钢筋桁架双向混凝土板耐火性能及高温承载力分析OA
Fire resistance and high-temperature load-bearing capacity analysis of two-way steel-bars truss concrete slabs
为研究钢筋桁架混凝土板(STC板)的耐火性能,对四边简支的足尺双向钢筋桁架混凝土板与钢筋混凝土板(RC板)开展了耐火试验,对比了两者的开裂模式、温度场和位移发展等的差异,并对其高温承载力进行了计算.研究结果表明:受火初期,STC板因底部镀锌钢板的隔火作用,其内部混凝土和钢筋升温较RC板的慢,温度梯度和竖向位移增速也较RC板的小;当受火时间超过60 min时,由于镀锌钢板逐渐烧焦并剥落,且腹杆钢筋的存在促使内部传热更快,STC板的内部温度以及板中部的竖向位移开始接近甚至超过RC板的;受火时间达到180 min时,STC板和RC板仍未达到耐火极限,这得益于钢筋在板内形成拉伸薄膜效应,提升了高温承载力.经计算,考虑拉伸薄膜效应的双向板高温承载力计算值比采用经典屈服线理论计算的高温承载力平均增大13%~45%,且STC板和RC板的高温承载力差异不大.
To investigate the fire resistance of steel-bars truss concrete slabs(STC slabs),fire resistance tests were conducted on a full-scale four-edge simply supported two-way STC slab and a traditional reinforced concrete(RC)slab,to compare their differences in cracking patterns,temperature field,and displacement development.The load-carrying capacities of both slabs at elevated temperatures were computed.Experimental and calculation results show that during the initial fire stage,the internal concrete and reinforcement of the STC slab heat up more slowly and exhibit a smaller temperature gradient than the RC slab,owing to the fire insulation effect of the bottom galvanized steel sheet.Consequently,the vertical displacement growth rate of the STC slab is lower than that of the RC slab.However,after 60 minutes of fire exposure,as the galvanized steel sheet gradually chars and peels off,and the presence of web bars accelerates internal heat transfer,the internal temperature and vertical displacement at the central region of the STC slab approach or even exceed those of the RC slab.By 180 minutes of fire exposure,neither slab reaches its fire resistance limit,resulting from the formation of tensile membrane effects by the reinforcement within the slabs,which enhances their load-carrying capacities at elevated temperatures.Calculation results reveal that the predicted load-carrying capacity at elevated temperatures considering tensile membrane effects is on average 13%-45%higher than that calculated by the classical yield line theory.Furthermore,the load-carrying capacities at elevated temperatures of the STC and RC slabs exhibit no significant difference.
闫佳;梁伟淳;高望清;张海燕
东莞理工学院 广东省城市生命线工程智慧防灾与应急技术重点实验室,广东 东莞 523808中国建筑国际投资有限公司(广东),广东 广州 510308广东省建筑科学研究院集团股份有限公司,广东 广州 510500华南理工大学 亚热带建筑与城市科学国家重点实验室,广东 广州 510641
建筑与水利
钢筋桁架混凝土板双向板耐火试验拉伸薄膜效应高温承载力
steel-bars truss concrete slabtwo-way slabfire resistance testtensile membrane effecthigh-temperature load-bearing capacity
《建筑结构学报》 2026 (6)
74-86,13
国家自然科学基金项目(52408160),亚热带建筑与城市科学全国重点实验室自主课题(2025ZB11).
评论