首页|期刊导航|中国现代医生|桡动脉掌浅支皮瓣与动脉化静脉皮瓣用于修复手指软组织缺损疗效评估的Meta分析

桡动脉掌浅支皮瓣与动脉化静脉皮瓣用于修复手指软组织缺损疗效评估的Meta分析OA

Meta-analysis of the therapeutic effect of superficial palmar branch of radial artery flap and arterialized venous flap in repairing soft tissue defects of fingers

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 评价桡动脉掌浅支皮瓣(superficial palmar branch of radial artery flap,SPBRAF)与动脉化静脉皮瓣(arterialized venous flap,AVF)用于修复手指软组织缺损的临床疗效.方法 检索中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台、维普网、PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science中2000年1月至2024年6月有关SPBRAF与AVF修复手指缺损疗效比较的文献,以皮瓣存活率、手术时间、手指活动度、手指感觉恢复情况、并发症发生率作为结局指标,采用RevMan5.4软件进行Meta分析.结果 共纳入10项研究,包含539例患者,其中272例使用SPBRAF修复手指缺损,267例使用AVF修复手指缺损.Meta分析结果显示SPBRAF组的皮瓣存活率更高(OR:4.37,95%CI:2.03~9.41,Z=3.77,P=0.0002),手指活动度更好(OR:5.58,95%CI:2.71~11.48,Z=4.66,P<0.000 01),两点分辨觉(MD:-0.96,95%CI:-1.52~-0.39,Z=3.33,P=0.0009)和感觉功能分级(OR:3.79,95%CI:1.88~7.62,Z=3.73,P=0.0002)更佳,并发症发生率更低(OR:0.48,95%CI:0.24~0.95,Z=2.12,P=0.03).AVF组的手术时间更短(MD:14.88,95%CI:7.10~22.66,Z=3.75,P=0.0002).结论 SPBRAF和AVF均可用于手指软组织缺损的修复,但SPBRAF的皮瓣存活率、手指活动度、感觉恢复、并发症发生率等表现得更加优秀,AVF在手术时间上更占优势.

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of superficial palmar branch of radial artery flap(SPBRAF)and arterialized venous flap(AVF)in repairing soft tissue defects of fingers.Methods Relevant literatures comparing the efficacy of SPBRAF and AVF in repairing finger defects from January 2000 to June 2024 were retrieved from CNKI,Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform,VIP,PubMed,Embase,Cochrane Library,and Web of Science.Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan5.4 software,with flap survival rate,operation time,finger range of motion,finger sensory recovery,and complication rate as outcome indicators.Results A total of 10 studies were included,involving 539 cases.Among them,272 cases were repaired with SPBRAF and 267 cases with AVF.The results of the Meta-analysis showed that the flap survival rate was higher in SPBRAF group(OR:4.37,95%CI:2.03-9.41,Z=3.77,P=0.0002),the finger range of motion was better(OR:5.58,95%CI:2.71-11.48,Z=4.66,P<0.000 01),the two point discrimination(MD:-0.96,95%CI:-1.52--0.39,Z=3.33,P=0.0009)and sensory function classification(OR:3.79,95%CI:1.88-7.62,Z=3.73,P=0.0002)were better,and the incidence of complications was lower(OR:0.48,95%CI:0.24-0.95,Z=2.12,P=0.03).The operation time was shorter in AVF group(MD:14.88,95%CI:7.10-22.66,Z=3.75,P=0.0002).Conclusion Both SPBRAF and AVF can be used for the repair of soft tissue defects in fingers.However,SPBRAF performs better in terms of flap survival rate,finger range of motion,sensory recovery,and complication rate,while AVF has an advantage in operation time.

范伟剑;徐吉海;阮健;毛维晟;王欣

宁波市第六医院手显微整复外科,浙江 宁波 315040宁波市第六医院手显微整复外科,浙江 宁波 315040宁波市第六医院手显微整复外科,浙江 宁波 315040宁波市第六医院手显微整复外科,浙江 宁波 315040宁波市第六医院手显微整复外科,浙江 宁波 315040

医药卫生

桡动脉掌浅支皮瓣动脉化静脉皮瓣手指软组织缺损Meta分析

Superficial palmar branch of radial artery flapArterialized venous flapSoft tissue defect of fingerMeta-analysis

《中国现代医生》 2026 (13)

31-36,52,7

10.3969/j.issn.1673-9701.2026.13.007

评论