首页|期刊导航|棉花学报|咸水补灌对滴灌棉花光合特性及产量的影响

咸水补灌对滴灌棉花光合特性及产量的影响OA

The influence of saline water supplemental irrigation on the photosynthetic characteristics and yield of drip-irrigated cotton

中文摘要英文摘要

[目的]淡水匮乏严重制约新疆干旱半干旱区棉花生产,关键生育时期缺水对产量影响更甚.咸水补灌可缓解水资源短缺压力,但其适宜矿化度阈值尚不明确.本研究探讨了不同矿化度咸水补灌对棉花光合特性及产量形成的影响,以明确适合干旱区棉花补灌的咸水矿化度阈值.[方法]于2023-2024年连续2个棉花生长季开展田间试验,以当地大田常规淡水未补灌为对照(CK,灌溉定额3 600m3·hm-2),另设置5个矿化度咸水补灌处理:3.5 g·L-1(S3.5)、5.0g·L-1(S5)、6.5 g·L-1(S6.5)、8.0 g·L-1(S8)、9.5 g·L-1(S9.5).咸水补灌采用"蕾期 1 次(375m3·hm-2)+花铃期 2 次(375 m3·hm-z+450 m3·hm-2)"的模式,总灌水量 4 800 m3·hm-2,包括咸水1 200m3·hm-2,淡水3 600m3·hm-2).补灌后,测定棉花功能叶片气体交换参数、叶绿素荧光参数;调查统计产量构成及产量.[结果]2年结果平均:在棉花盛铃前期,S3.5、S5和S6.5处理的净光合速率较CK提高6.89%~18.00%,2年试验中S3.5处理的净光合速率均显著高于CK处理;S3.5、S5处理的蒸腾速率较CK分别显著提高18.96%与9.10%,气孔导度较CK分别提升12.95%、3.90%.3次咸水补灌完成后,S9.5处理的初始荧光较CK显著增加5.99%(2023年)与6.54%(2024年),S3.5处理的最大光化学效率均显著高于S9.5处理.S3.5处理的棉花铃叶比最低,2年分别为24.58和24.87;S5处理次之,2年分别为25.02和25.05.矿化度3.5~6.5g·L-1处理的2年平均籽棉产量较CK(5 721.00 kg·hm-2)显著提高2.73%~12.67%.[结论]矿化度3.5~6.5 g·L-1的咸水补灌可优化棉花光合性能、实现增产;而矿化度过高(>6.5g·L-1)易引发光抑制导致棉花显著减产,该研究为干旱区农业咸水灌溉阈值的确定提供了重要理论依据.

[Objective]The severe shortage of freshwater has severely restricted cotton production in the arid and semi-arid areas of Xinjiang,and water deficit during the key growth stages exerts an even more adverse effect on yield.Saline water supplemental irrigation can alleviate freshwater shortages,but its optimal salinity threshold remains unclear.This study investigated the effects of supplemental irrigation with saline water of different salinity levels on the photosynthetic characteristics and yield formation of cotton,aiming to determine the suitable salinity threshold for cotton supplemental irrigation in arid areas.[Methods]A two-year field experiment was conducted during the cotton growing seasons in 2023 and 2024.The conventional fresh water without supplemental irrigation was used as the control(CK,irrigation quota of 3 600 m3·hm-2),and five saline water supplemental irrigation treatments were established:3.5 g·L-1(S3.5),5.0 g·L-1(S5),6.5 g·L-1(S6.5),8.0 g·L-1(S8),9.5 g·L-1(S9.5).The saline supplemental irrigation regime consisted of one application at the bud stage(375 m3·hm-2)and two applications at the boll-setting stage(375 m3·hm-2+450 m3·hm-2).The total irrigation amount was 4 800 m3·hm-2(including 1 200 m3·hm-2 of saline water and 3 600 m3·hm-2 of freshwater).Gas exchange parameters,chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in functional leaves after saline water irrigations,and yield components of cotton were measured.[Results]During the early boll-setting stage,the two-year average net photosynthetic rate(Pn)of treatments with salinity levels of S3.5,S5,and S6.5 increased by 6.89%-18.00%compared with CK,and the S3.5 treatment was significantly higher than CK.The transpiration rates(Tr)of the S3.5 and S5 treatments were significantly increased by 18.96%and 9.10%,respectively,compared with CK,and the stomatal conductances(Gs)were increased by 12.95%and 3.90%,respectively.After three saline water supplementary irrigations,the initial fluorescence(F0)of the S9.5 treatment was significantly increased by 5.99%(in 2023)and 6.54%(in 2024)relative to CK,while the maximum photochemical efficiency(Fv/Fm)of the S3.5 treatment was significantly higher than that of the S9.5 treatment.The boll-leaf ratio of cotton was the lowest in the S3.5 treatment,with two-year values of 24.58 and 24.87,followed by the S5 treatment with values of 25.02 and 25.05.The two-year average seed cotton yield of treatments with salinity levels of 3.5-6.5 g·L-1 significantly increased by 2.73%-12.67%compared with CK(5 721.00 kg·hm-2).[Conclusion]Supplemental irrigation with saline water with a salinity level of 3.5-6.5 g·L-1 can optimize the photosynthetic performance of cotton and achieve stable or increased yields.However,excessively high salinity level(>6.5 g·L-1)is prone to cause photo inhibition,leading to a significant reduction in cotton yield.This study provides an important theoretical basis for determining the salinity threshold for saline water irrigation in arid areas.

