首页|期刊导航|中国医院用药评价与分析|基于马尔可夫模型的盐酸伊立替康脂质体治疗胰腺癌的药物经济学评价

基于马尔可夫模型的盐酸伊立替康脂质体治疗胰腺癌的药物经济学评价OA

Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Irinotecan Hydrochloride Liposome in the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer Based on Markov Model

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:基于已公开发表的 PAN-HEROIC-1临床研究数据,从我国医疗卫生系统视角,分析盐酸伊立替康脂质体联合 5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)与亚叶酸钙(LV)方案,相较于安慰剂联合 5-FU/LV 方案,用于吉西他滨治疗失败的局部晚期或转移性胰腺癌患者的经济学价值.方法:借助 RStudio 软件构建马尔可夫模型,以 2 周为 1 个循环周期,模拟时长设定为 10 年.选取总成本、质量调整生命年(QALY)、增量成本-效果比(ICER)作为核心评价指标,对比盐酸伊立替康脂质体联合 5-FU/LV 方案与安慰剂联合5-FU/LV 方案的经济性.通过不确定性分析验证基础分析结果的可靠性,并开展情境分析探索特定条件下的方案价值.结果:基础分析结果显示,与安慰剂联合 5-FU/LV 方案相比,盐酸伊立替康脂质体联合 5-FU/LV 方案的 ICER 为 541 715.23 元/QALY,高于意愿支付(WTP)阈值(286 345.16 元/QALY),不具备经济性.单因素敏感性分析结果表明,无进展生存期效用、盐酸伊立替康脂质体成本是影响 ICER 的关键因素.概率敏感性分析结果显示,在当前 WTP 阈值范围内,盐酸伊立替康脂质体联合 5-FU/LV方案更具有经济性的概率为 0.情境分析结果显示,当所有患者均接受援助项目时,盐酸伊立替康脂质体联合 5-FU/LV 方案的ICER 降至 284 693.64 元/QALY,低于 WTP 阈值,体现出经济学优势.结论:盐酸伊立替康脂质体联合 5-FU/LV 方案用于吉西他滨治疗失败的局部晚期或转移性胰腺癌患者的二线治疗时,不具备经济性;但在全面覆盖援助项目的条件下,该方案可展现出经济学优势.

OBJECTIVE:Based on the publicly available clinical trial data of PAN-HEROIC-1,from the perspective of China's medical and health system,to analyze the economic value of the regimen of irinotecan hydrochloride liposome combined with 5-fluorouracil(5-FU)and leucovorin(LV),compared with the placebo combined with 5-FU/LV regimen,for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer with failed gemcitabine therapy.METHODS:The Markov model was constructed by using RStudio software,with a 2-week cycle and a simulation duration of 10 years.Total cost,quality-adjusted life years(QALY),and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio(ICER)were selected as the core evaluation indicators to compare the economic efficiency of irinotecan hydrochloride liposome combined with 5-FU/LV regimen and placebo combined with 5-FU/LV regimen.Uncertainty analysis was conducted to verify the reliability of the base-case analysis results,and scenario analysis was performed to explore the regimen value under special conditions.RESULTS:The base-case analysis showed that,compared with the placebo combined with 5-FU/LV regimen,the ICER of irinotecan hydrochloride liposome combined with 5-FU/LV regimen was 541 715.23 RMB per QALY,which was higher than the willingness-to-pay(WTP)threshold(286 345.16 RMB per QALY),indicating a lack of economic efficiency.One-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that progression-free survival utility and the cost of irinotecan hydrochloride liposome were the key factors affecting ICER.Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that within the current WTP threshold range,the probability of irinotecan hydrochloride liposome combined with 5-FU/LV regimen being more cost-effective was 0.Scenario analysis indicated that when all patients met the eligibility criteria for patient assistance program,the ICER of irinotecan hydrochloride liposome combined with 5-FU/LV regimen decreased to 284 693.64 RMB per QALY,which was lower than the WTP threshold,reflecting economic advantages.CONCLUSIONS:Irinotecan hydrochloride liposome combined with 5-FU/LV regimen does not exhibit economic efficiency as a second-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer with failed gemcitabine therapy.However,the regimen can demonstrate economic advantages under the condition of full coverage of patient assistance program.

崔蓉;霍丽曼;李东;贾会贤;冯锐

河北医科大学第四医院药学部,石家庄 050011河北医科大学第四医院药学部,石家庄 050011河北医科大学第四医院药学部,石家庄 050011河北医科大学第四医院药学部,石家庄 050011河北医科大学第四医院药学部,石家庄 050011

医药卫生

盐酸伊立替康脂质体胰腺癌药物经济学马尔可夫模型成本-效用分析

Irinotecan hydrochloride liposomePancreatic cancerPharmacoeconomicsMarkov modelCost-utility analysis

《中国医院用药评价与分析》 2026 (5)

592-596,5

河北省2026年度医学科学研究课题计划项目(No.20260525)

10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2026.05.017

评论