首页|期刊导航|南京工业大学学报(社会科学版)|数字乡村建设的多元模式与国际镜鉴

数字乡村建设的多元模式与国际镜鉴OACHSSCD

Multiple Models and International Insights in Digital Village Construction:A Comparative Case Study of China and Abroad Based on the Conditional"Variable-DOPP"Framework

中文摘要英文摘要

锚定"十五五"规划与 2026 年中央一号文件关于"实施数字乡村高质量发展行动"的战略部署,我国数字乡村建设已正式迈入由基础网络全面铺开转向数字应用深度融合的关键窗口期.在数字技术赋能乡村振兴战略共识下,各地数字乡村建设为何呈现路径迥异的多元模式,是亟待解答的现实议题.基于此,首先,构建"条件变量-DOPP 框架",旨在通过产业基础、政府数字化能力与社会资本活跃度三大条件变量,探析数字乡村建设模式差异化的条件机制,并借助涵盖驱动主体、建设目标、推进路径与实践局限的 DOPP 框架,提炼不同模式的典型特征.研究发现,国内已形成了治理先行的浙江"整体智治"模式、技术密集的寿光"产业赋能"模式与市场内生的淘宝村"平台驱动"模式.其次,以机制解释与模式比较为研究主线,系统剖析国内外典型案例.总结欧盟社区内生的中间组织机制、韩国政府引导的人本能力建设与日本技术重构的产学研政协同逻辑,进而为我国破解小农户数字门槛、防范技术红利固化、深化组织生态等提供重要启示.最后,立足"十五五"时期数字乡村高质量发展目标,从差异化推进机制、农业数据要素市场化、农民数字素养提升、中间组织培育及数字包容性评估五个方面提出了对策建议.

Anchored in the strategic deployment of the"15th Five-Year Plan"and the 2026"No.1 Central Document"regarding the"implementation of high-quality development actions for digital villages,"China's digital village construction has officially entered a critical transitional window,shifting from the comprehensive rollout of basic networks to the deep integration of digital applications.Under the strategic consensus of utilizing digital technology to empower rural revitalization,understanding why digital village construction across different regions exhibits diverse patterns with distinctly varied pathways has become a pressing practical issue.Accordingly,first,constructs a Conditional Variable-DOPP Framework.By analyzing three primary conditional variables—industrial base,government digital capacity,and social capital activism—this study aims to explore the underlying mechanisms driving the differentiation of digital village models.Furthermore,it extracts the typical characteristics of various models using the DOPP framework,which encompasses driving forces,objectives,promotion pathways,and practical limitations.The research reveals that China has formed three distinct models:Zhejiang's governance-first"holistic smart governance"model,Shouguang's technology-intensive"industrial empowerment"model,and the Taobao Village's market-endogenous"platform-driven"model.Secondly,adopting mechanism explanation and model comparison as the central analytical thread,this paper systematically dissects typical cases from both China and abroad.It summarizes the intermediate organizational mechanisms of the EU's community-endogenous model,the human-centric capacity building of South Korea's government-guided model,and the industry-academia-research-government collaborative logic of Japan's technology restructuring model.These provide crucial insights for China to overcome the digital threshold for smallholder farmers,prevent the structural stratification of technological dividends,and deepen the restructuring of its organizational ecology.Finally,grounded in the goal of high-quality digital village development during the"15th Five-Year Plan"period,this paper proposes policy recommendations across five dimensions:differentiated advancement mechanisms,the marketization of agricultural data elements,the enhancement of farmers' digital literacy,the cultivation of intermediate organizations,and the evaluation of digital inclusivity.

张琦;董菡;王国义

北京师范大学 经济与工商管理学院,北京 100875中国船舶集团有限公司党校,北京 100081中国船舶集团有限公司党校,北京 100081

管理科学

数字乡村建设乡村全面振兴"条件变量-DOPP框架"数字产业乡村高质量发展

《南京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2026 (2)

111-125,15

马克思主义理论研究和建设工程重大项目"习近平总书记关于减贫重要论述研究"(2025MZD007)

评论