首页|期刊导航|生物骨科材料与临床研究|关节镜下双排固定技术治疗中度骨性Bankart损伤的临床研究

关节镜下双排固定技术治疗中度骨性Bankart损伤的临床研究OA

Clinical study on arthroscopic double-row fixation technique for moderate bony Bankart injuries

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 分析关节镜下采用双排固定技术治疗骨性Bankart损伤的临床疗效分析.方法 回顾性分析沧州市中心医院自2017年1月至2021年12月行关节镜下修复术的68例骨性Bankart损伤患者临床资料.根据术中缝合固定方式分为双排缝合组(35例)和单排缝合固定组(33例).记录两组术中植入锚钉数量、手术时间;采用美国肩关节外科医生评分(American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score,ASES)和Constant-Murley评分评价术前、术后1年及末次随访肩关节功能活动水平,同时所有病例采用肩关节CT及肩关节核磁,评估Bankart骨折的复位及肌腱愈合情况.结果 所有患者均获得随访,随访时间中位数为39.5(36,46)个月.双排缝合组术中缝合锚钉数量多于单排缝合组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);但两组手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组间患者术前及术后1年的ASES评分、Constant评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);末次随访双排缝合组的ASES评分、Constant评分优于单排缝合组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).根据术后CT评估双排缝合组复位优良率(71.4%)高于单排缝合组(42.4%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).双排缝合组复发不稳4例,复发率为11.4%;单排缝合组复发不稳7例,复发率21.2%.两组复发率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).Logistic回归分析结果显示:小于45岁、复位优良率差是关节镜骨性Bankart修复术后复发不稳的独立危险因素,其OR(95%CI)分别为0.115(0.022-0.606)、0.137(0.025-0.764).结论 单、双排锚钉缝合固定技术治疗中度(Kim Ⅱ型)骨性Bankart损伤均可获得满意的临床疗效,但是双排锚钉固定技术复位优良率更高,中期恢复效果也更好;年龄和复位优良率是影响术后稳定的独立危险因素.

Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the arthroscopic double-row suture fixation technique in managing Type II bony Bankart injuries.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 68 patients diagnosed with bony Bankart lesions who underwent arthroscopic repair between January 2017 and December 2021 at Cangzhou Central Hospital.Based on the intraoperative suture fixation method,patients were divided into a double-row suture group(n=35)and a single-row suture fixation group(n=33).The number of anchor screws implanted during surgery and the duration of the procedure were recorded for both groups.Shoulder joint function was evaluated preoperatively,at 1 year postoperatively,and at the final follow-up using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score(ASES)and the Constant-Murley Score.Furthermore,all patients underwent tomography(CT)and magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)to assess the reduction of Bankart fractures and tendon integrity.Results All patients were followed up with a median follow-up time of 39.5(36,46)months.The number of suture anchors used was significantly higher in the double-row group than in the single-row group(P<0.05),while no significant difference was found in operative time(P>0.05).There were no significant differences in ASES and Constant scores between the two groups preoperatively or at 1 year postoperatively(P>0.05).However,at the final follow-up,the double-row group showed significantly better ASES and Constant scores compared to the single-row group(P<0.05).According to postoperative CT assessment,the excellent-good reduction rate was significantly higher in the double-row group(71.4%)than in the single-row group(42.4%)(P<0.05).Recurrent instability occurred in 4 cases in the double-row group(recurrence rate 11.4%)and in 7 cases in the single-row group(recurrence rate 21.2%),with no statistically significant difference between the groups(P>0.05).Logistic regression analysis indicated that age under 45 years and poor reduction quality were independent risk factors for postoperative instability,with odds ratios(95%CI)of 0.115(0.022-0.606)and 0.137(0.025-0.764),respectively.Conclusion Both single-row and double-row anchor suture fixation techniques yield satisfactory clinical outcomes for the treatment of moderate(Kim type Ⅱ)bony Bankart lesions.However,the double-row fixation technique achieves a higher rate of anatomical reduction and provides better mid-term functional recovery.Age and reduction quality are independent risk factors for postoperative instability.

李龙杰;王春雷;刘朝晖;刘畅;陈思;张海森;路建;李海滨

沧州市中心医院运动医学科,河北 沧州,061001沧州市中心医院运动医学科,河北 沧州,061001沧州市中心医院运动医学科,河北 沧州,061001沧州市中心医院运动医学科,河北 沧州,061001沧州市中心医院运动医学科,河北 沧州,061001沧州市中心医院运动医学科,河北 沧州,061001沧州市人民医院骨科,河北 沧州,061001沧州市第五医院(青县人民医院)骨科,河北 沧州,062650

医药卫生

关节镜Bankart损伤双排固定肩关节不稳危险因素

ArthroscopyBankart injuryDouble-row fixationShoulder instabilityRisk factors

《生物骨科材料与临床研究》 2026 (3)

45-50,6

河北省适宜卫生技术推广项目(P20210024)

10.3969/j.issn.1672-5972.2026.03.008

评论