地方政府债务、金融资源错配与乡村产业振兴OA

Against the backdrop of persistently declining global fertility rates,understanding the formation mechanisms and enhancement pathways of fertility intentions has become critical for addressing population sustainability challenges.Drawing on methodologies from graph visualization and bibliometric mapping analysis,this study systematically compares Chinese and international scholarly literature on fertility in-tentions published over the past two decades.While both bodies of literature examine fertility intentions through the lenses of individual characteristics,family structure,and institutional context,their emphases diverge significantly.Chinese scholarship is deeply grounded in the context of China's rapid social trans-formation,prioritizing macro-level factors-including opportunity costs associated with education and ca-reer advancement,the influence of traditional cultural norms,childcare expenditures,policy reforms(e.g.,the two-child and three-child policies),and urban-rural disparities-and exhibits a pronounced policy-oriented orientation.In contrast,the international literature centers on micro-level psychological mechanisms,gender equity dynamics,accessibility and quality of reproductive health services,and the evolving,interactive processes underlying family decision-making-thereby cultivating a pluralistic,multi-method research paradigm.Analysis of highly co-cited works reveals a shared conceptual conver-gence around the"unwilling-afraid-unable"attribution framework for low fertility.Yet the explanatory pathways differ markedly:Chinese studies predominantly adopt an institutional-structural lens,whereas international research integrates individual-level psychological dispositions with cross-national compari-sons of welfare state arrangements.These divergences reflect fundamental differences in welfare regimes and national developmental stages,offering both theoretical insights and empirically grounded implications for China's population governance strategies.