首页|期刊导航|重庆理工大学学报|数据竞争中用户隐私保护路径的重构

数据竞争中用户隐私保护路径的重构OA

Reconfiguring the path to user privacy protection in data competition

中文摘要英文摘要

在数据竞争中,隐私的整合性及其伤害的无感性导致侵权用户隐私的频次与形式在持续增加.个人信息保护法因用户意思表示不自由、数据权利归属不明、难以举证等问题无法有效保护隐私;竞争法虽有介入用户隐私保护的正当性,但仍存在保护不足的困境.现有理论和实践分化为两种路径:私法救济即用户在数据竞争中的隐私权受到侵害时可以依法提起民事诉讼等来维护自身权益;公法救济即竞争执法机构通过竞争执法,尤其反垄断执法的方式保护.这两种路径均存在难以实现全面维护用户隐私、使用门槛高等问题,需革新监管理念:在保护用户隐私过程中,将监管重心从行为主义转向主体主义,从事后主义转向事前主义.在具体路径上,首先应明确竞争法介入用户隐私保护的判断标准,即经营者的行为是否同时损害用户隐私和市场竞争秩序;其次,完善竞争法保护用户隐私的工具;最后,实现用户隐私保护监管合作与信息共享.

In data competition,the frequency and methods of infringing on user privacy continue to increase due to the integrated nature of privacy and the imperceptibility of harm.The Personal Information Protection Law struggles to safeguard user privacy in data competition due to problems such as a lack of free will in expression among users,unclear data ownership,and difficulties in adducing evidence.Although competition law has the legitimacy to intervening in user privacy protection,it still faces the dilemma of inadequate protection.Regarding user privacy protection pathways in data competition,existing theories and practices diverge into two distinct approaches.The first is the private law remedy pathway,where users whose privacy rights are infringed in data competition can initiate civil litigation in accordance with the law to protect their interests.The second is the public law remedy pathway,where competition enforcement agencies intervene through competition law enforcement,especially antitrust law enforcement.Both approaches have problems such as difficulties in comprehensively safeguarding user privacy and high use thresholds,which requires innovating the concept of user privacy protection regulation.On one hand,we should shift the focus of regulation from behaviorism to subjectivism in protecting user privacy.On the other hand,we should shift the focus of regulation from ex post to ex ante.As for the specific path of protecting user privacy in data competition,we should first clarify the judgment criteria for competition law intervention in user privacy protection—namely,whether operators simultaneously harm user privacy and the order of market competition;secondly,we should improve the tools for competition law to protect user privacy must be refined;finally,regulatory cooperation and information sharing for user privacy protection must be achieved.

王明泽

中国社会科学院 法学研究所,北京 100720

社会科学

数据竞争用户隐私私法救济公法救济监管合作

data competitionuser privacyprivate law remedypublic law remedyregulatory coopera-tion

《重庆理工大学学报》 2026 (8)

1-11,11

国家社会科学基金一般项目"平台反垄断理论问题研究"(21BFX115)国家资助博士后研究人员计划项目"数据竞争法律规则研究"(GZC20241965)

10.3969/j.issn.1674-8425(s).2026.04.001

评论