杨雅辰;依尔夏提·阿不来提;梁福斌;吕晴晴;张娜;徐文修;崔建平;王波;田立文;王亮;郭仁松;林涛

新疆维吾尔自治区农业科学院棉花研究所(国家棉花工程技术研究中心)/新疆棉花遗传改良与智慧生产重点实验室/新疆棉花技术创新中心,乌鲁木齐 830091||新疆农业大学农学院(棉花教育部工程研究中心),乌鲁木齐 830052新疆维吾尔自治区农业科学院棉花研究所(国家棉花工程技术研究中心)/新疆棉花遗传改良与智慧生产重点实验室/新疆棉花技术创新中心,乌鲁木齐 830091新疆维吾尔自治区农业科学院棉花研究所(国家棉花工程技术研究中心)/新疆棉花遗传改良与智慧生产重点实验室/新疆棉花技术创新中心,乌鲁木齐 830091新疆维吾尔自治区农业科学院棉花研究所(国家棉花工程技术研究中心)/新疆棉花遗传改良与智慧生产重点实验室/新疆棉花技术创新中心,乌鲁木齐 830091新疆维吾尔自治区农业科学院棉花研究所(国家棉花工程技术研究中心)/新疆棉花遗传改良与智慧生产重点实验室/新疆棉花技术创新中心,乌鲁木齐 830091||农业农村部荒漠绿洲作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830091新疆农业大学农学院(棉花教育部工程研究中心),乌鲁木齐 830052新疆维吾尔自治区农业科学院棉花研究所(国家棉花工程技术研究中心)/新疆棉花遗传改良与智慧生产重点实验室/新疆棉花技术创新中心,乌鲁木齐 830091||农业农村部荒漠绿洲作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830091新疆农业大学资源与环境学院,乌鲁木齐 830052新疆维吾尔自治区农业科学院棉花研究所(国家棉花工程技术研究中心)/新疆棉花遗传改良与智慧生产重点实验室/新疆棉花技术创新中心,乌鲁木齐 830091||农业农村部荒漠绿洲作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830091新疆维吾尔自治区农业科学院棉花研究所(国家棉花工程技术研究中心)/新疆棉花遗传改良与智慧生产重点实验室/新疆棉花技术创新中心,乌鲁木齐 830091||农业农村部荒漠绿洲作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830091新疆维吾尔自治区农业科学院棉花研究所(国家棉花工程技术研究中心)/新疆棉花遗传改良与智慧生产重点实验室/新疆棉花技术创新中心,乌鲁木齐 830091||农业农村部荒漠绿洲作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830091新疆维吾尔自治区农业科学院棉花研究所(国家棉花工程技术研究中心)/新疆棉花遗传改良与智慧生产重点实验室/新疆棉花技术创新中心,乌鲁木齐 830091||农业农村部荒漠绿洲作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830091

棉花咸水补灌气体交换参数叶绿素荧光参数产量构成因素

cottonsaline water supplemental irrigationgas exchangechlorophyll fluorescence parametersyield composition

《棉花学报》 2026 (1)

64-78,15

新疆维吾尔自治区"天池英才"引进计划(青年博士)新疆维吾尔自治区公益性科研院所基本科研业务经费资助项目(KY2024016)新疆维吾尔自治区农业科学院青年科技骨干创新能力培养(xjnkq-2023005)新疆维吾尔自治区棉花产业技术体系长绒棉岗位试验站(XJARS-03-28)

10.11963/yyccs20250052

评论