首页|期刊导航|中医正骨|补髓丹治疗老年性骨质疏松症肾阳虚证的临床研究

补髓丹治疗老年性骨质疏松症肾阳虚证的临床研究OA

A clinical study of Busui Dan(补髓丹)in treatment of senile osteoporosis with syndrome of kidney-yang defi-ciency

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:观察补髓丹治疗老年性骨质疏松症肾阳虚证的临床疗效和安全性.方法:将190例老年性骨质疏松症肾阳虚证患者随机分为2组,每组95例.常规组患者口服碳酸钙D3片与阿仑膦酸钠片治疗,补髓丹组在此基础上口服补髓丹,疗程均为24周.比较2组患者的中医证候评分、骨密度、综合疗效、膝关节屈伸肌肌力、步态参数、跌倒和骨折情况,以及不良事件发生情况.结果:①一般情况.试验期间,常规组退出9例,其中4例因个人原因未完成治疗、1例未按规定服药、4例失访;补髓丹组退出6例,其中2例因个人原因未完成治疗、1例未按规定服药、3例失访.②中医证候评分.2组中医证候评分随时间变化均呈先降低后小幅升高的趋势(F=2 788.379,P=0.000;F=843.742,P=0.000).除治疗前外,治疗结束后和治疗结束后1年时补髓丹组的中医证候评分均低于常规组(t=-18.992,P=0.000;t=-16.555,P=0.000).③骨密度.治疗前,2组腰椎及股骨颈骨密度的组间差异均无统计学意义.治疗结束后1年时,2组腰椎及股骨颈骨密度均较治疗前升高(腰椎骨密度:e=-16.253,P=0.000;t=-181.220,P=0.000;股骨颈骨密度:t=-10.060,P=0.000;t=-96.045,P=0.000),补髓丹组的腰椎及股骨颈骨密度均高于常规组(t=4.622,P=0.000;t=7.564,P=0.000).④综合疗效.治疗结束后1年时,补髓丹组的综合疗效优于常规组(R补髓丹组=83.95,R常规组=107.05,Z=-3.129,P=0.002).⑤膝关节屈伸肌肌力.2组双侧膝关节屈、伸肌峰力矩随时间变化均呈先增大后小幅减小的趋势(左膝屈肌峰力矩:F=2 546.155,P=0.000;F=463.112,P=0.000;右膝屈肌峰力矩:F=1 745.728,P=0.000;F=401.167,P=0.000;左膝伸肌峰力矩:F=6 784.344,P=0.000;F=1 127.294,P=0.000;右膝伸肌峰力矩:F=33 937.260,P=0.000;F=448.546,P=0.000).治疗前2组双侧膝关节屈、伸肌峰力矩的组间差异均无统计学意义;治疗结束后,补髓丹组的双侧膝关节屈、伸肌峰力矩均大于常规组(左膝屈肌峰力矩:t=7.004,P=0.000;右膝屈肌峰力矩:t=7.545,P=0.000;左膝伸肌峰力矩:t=9.830,P=0.000;右膝伸肌峰力矩:t=5.525,P=0.000);治疗结束后1年时,补髓丹组的双侧膝关节屈、伸肌峰力矩均大于常规组(左膝屈肌峰力矩:t=6.574,P=0.000;右膝屈肌峰力矩:t=9.717,P=0.000;左膝伸肌峰力矩:t=6.978,P=0.000;右膝伸肌峰力矩:t=7.641,P=0.000).⑥步态参数.2组步长和步频随时间变化均呈先增大后小幅减小的趋势(步长:F=22 707.271,P=0.000;F=110.801,P=0.000;步频:F=1 301.949,P=0.000;F=103.065,P=0.000);治疗前 2 组步长和步频的组间差异均无统计学意义;治疗结束后,补髓丹组的步长和步频均大于常规组(步长:t=8.029,P=0.000;步频:t=5.265,P=0.000);治疗结束后1年时,补髓丹组的步长和步频均大于常规组(步长:t=3.651,P=0.000;步频:t=3.813,P=0.000).2组支撑相随时间变化总体均呈减小趋势(F=8 796.480,P=0.000;F=955.811,P=0.000);除治疗前外,治疗结束后和治疗结束后1年时补髓丹组的支撑相均小于常规组(t=-7.581,P=0.000;t=-5.854,P=0.000).⑦跌倒及骨折情况.补髓丹组跌倒和骨折的发生率均低于常规组(x2=6.236,P=0.013;x2=4.336,P=0.037).⑧安全性评价结果.治疗前后2组患者的血常规、尿常规、大便常规、肝肾功能、心电图均未见明显异常改变.补髓丹组7例患者出现胃肠不适、头晕症状,常规组5例患者出现胃肠不适、头晕症状,经对症处理后均缓解.2组不良事件发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(x2=0.356,P=0.551).结论:在钙剂联合阿仑膦酸钠基础上,加用补髓丹治疗老年性骨质疏松症肾阳虚证,不仅能进一步改善肾阳虚症状、提高骨密度,还能增强膝关节屈伸肌力、改善步态,从而降低跌倒及骨折风险,综合疗效优于钙剂联合阿仑膦酸钠治疗,而且具有较高的安全性.

Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of Busui Dan(补髓丹,BSD)in the treatment of senile osteoporosis(SOP)with kidney-yang deficiency syndrome.Methods:One hundred and ninety eligible SOP patients with syndrome of kidney-yang defi-ciency were enrolled in the study and were randomized into conventional group and BSD group,with 95 cases in each group.All patients in the 2 groups were treated with oral application of calcium carbonate and Vitamin D3 tablets,as well as alendronate sodium tablets;more-over,the ones in BSD group were further treated with oral application of BSD.All patients were treated for consecutive 24 weeks.The tradi-tional Chinese medicine(TCM)syndrome score,bone mineral density(BMD),comprehensive therapeutic efficacy,knee flexor and extensor muscle strength,gait parameters,falls and fractures,as well as adverse events,were recorded and compared between the two groups.Results:①General conditions.During the trial,9 patients in the conventional group withdrew from the trial,among which 4 cases for failing to complete treatment due to personal reasons,1 case for failing to take medication as prescribed,and 4 cases for losing to follow-up;while 6 patients in the BSD group withdrew from the trial,among which 2 cases for failing to complete treatment due to personal reasons,1 case for failing to take medication as prescribed,and 3 cases for losing to follow-up.②TCM syndrome score.The TCM syndrome scores showed a trend of initial decrease followed by a slight increase over time in the 2 groups(F=2 788.379,P=0.000;F=843.742,P=0.000).Ex-cept for pretreatment,the TCM syndrome scores were significantly lower in the BSD group compared to the conventional group at post-treat-ment and 1 year post-treatment(t=-18.992,P=0.000;t=-16.555,P=0.000).③BMD.No significant differences were observed be-tween the 2 groups in lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD before the treatment.The BMD at both sites increased in the 2 groups at 1 year post-treatment compared to pretreatment(lumbar spine BMD:t=-16.253,P=0.000;t=-181.220,P=0.000;femoral neck BMD:t=-10.060,P=0.000;t=-96.045,P=0.000),with higher values observed at both sites in BSD group compared to the conventional group(t=4.622,P=0.000;t=7.564,P=0.000).④Comprehensive therapeutic efficacy.At 1 year post-treatment,the BSD group demon-strated superior comprehensive efficacy compared to the conventional group(BSD grouP=83.95,conventional grouP=107.05,Z=-3.129,P=0.002).⑤Knee flexor and extensor muscle strength.The peak torques of bilateral knee flexors and extensors showed a trend of initial increase followed by a slight decrease over time in the 2 groups(left knee flexor peak torque:F=2 546.155,P=0.000;F=463.112,P=0.000;right knee flexor peak torque:F=1 745.728,P=0.000;F=401.167,P=0.000;left knee extensor peak torque:F=6 784.344,P=0.000;F=1 127.294,P=0.000;right knee extensor peak torque:F=33 937.260,P=0.000;F=448.546,P=0.000).No signifi-cant differences were observed between the 2 groups in the peak torques of bilateral knee flexors and extensors