首页|期刊导航|结核与肺部疾病杂志|正性同化护理联合多学科-快速康复链式管理在肺癌胸腔镜手术患者中的应用

正性同化护理联合多学科-快速康复链式管理在肺癌胸腔镜手术患者中的应用OA

The application of positive assimilation nursing combined with MDT-ERAS chain nursing in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:分析正性同化护理联合多学科-快速康复(MDT-ERAS)链式护理在肺癌胸腔镜手术患者中的应用效果.方法:选择2024年1-12月于莆田学院附属医院行单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术治疗的肺癌患者80例为研究对象,以抛硬币法实施分组管理,对照组(40例)接受MDT-ERAS链式护理,观察组(40例)于对照组基础上加用正性同化护理,对两组干预后的HHI评分、快速康复依从性好的比例、康复指标、术后肺部并发症发生率等观察指标进行比较.结果:观察组HHI评分为(12.60±1.13)分、(12.53±0.99)分、(12.58±1.24)分,高于对照组[(9.25±1.13)分、(9.18±1.34)分、(10.35±0.86)分],差异均有统计学意义(t 值分别为 13.291、12.747、9.322,P值均<0.05).观察组快速康复依从性好的比例为97.50%(39/40),高于对照组的80.00%(32/40),差异有统计学意义(x2=6.135,P=0.013).观察组首次离床活动时间、胸腔引流管留置时长、总住院时长、术后疼痛评分分别为(6.13±1.32)h、(22.60±1.50)h、(12.48±1.54)d、(2.83±1.13)分,低于对照组[(11.25±1.19)h、(27.38±2.07)h、(18.35±2.09)d、(4.33±1.12)分],差异均有统计学意义(t 值分别为-18.187、—11.811、一 14.306、-5.968,P值均<0.05);术后肺部并发症发生率为5.00%(2/40),与对照组[22.50%(9/40)]比较,差异无统计学意义(x2=3.794,P>0.05).结论:采用正性同化护理联合MDT-ERAS链式护理对肺癌手术患者实施干预,可提升患者希望水平与快速康复依从性,实现安全快速康复目标.

Objective:To analyze the effect of combining positive assimilation nursing with MDT-ERAS chain nursing on patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung resection for lung cancer.Methods:Eighty patients with lung cancer who underwent single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy at Putian University Affiliated Hospital from January to December 2024 were selected as the observation sample.The patients were randomly assigned to two groups by a coin toss.The control group(40 patients)received MDT-ERAS chain nursing,while the study group(40 patients)received MDT-ERAS chain nursing combined with positive assimilation nursing.After the intervention,the two groups' HHI scores,rapid recovery compliance rates,rehabilitation indices,and postoperative pulmonary complication rates were compared.Results:The HHI scores in the study group were(12.60±1.13)points,(12.53±0.99)points,and(12.58±1.24)points,respectively,significantly higher than the corresponding scores in the control group((9.25±1.13)points,(9.18±1.34)points,(10.35±0.86)points,respectively).These differences were statistically significant(t=13.291,12.747,9.322;P<0.05).The rapid recovery compliance rate was 97.50%(39/40)in the study group,which was higher than 80.00%(32/40)in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(x2=6.135,P=0.013).The time to first ambulation,duration of chest drainage tube placement,total hospital stay,and postoperative pain score in the study group were(6.13±1.32)hours,(22.60±1.50)hours,(12.48±1.54)days,and(2.83±1.13)points,respectively.These values were lower than those in the control group((11.25±1.19)hours,(27.38±2.07)hours,(18.35±2.09)days,(4.33±1.12)points,respectively),and the differences were statistically significant(t=-18.187,—11.811,—14.306,-5.968,P<0.05).The postoperative pulmonary complication rate was 5.00%(2/40)in the study group and 22.50%(9/40)in the control group,with no statistically significant difference(x2=3.794.P>0.05).Conclusion:Combining positive assimilation nursing with MDT-ERAS chain nursing in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery improves patients' hope level and rapid recovery compliance,which helps achieve the goal of safe and rapid recovery.

郑丽晶

莆田学院附属医院胸心外科,莆田 351100

医药卫生

癌,非小细胞肺康复护理对比研究

Carcinoma,non-small-cell lungRehabilitation nursingComparative study

《结核与肺部疾病杂志》 2026 (3)

333-337,5

10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.20250139

评论