铁路边坡土钉支护的不同设计理念对比分析OA
Comparative Analysis of Different Design Philosophies for Soil Nailing Support in Railway Slopes
以海外铁路边坡土钉支护设计为背景,对比欧洲极限状态设计体系与中国混合设计体系(安全系数法结合极限状态法)的差异.通过规范梳理与算例分析,从设计架构、验算逻辑、力学模型及安全控制等方面,系统阐明两种体系对土钉受力、结构参数及材料配置的影响.结果表明:两种设计体系的系统性差异导致结构受力、材料配置水平不同,并对设计经济性产生影响.研究成果有助于深化对中国与欧洲岩土工程设计理念差异的理解.
Under the context of overseas railway slope soil nailing design,this study conducted a comparative analysis between the European limit state design system and the Chinese hybrid design system(combining safety factor with limit state design).Through systematic code review and case-based numerical analysis,this study systematically elucidated the impacts of these two systems on soil nail forces,structural parameters,and material configurations across four key dimensions:design architecture,verification logic,mechanical modeling,and safety control.The result shows that,the systemic differences between the two design frameworks lead to distinct patterns of structural response and material utilization,thereby influencing design economics.This research finding contributes to a deeper understanding of the conceptual divergences between Chinese and European geotechnical design philosophies.
朱雯蕾;张雪东;沈宇鹏;张政;李岩峰
中交铁道设计研究总院有限公司,北京 100088中交铁道设计研究总院有限公司,北京 100088北京交通大学,北京 100044中交铁道设计研究总院有限公司,北京 100088中交铁道设计研究总院有限公司,北京 100088
交通工程
铁路边坡土钉支护规范对比极限状态设计分项系数差异耐久性
railway slopesoil nailing supportcode comparisonlimit state designpartial safety factordifferencedurability
《路基工程》 2026 (3)
24-31,8
评论