首页|期刊导航|中国临床药理学杂志|卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂治疗胃癌的临床研究

卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂治疗胃癌的临床研究OA

Clinical trial of capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin in the treatment of gastric cancer

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 观察卡培他滨片联合注射用奥沙利铂注射剂方案(XELOX)治疗胃癌的临床疗效和安全性.方法 将本院行D2根治术治疗Ⅱ期胃癌患者用随机数表法分为对照组与试验组.于术后4周开始,对照组予以替吉奥胶囊,根据体表面积给药40或60 mg,每天2次,连续给药14天,停1周,每21天为1周期,连续治疗8个周期;试验组术后第1天予以130 mg·m-2注射用奥沙利铂,第1~14天给予卡培他滨片,每次1 000 mg·m-2,每天2次,停1周,每21天为1周期,连续治疗8个周期.比较2组的癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原72-4(CA72-4)、糖类抗原 19-9(CA19-9)、微小 RNA-34a(miR-34a)、无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS),并进行安全性评价.结果 共筛选150例,入组130例,其中对照组65例,脱落5例;试验组65例,脱落5例,最终各有60例纳入统计分析.治疗8个周期后,试验组和对照组的CEA水平分别为(4.83±1.22)和(6.33±1.14)ng·mL-1,CA19-9 水平分别为(24.33±3.58)和(28.86±4.18)U.mL-1,CA72-4水平分别为(5.48±1.22)和(7.27±1.55)μg·L-1,miR-34a相对表达水平分别为2.57±0.45和2.13±0.42,试验组的上述指标与对照组比较,在统计学上差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).试验组和对照组的中位DFS分别为56和48个月,2组DFS生存曲线在统计学上差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);中位OS分别为62和60个月,2组的OS生存曲线在统计学上差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).试验组的药物不良反应包括白细胞减少、血小板减少、外周神经毒性等,对照组包括白细胞减少、血小板减少等,试验组和对照组的外周神经毒性发生率分别为6.67%(4例/60例)和0%(0例/60例),手足综合征发生率分别为21.67%(13例/60例)和0%(0例/60例),≥ Ⅲ级白细胞减少发生率分别为16.67%(10例/60例)和5.00%(3例/60例),≥ Ⅲ级血小板减少发生率分别为8.33%(5例/60例)和0%(0例/60例),试验组上述药物不良反应发生率与对照组比较,在统计学上差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).结论 XELOX方案用于Ⅱ期胃癌术后辅助化疗可以有效改善肿瘤标志物水平,延长DFS,且相较于替吉奥胶囊单药方案有明显优势,但药物不良反应也更明显.

Objective To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of capecitabine tablets combined with oxaliplatin for injection(XELOX)in the treatment of gastric cancer.Methods Patients with stage Ⅱ gastric cancer who underwent D2 radical surgery in the hospital were divided into control group and treatment group by the random number table method.Starting at 4 weeks postoperatively,the control group was administered tegifur capsules with dosage adjusted based on body surface area of 40 or 60 mg,taken twice daily for 14 consecutive days,followed by a 1-week break,with each 21-day cycle repeated for 8 consecutive cycles.The treatment group received 130 mg·m-2 of intravenous oxaliplatin on the first postoperative day,followed by capecitabine tablets at 1 000 mg·m-2 per dose,twice daily from days 1 to 14,followed by a 1-week break,with each 21-day cycle repeated for 8 consecutive cycles.The carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA),carbohydrate antigen 72-4(CA72-4),carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA19-9),microRNA-34a(miR-34a),disease-free survival(DFS)and overall survival(OS)were compared between the two groups,and the safety evaluation was performed.Results A total of 150 patients were screened,and 130 cases were enrolled in the trial,including 65 cases in control group(with 5 dropouts)and 65 cases in treatment group(with 5 dropouts).Ultimately,60 patients from each group were included in the statistical analysis.After 8 cycles of treatment,CEA levels in treatment group and control group were(4.83±1.22)and(6.33±1.14)ng·mL-1,CA19-9 levels were(24.33±3.58)and(28.86±4.18)U·mL-1,CA72-4 levels were(5.48±1.22)and(7.27±1.55)μg·L-1,the relative expression levels of miR-34a were 2.57±0.45 and 2.13±0.42,respectively.Compared with control group,the aforementioned indicators in treatment group showed statistically significant differences(all P<0.05).The median DFS values in treatment group and control group were 56 and 48 months,respectively,and the difference in DFS survival curve between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05);the median OS values were 62 and 60 months,respectively,and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).Adverse drug reactions in treatment group included leukopenia,thrombocytopenia and peripheral neurotoxicity,while those in control group included leukopenia and thrombocytopenia.The incidence rates of peripheral neurotoxicity in treatment group and control group were 6.67%(4 cases/60 cases)and 0%(0 cases/60 cases),the incidence rates of hand-foot syndrome were 21.67%(13 cases/60 cases)and 0%(0 cases/60 cases),the incidence rates of grade≥ Ⅲ leukopenia were 16.67%(10 cases/60 cases)and 5.00%(3 cases/60 cases),the incidence rates of grade≥ Ⅲ thrombocytopenia were 8.33%(5 cases/60 cases)and 0%(0 cases/60 cases),respectively.The incidence rates of the aforementioned adverse drug reactions in treatment group were statistically significantly different from those in control group(all P<0.05).Conclusion The application of XELOX regimen as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for stage Ⅱ gastric cancer can effectively improve the levels of tumor markers and prolong the DFS,and has more obvious advantages compared to tegafur capsule gimeracil oteracil potassium single-drug regimen,but the adverse drug reactions are also more obvious.

沈玲;任晓;张要盛;杨秀丽

南阳医学高等专科学校第一附属医院肿瘤内科,河南南阳 473000南阳医学高等专科学校第一附属医院肿瘤内科,河南南阳 473000南阳医学高等专科学校第一附属医院肿瘤内科,河南南阳 473000南阳医学高等专科学校第一附属医院肿瘤内科,河南南阳 473000

医药卫生

卡培他滨片注射用奥沙利铂胃癌肿瘤标志物预后

capecitabine tabletoxaliplatin for injectiongastric cancertumor markerprognosis

《中国临床药理学杂志》 2026 (9)

1258-1263,6

10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2026.09.010

评论