首页|期刊导航|针灸临床杂志|"筋骨平衡"下筋针疗法联合手法治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病的疗效分析

"筋骨平衡"下筋针疗法联合手法治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病的疗效分析OA

Efficacy Analysis of Tendon Needling Therapy Combined with Manipulative Techniques for TMD under Concept of Tendon-Bone Balance

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:观察筋针疗法联合手法治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)的临床疗效.方法:选择2023年12月—2024年11月本院收治的126例TMD患者,随机分为联用组、手法组两组.手法组进行以旋枕法为主的正骨手法治疗;而联用组则在手法组的基础上加入筋针疗法,两组均干预4周.采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)在干预前、干预1周、2周和4周分别评估两组患者疼痛程度;在干预前和干预4周采用关节活动度和Fricton指数来评估两组患者的颞下颌关节功能;采用下颌功能损害问卷(MFIQ)及用口腔健康影响程度量表-14中文版(OHIP-14)来评估两组患者的日常生活活动能力及生活质量,同时采集两组患者干预前后健侧和患侧肌电信号,并评估临床疗效.结果:在VAS方面,治疗方法和时间在VAS评分存在交互作用,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).除手法组的治疗1周一项指标以外,两组在干预各个时间的VAS评分均低于治疗前,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).联用组在治疗1周、2周、4周的VAS评分低于手法组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).在Fricton指数多个指标,除JN 一项以外,联用组在JP、MP、MM、DI、PI及CMI均低于手法组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).联用组在MMO、患侧RMS均高于手法组,在MFIQ、OHIP-14均低于手法组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组临床疗效经秩和检验,联合组高于手法组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),而联合组总有效率98.41%(62/63),高于手法组的96.72%(59/61),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:筋针疗法联合正骨手法,可以缓解TMD患者的疼痛,改善功能障碍,提高日常生活能力和生活质量.

Objective:To observe the clinical efficacy of tendon needle therapy combined with manipulative techniques in treatment of temporomandibular joint disorder(TMD).Methods:A total of 126 patients with TMD were randomly divided into the combined therapy group and the manipulative techniques group.The manipulative techniques group was treated with orthopedic manipulation primarily based on the rotational cervical technique;on which basis,the combined therapy group was also treated with tendon needling.Both groups underwent interventions for 4 weeks.Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale(VAS)at baseline and at 1,2,and 4 weeks after intervention.Temporomandibular joint function was evaluated using joint range of motion and the Fricton index at baseline and after 4 weeks.Daily living activity and quality of life were assessed using the Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire(MFIQ)and the Chinese version of the Oral Health Impact Profile-14(OHIP-14).Electromyographic signals of the affected and unaffected sides were recorded before and after the intervention,and overall clinical efficacy was evaluated.Results:In terms of VAS scores,there was a significant interaction between treatment method and time(P<0.05);except for the 1-week measurement in the manipulative technique group,VAS scores at all time points after intervention were significantly lower than baseline in both groups(P<0.05);the combined therapy group showed lower VAS scores than the manipulative technique group at 1,2,and 4 weeks post-treatment(P<0.05).In terms of Fricton index,the combined therapy group had lower JP,MP,MM,DI,PI,and CMI than the manipulative technique group(P<0.05),except for the JN parameter;MMO and RMS on the affected side were higher in the combined therapy group compared to the manipulative technique group(P<0.05);scores of MFIQ and OHIP-14 were lower in the combined therapy group(P<0.05).The clinical efficacy between the two groups was analyzed wsing the rank-sum test.The combined therapy group showed significantly better dinical efficacy than the manipulative techniques group(P<0.05).Although the total effective ratc in the combrired therapy group was 98.41%(62/63)which was higher than 96.72%(59/61)in the maipllative group,the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusion:Tendon needling therapy combined with orthopedic manipulation can effectively alleviate pain,improve functional impairment,and enhance daily living ability and quality of life in patients with TMD.

赵娟妮;余飞;王婷;苟翔;晏姣;马鑫;庞日朝

中国人民解放军西部战区总医院,四川成都 610083中国人民解放军西部战区总医院,四川成都 610083中国人民解放军西部战区总医院,四川成都 610083中国人民解放军西部战区总医院,四川成都 610083中国人民解放军西部战区总医院,四川成都 610083中国人民解放军西部战区总医院,四川成都 610083中国人民解放军西部战区总医院,四川成都 610083

医药卫生

颞下颌关节紊乱病筋骨平衡筋针疗法正骨手法浅刺多捻法龙虎交战法

Temporomandibular joint disorderTendon-bone balanceTendon needling therapyOrthopedic manipulationSuperficial twisting needling techniqueDragon-tiger counteraction technique

《针灸临床杂志》 2026 (5)

19-24,6

中国人民解放军西部战区总医院课题,编号:2021-XZYG-C24、2024-YGLC-B11.

10.19917/j.cnki.1005-0779.026084

评论