位点特异性Hounsfield单位预测腰椎融合器下沉OA
Site-specific Hounsfield units predict lumbar cage subsidence using predict
目的:探讨并验证终板后部(index-post)位点特异性Hounsfield单位(Hounsfield unit,HU)评估,提升融合器下沉预测,并复合椎体骨质量(vertebral bone quality,VBQ)分数.方法:回顾性匹配病例对照研究,90例单节段经后路腰椎椎间融合术(transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,TLIF)患者分为下沉组30 例和非下沉组60 例,匹配年龄、性别和节段.术前CT测量位点特异性HU(index-post,index-mid,index-ant)和传统位点(L1 中央,L1-L4 平均).从术前MRI计算VBQ、受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)分析、Logistic回归和决策曲线评估预测性能.结果:下沉发生率33.3%(30/90).下沉组Index-Post HU为(96.5±25.8)HU低于非下沉组(123.4±29.1)HU,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001,Cohen's d=0.98).ROC 结果显示,Index-Post HU 曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)=0.78,95%CI(0.69,0.87),优于传统位点L1椎体中央AUC=0.65,DeLong P=0.012.最佳阈值112 HU(敏感度70.0%,特异性68.3%).复合模型AUC 0.83.多变量Logistic 回归确认Index-Post HU(OR=0.965,P=0.006)和年龄(OR=1.045,P=0.015)为独立预测因子.决策曲线显示20%~50%阈值范围净效益.结论:终板后部位点特异性HU测量优于传统方法预测TLIF融合器下沉,VBQ复合进一步提升.但验证该结论的标准化及临床价值仍需多中心验证.
Objective To investigate and validate the utility of site-specific Hounsfield unit(HU)measurements at the posterior endplate(Index-Post)for predicting cage subsidence after lumbar fusion,and to evaluate its performance when com-bined with the Vertebral Bone Quality(VBQ)score.Methods A retrospective matched case-control study was conducted.Ninety patients who underwent single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF)were allocated into a subsidence group(n=30)and a non-subsidence group(n=60),matched for age,sex,and surgical level.Preoperative CT was used to mea-sure site-specific HU values(Index-Post,Index-Mid,Index-Ant)and traditional sites(L1 center,L1-L4 average).VBQ scores were calculated from preoperative MRI.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)analysis,logistic regression,and decision curve analysis(DCA)were performed to assess predictive performance.Results The incidence of cage subsidence was 33.3%(30/90).The Index-Post HU in the subsidence group(96.5±25.8)HU was significantly lower than that in the non-subsidence group(123.4±29.1)HU(P<0.001,Cohen's d=0.98).ROC analysis showed that the Index-Post HU had an area under the curve(AUC)of 0.78[95%CI(0.69,0.87)],which was superior to the traditional L1 vertebral center HU(AUC=0.65;DeLong test,P=0.012).The optimal cutoff value was 112 HU,yielding a sensitivity of 70.0%and specificity of 68.3%.The composite model(HU+VBQ)achieved an AUC of 0.83.Multivariate logistic regression identified Index-Post HU(OR=0.965,P=0.006)and age(OR=1.045,P=0.015)as independent predictors.Decision curve analysis demonstrated a net benefit within the threshold probability range of 20%to 50%.Conclusion Site-specific HU measurement at the posterior endplate is superior to traditional methods for predicting cage subsidence following TLIF.Combining this metric with the VBQ score further enhances predictive efficacy.However,standardized measurement protocols and multicenter validation are still required to confirm these findings and establish their clinical utility.
徐升;徐雍剑;车黎睿
常山县人民医院,浙江 常山 324200常山县人民医院,浙江 常山 324200常山县人民医院,浙江 常山 324200
医药卫生
腰椎脊柱融合术融合器下沉Hounsfield单位椎体骨质量风险预测
Lumbar vertebraeSpinal fusionCage subsidenceHounsfield unitsVertebral bone qualityRisk prediction
《中国骨伤》 2026 (5)
493-502,10
评论