before the treatment.At post-treatment,the peak torque values were all greater in BSD group compared to the conventional group(left knee flexor peak torque:t=7.004,P=0.000;right knee flexor peak torque:t=7.545,P=0.000;left knee extensor peak torque:t=9.830,P=0.000;right knee extensor peak torque:t=5.525,P=0.000),and these differences persisted at 1 year post-treatment(left knee flexor peak torque:t=6.574,P=0.000;right knee flexor peak torque:t=9.717,P=0.000;left knee extensor peak torque:t=6.978,P=0.000;right knee extensor peak torque:t=7.641,P=0.000).⑥Gait parameters.The step length and stride frequency showed a trend of initial increase followed by a slight decrease over time in the 2 groups(step length:F=22 707.271,P=0.000;F=110.801,P=0.000;stride frequency:F=1 301.949,P=0.000;F=103.065,P=0.000).No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in the step length and stride frequency before the treatment.At post-treatment,both parameters were significantly greater in BSD group compared to the conven-tional group(step length:t=8.029,P=0.000;stride frequency:t=5.265,P=0.000),and these differences persisted at 1 year post-treat-ment(step length:t=3.651,P=0.000;stride frequency:t=3.813,P=0.000).The support phases decreased over time in the 2 groups(F=8 796.480,P=0.000;F=955.811,P=0.000),with the BSD group showing significantly smaller values at post-treatment and 1 year post-treatment(t=-7.581,P=0.000;t=-5.854,P=0.000).⑦Falls and fractures.The incidence of falls and fractures was sig-nificantly lower in the BSD group compared to the conventional group(x2=6.236,P=0.013;x2=4.336,P=0.037).⑧Safety evaluation.No significant abnormalities in routine blood,urine,stool tests,liver and kidney function,or electrocardiogram were observed before or after the treatment in either group.Seven patients in the BSD group and 5 cases in the conventional group experienced gastrointestinal discomfort or dizziness,all of which were relieved after symptomatic management.There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the 2 groups(x2=0.356,P=0.551).Conclusion:Combination of oral application of BSD with calcium and alendronate sodium in the treatment of SOP with syndrome of kidney-yang deficiency can not only further alleviate kidney-yang deficiency symptoms and improve BMD but also enhance knee flexor and extensor muscle strength and improve gait,thereby reducing the risk of falls and fractures.Its com-prehensive therapeutic efficacy is superior to that of calcium combined with alendronate sodium alone,with a favorable safety profile.

廖翼涛;张贤;李超;肖清明;李文杰;高阳;张海文;刘小峰

无锡市中医医院,江苏 无锡 214071无锡市中医医院,江苏 无锡 214071无锡市中医医院,江苏 无锡 214071无锡市中医医院,江苏 无锡 214071南京中医药大学,江苏 南京 210023南京中医药大学,江苏 南京 210023南京中医药大学,江苏 南京 210023南京中医药大学,江苏 南京 210023

骨质疏松老年人肾阳虚补髓丹骨质疏松性骨折意外跌倒骨密度肌肉强度步态随机对照试验专题

osteoporosisagedsyndrome of deficiency of kidney yangBusui Danosteoporotic fracturesaccidental fallsbone densitymuscle strengthgaitrandomized controlled trials as topic

《中医正骨》 2026 (4)

24-32,9

江苏省基础研究计划自然科学基金项目(BK20231147)南京中医药大学自然科学基金项目(XZR2024076)

评论