万古霉素联合哌拉西林他唑巴坦的急性肾损伤风险:一项倾向性匹配的病例对照研究OA
Risk of Acute Kidney Injury Associated with the Combination of Vancomycin and Piperacillin-Tazobactam:a Propensity Score-Matched Case-Control Study
目的:探讨万古霉素(VAN)联合哌拉西林他唑巴坦(PTZ)、头孢吡肟(FEP)或美罗培南(MEN)治疗时患者急性肾损伤(AKI)发生风险及临床结局的差异.方法:回顾性收集该院2016 年1 月至2022 年12 月接受 VAN 联合 PTZ(VAN+PTZ 组)、VAN联合 FEP 或 MEN(VAN+FEP/MEN 组)治疗>48 h 的成年住院患者资料.以 VAN+PTZ 组为基准,选取共 8 个协变量,包括性别、年龄>65 岁、VAN 日剂量>1 g、VAN 疗程>7 d、基线血肌酐、合并败血症、休克及联用肾毒性药物,采用倾向性评分匹配(PSM)以 1∶1的比例分别与 VAN+FEP/MEN 组进行匹配,以平衡基线特征.结局指标包括 AKI 发生率、严重程度(根据KDIGO 分期)、住院期间全因死亡率以及 AKI 患者的肾功能结局.结果:共纳入 VAN+PTZ 组 121 例,VAN+FEP/MEN 组3 326 例.经 PSM 后,每组各匹配 119 例,基线特征均衡.PSM 匹配后,两组患者 AKI 发生率的差异无统计学意义[21.8%(26/119)vs.18.5%(22/119),P=0.518];两组患者住院期间死亡率一致,均为 4.2%(5/119),差异无统计学意义(P=1.000);两组患者 AKI 严重程度分期、肾功能好转或恢复率的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).VAN+PTZ 组监测 VAN 谷浓度的 AKI 患者比例高于 VAN+FEP/MEN 组,差异有统计学意义[76.9%(20/26)vs.45.5%(10/22),P=0.025].结论:与 VAN+FEP/MEN 相比,VAN+PTZ 可能不会增加 AKI 发生风险,两种方案 AKI 的严重程度及临床结局相似.在治疗药物监测下,VAN+PTZ 可作为临床抗感染治疗的安全选择之一.
OBJECTIVE:To probe into the risk of acute kidney injury(AKI)and differences in clinical outcomes in patients treated with vancomycin(VAN)combined with piperacillin-tazobactam(PTZ),cefepime(FEP)or meropenem(MEN).METHODS:Retrospective data on adult inpatients who received VAN combined with PTZ,FEP or MEN for more than 48 hours from Jan.2016 to Dec.2022 were collected.Taking VAN+PTZ as the reference,8 covariates were selected,including gender,age>65 years,VAN daily dose>1 g,treatment duration of VAN>7 d,baseline serum creatinine,sepsis,shock,and concomitant nephrotoxic medications.A 1∶1 porpensity score matching(PSM)was performed between VAN+PTZ and VAN+FEP/MEN group to balance baseline characteristics.Outcomes included AKI incidence,AKI severity(according to KDIGO criteria),in-hospital all-cause mortality,and renal outcomes in patients with AKI.RESULTS:A total of 121 patients were enrolled in the VAN+PTZ group and 3,326 cases were enrolled in the VAN+FEP/MEN group.After PSM,119 patients were included in each group,with balanced baseline characteristics.No statistically significant differences were found in AKI incidence between two groups[21.8%(26/119)vs.18.5%(22/119),P=0.518].The in-hospital mortality was consistent between two groups[4.2%(5/119)],with no significant difference(P=1.000).There were no significant differences in the grading of AKI severity or the rates of improvement/recovery in renal function(P>0.05).The proportion of AKI patients with VAN trough concentration was higher in the VAN+PTZ group than that in VAN+FEP/MEN group[76.9%(20/26)vs.45.5%(10/22),P=0.025].CONCLUSIONS:Compared with VAN+FEP/MEN,VAN+PTZ may not increase the risk of AKI,with similar findings observed for both AKI severity and clinical outcomes.VAN+PTZ can be considered a safe therapeutic option for clinical anti-infective treatment when supported by therapeutic drug monitoring.
左成淳;张颖;王玉珠;吕迁洲;潘坤明;李晓宇
复旦大学附属中山医院药剂科,上海 200032复旦大学附属中山医院药剂科,上海 200032复旦大学附属中山医院药剂科,上海 200032复旦大学附属中山医院药剂科,上海 200032复旦大学附属中山医院药剂科,上海 200032复旦大学附属中山医院药剂科,上海 200032
医药卫生
万古霉素哌拉西林他唑巴坦美罗培南头孢吡肟急性肾损伤
VancomycinPiperacillin tazobactamMeropenemCefepimeAcute kidney injury
《中国医院用药评价与分析》 2026 (5)
524-528,5
国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.82204520)上海市卫生健康委员会(No.20244Y0101)上海市青年医学人才-临床药师项目[No.SHWSRS(2023)_106]吴阶平医学基金会(No.320.6750.2024-18-12)
评论