《闲情偶寄》与《园冶》园林思想和美学意义的比较研究OACHSSCD
Comparative Study of the Garden Design Philosophy and Aesthetic Significance between XianqingOuji and YuanYe
明末清初,园林由注重营造技术与居住空间,逐渐转化为文人审美实践与生活经营的重要场域.通过文本细读与比较分析,考察《闲情偶寄》与《园冶》在园林思想与美学意义上的差异及关联.研究认为,《闲情偶寄》强调园居生活中的日常趣味与主体体验,《园冶》则重在空间的整体经营与艺术造境.二者虽路径不同,却共同反对程式化、匠气化的造园倾向,体现出同一时代语境中园林审美分化的思想趋向.两书的比较不仅有助于把握这一时期园林思想的内在转型,也为理解园林美学意义提供了可辨析的文本范式.
During the late Ming and early Qing periods,gardens gradually evolved from techniques of construction and spaces of residence into important sites for literati aesthetic practice and the cultivation of everyday life.Through close reading and comparative analysis,this article examines the differences and interconnections between XianqingOuji and YuanYe in terms of the garden design philosophy and aesthetic significance.Researchs suggest that XianqingOuji emphasizes the pleasures of everyday garden living and subjective experience,whereas YuanYe is more concerned with the overall spatial organization of the garden and the artistic creation of scenic ambience.Despite their different approaches,both works oppose formulaic and overly contrived tendencies in garden making,reflecting the same historical context,an intellectual tendency toward the differentiation of garden aesthetics.The comparison of the two books not only helps illuminate the internal transformation of garden design philosophy in this period,but also provides a useful textual paradigm for understanding the aesthetic significance of gardens.
李梦墨
中国传媒大学 艺术研究院,北京 100024||天津职业大学 艺术工程学院,天津 300410
社会科学
《闲情偶寄》园居《园冶》造境造趣
XianqingOujigarden dwellingYuanYethe creation of artistic conception and aesthetic charm
《南阳师范学院学报》 2026 (4)
69-76,8
天津市艺术科学规划项目"影视作品中的'天津人'研究"(C24011).
评论