,UNICEF的集体议价能力具备跨市场结构的鲁棒性(robustness),未因市场集中度的上升而发生统计学意义上的显著衰减(交互项β=0.095,P>0.10).结论:制度化集中采购能够显著降低疫苗价格;对处于免疫规划融资转型期及面临高自主采购基准价的国家,加入高效的国际集中采购平台是替代外部资金援助、维持疫苗长期可负担性的重要制度安排.

Objective:To evaluate the impact of international pooled procurement mechanisms,which are primarily represented by the United Nations Children's Fund(UNICEF)and the Pan American Health Organization(PAHO),on the procurement prices of vaccines.Methods:Based on 14 497 vac-cine procurement transaction records collected from 188 different countries spanning the period from 2013 to 2024,this research employed a high-dimensional fixed effects model along with an event study metho-dology to accurately identify the price effects and dynamic temporal trends,while simultaneously conduc-ting a multidimensional heterogeneity analysis.Results:(1)The baseline model demonstrated that,when compared to the independent self-procurement conducted by individual nations,utilizing pooled procurement through the UNICEF significantly reduced the average vaccine prices by 27.6%(β=-0.323,P<0.01).The PAHO mechanism similarly exhibited an initial price reduction potential of ap-proximately 30.9%(β=-0.370,P=0.052).(2)The event study method strictly validated the parallel trend assumption(joint significance test of pre-treatment coefficients:F=0.27,P=0.845).Dynamic tracking revealed that a price reduction of approximately 30.0%(β=-0.356,P<0.01)was achieved exactly in the year of transitioning from self-procurement to pooled procurement,and this reduc-tion effect remained persistently stable in subsequent years.(3)Heterogeneity tests revealed a significant"pro-poor"effect of pooled procurement:the price reduction margin obtained by small-scale buyers(38.5%,β=-0.487,P<0.01)was significantly higher than that of large-scale buyers(22.5%,β=-0.255,P<0.01).The marginal price reduction coefficient for non-Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization(GAVI)eligible countries(β=-0.418,P<0.01)was substantially larger than that for GAVI eligible countries(β=-0.118,P<0.05).The high-income country group experienced the most substantial price drop(β=-0.475,P<0.01).(4)The supply-side moderating effect analysis indicated that UNICEF's collective bargaining power maintained robustness across diverse market struc-tures,showing no statistically significant attenuation despite increases in market concentration(interac-tion term β=0.095,P>0.10).Conclusion:Institutionalized pooled procurement mechanisms are ca-pable of significantly reducing vaccine prices.For those countries that are currently in the immunization financing transition period,as well as those facing high self-procurement benchmark prices,participating in an efficient international pooled procurement platform serves as a critical institutional arrangement to replace external financial aid and to effectively maintain the long-term affordability of vaccines.

黄玉鑫;于潇依;许铭

北京大学公共卫生学院全球卫生学系,北京 100191北京大学公共卫生学院全球卫生学系,北京 100191北京大学公共卫生学院全球卫生学系,北京 100191||北京大学全球健康发展研究院,北京 100871

医药卫生

疫苗集中采购成本及成本分析全球健康市场结构

VaccinesPooled procurementCosts and cost analysisGlobal healthMarket structure

《北京大学学报(医学版)》 2026 (3)

437-445,9

10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2026.03.001

评论