人工智能辅助舌诊的可视化分析与临床可解释性评价OA
Visualization analysis and clinical interpretability evaluation of artificial intelligence-assisted tongue diagnosis
目的 通过文献计量学分析勾勒人工智能(AI)辅助舌诊的研究全景,并通过诊断准确性试验的meta 分析定量评价其诊断准确性与临床可解释性.方法 文献计量学分析通过检索 Web of Science核心合集(WoSCC)中 2014年 1 月 1日至 2025 年 12月 31 日发表的 AI辅助舌诊相关英文论文与综述,采用 Bib-liometrix、VOSviewer 与 CiteSpace,从年度发文量与学科分布、期刊与引文特征、国家/地区与机构合作、作者网络、关键词共现以及关键词突现检测等多个维度进行综合分析.诊断准确性试验 meta分析按照诊断准确性试验的系统评价/meta分析报告规范(PRISMA-DTA),系统检索 Scopus、PubMed、Web of Sci-ence 与中国知网(CNKI)四个数据库.采用双变量随机效应模型的层次汇总受试者工作特征曲线(HSROC)合并敏感度与特异度,并按疾病类别、AI模型架构及样本量分层进行亚组分析.方法学质量采用诊断试验准确性研究质量评价工具第 2版(QUADAS-2)进行评估,发表偏倚通过 Deeks漏斗图不对称性检验评估.结果 文献计量学分析共纳入 198 篇文献.2014-2025 年该领域年度发文量增长 24.5 倍(由2014 年 2 篇增至 2025 年 49 篇),2022-2025 年发文量占全部文献的 65.2%.中国贡献了约 83.5%的机构归属,其中上海中医药大学发文最多,许家佗为发文最多的作者.关键词分析识别出 AI与深度学习架构、图像处理与分割、中医特异性应用、疾病特异性应用四个主题集群,并呈现出从传统机器学习向深度学习、transformer 架构、可解释性 AI及多模态融合架构演进的时序特征.诊断准确性 meta分析共纳入 16项研究(14 755 名受试者),覆盖代谢与肝脏疾病、肿瘤与口腔病变、心血管风险、糖尿病等多个领域.合并敏感度为 90.3%[95%置信区间(CI):86.7%-93.1%],合并特异度为 93.0%(95%CI:90.6%-94.7%),汇总受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.961;异质性显著(敏感度 I2=95.8%;特异度 I2=92.1%).亚组分析显示,不同疾病类别、AI架构与样本量分层之间性能总体一致,Deeks检验未提示显著的发表偏倚(P=0.258).结论 AI辅助舌诊已快速发展,其合并诊断性能与既有筛查方式相当,提示其有望作为一种互补、便捷可及的辅助决策工具应用于临床.
Objective To map the research landscape of artificial intelligence(AI)-assisted tongue diag-nosis through bibliometric analysis and to quantify its diagnostic accuracy and clinical inter-pretability through a diagnostic test accuracy(DTA)meta-analysis. Methods For the bibliometric analysis,the Web of Science Core Collection(WoSCC)was queried for English-language articles and reviews on AI-assisted tongue diagnosis published between January 1,2014 and December 31,2025,and analysed using Bibliometrix,VOSview-er,and CiteSpace,with major output dimensions including annual publication output and disciplinary distribution,journal and citation characteristics,country/region and institution-al collaboration,author networks,keyword co-occurrence,and keyword burst detection.For the DTA meta-analysis,four databases[Scopus,PubMed,Web of Science,and China Nation-al Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)]were searched in accordance with the Preferred Report-ing Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy(PRISMA-DTA)guidelines.A bivariate random-effects model hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic(HSROC)was used to pool sensitivity and specificity,with subgroup analyses by disease category,AI model architecture,and sample-size strata.Methodological quality was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies version 2(QUADAS-2)tool,and publication bias was evaluated by Deeks'funnel plot asymmetry test. Results A total of 198 publications met the bibliometric eligibility criteria.Annual output in-creased 24.5-fold(from 2 in 2014 to 49 in 2025),with the period 2022-2025 alone accounting for 65.2%of all publications.China contributed approximately 83.5%of all institutional affilia-tions,with Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Jiatuo Xu being the most productive institution and author,respectively.Keyword analysis identified four thematic clusters(AI and deep-learning architectures,image processing and segmentation,traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)-specific applications,and disease-specific applications)and a tem-poral evolution from traditional machine learning to deep learning and transformer-based,explainable,and multimodal AI architectures.Sixteen DTA meta-analysis studies(14 755 participants)covering metabolic and hepatic disorders,oncological and oral lesions,cardiovascular risk,diabetes,and other clinical applications were included in the DTA meta-analysis.The pooled sensitivity was 90.3%[95%confidence interval(CI):86.7%-93.1%]and the pooled specificity was 93.0%(95%CI:90.6%-94.7%);the area under the summary receiv-er operating characteristic(SROC)curve(AUC)was 0.961.Heterogeneity was substantial(I2=95.8%for sensitivity;I2=92.1%for specificity).Subgroup performance was broadly consistent across disease categories,AI architectures,and sample-size strata,and Deeks'test indicated no significant publication bias(P=0.258). Conclusion AI-assisted tongue diagnosis has progressed rapidly and shows pooled diagnos-tic performance comparable to established screening modalities,supporting its potential as a complementary and easily accessible decision-support tool.
刘梨会;胡凯文;周亚娜
湖北中医药大学中医学院,湖北 武汉 430061,中国||湖北省中医院肿瘤科,湖北 武汉 430074,中国||湖北中医药大学附属医院中医肝肾研究及应用湖北省重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430074,中国湖北中医药大学中医学院,湖北 武汉 430061,中国||湖北省中医院肿瘤科,湖北 武汉 430074,中国||湖北中医药大学附属医院中医肝肾研究及应用湖北省重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430074,中国||北京中医药大学东方医院肿瘤科,北京 100078,中国湖北省中医院肿瘤科,湖北 武汉 430074,中国||湖北中医药大学附属医院中医肝肾研究及应用湖北省重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430074,中国||湖北省中医药研究院,湖北 武汉 430061,中国||湖北时珍实验室,湖北 武汉 430060,中国
舌诊人工智能中医诊断准确性文献计量学meta 分析
Tongue diagnosisArtificial intelligenceTraditional Chinese medicineDiagnostic accuracyBibliometric analysisMeta-analysis
《数字中医药(英文)》 2026 (2)
223-240,18
Hubei Provincial Science and Technology Plan Project(2025CCB018).
评论