首页|期刊导航|中国人口·资源与环境|绿色金融发展能够改善企业ESG绩效吗

绿色金融发展能够改善企业ESG绩效吗OA

Can the development of green finance improve corporate ESG performance:an analysis from the perspective of evolutionary game

中文摘要英文摘要

企业践行环境、社会与治理(environmental,social and governance,ESG)理念是推动全面绿色低碳转型的关键.探究绿色金融发展影响企业ESG绩效的微观机制,对中国完善绿色金融体系、更好地引导企业改善ESG绩效、实现绿色低碳发展具有重要意义.该研究构建金融机构-低环境风险企业-高环境风险企业三方演化博弈模型,讨论企业进行绿色技术创新或漂绿策略成立的理论情形,并进行数值仿真分析.在理论分析基础上,采用中国2010-2022年A股上市公司非平衡面板数据,实证检验绿色金融发展对企业ESG绩效的差异化影响及其机制.研究发现:①绿色金融发展整体上对提高企业ESG绩效具有促进效应,这一结果在使用工具变量法、SYS-GMM方法替换基准模型以及DID方法检验外生政策冲击等一系列稳健性检验后依旧可靠;促进效应在高融资约束企业和低声誉企业中更为显著.②对于低环境风险企业,绿色金融发展有助于推动其绿色技术创新,促进其ESG绩效提升.③对于高环境风险企业,绿色金融发展诱发漂绿,虚假地提高其ESG绩效.④政府奖补强化绿色金融发展对低环境风险企业ESG绩效的促进作用,而环境规制则弱化绿色金融发展对高环境风险企业ESG绩效的促进作用.研究结果深化了对绿色金融差异化影响企业ESG绩效及其微观机制的认识,为绿色金融促进绿色技术创新的同时抑制漂绿,推动经济社会全面绿色低碳转型提供一定的理论支撑与政策启示.

Corporate implementation of ESG principles serves as a critical driver of comprehensive green and low-carbon transforma-tion.Clarifying the micro-mechanisms through which green finance development impacts corporate ESG performance is of significant importance for China to improve its green finance system,guide enterprises to enhance ESG performance,and achieve green and low-carbon development.This study constructed a tripartite evolutionary game model involving financial institutions,low environmental risk enterprises,and high environmental risk enterprises.It theoretically examined scenarios where enterprises adopt green technological in-novation or engage in greenwashing strategies and conducted numerical simulation analysis.Based on theoretical analysis,this study empirically tested the differentiated impacts of green finance development on corporate ESG performance and its underlying mecha-nisms using unbalanced panel data of Chinaʹs Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2022.Key findings in-clude:① Green finance development overall had a promoting effect on improving corporate ESG performance.This result remained ro-bust after a series of rigorous robustness tests,including instrumental variable(IV)methods,the system GMM(SYS-GMM)method re-placing the baseline model,and the difference-in-differences(DID)method to assess exogenous policy shocks.The promoting effect was more pronounced among high financing-constrained enterprises and low-reputation enterprises.② For low environmental risk enterpris-es,green finance development drove green technological innovation,thereby enhancing their ESG performance.③ For high environ-mental risk enterprises,green finance development incentivized greenwashing,leading to artificial inflation of their ESG performance.④ Government subsidies amplified the promoting effect of green finance development on ESG performance for low environmental risk enterprises,whereas environmental regulations weakened the promoting effect of green finance development on ESG performance for high environmental risk enterprises.This study demonstrated that green finance development facilitated green technological innovation and ESG performance improvements among low environmental risk enterprises but tended to induce greenwashing among high environ-mental risk enterprises,necessitating enhanced detection and suppression of greenwashing activities among such firms.The findings deepen understanding of the differentiated effects of green finance on corporate ESG performance and their micro-mechanisms,offering theoretical support and policy implications for refining green finance systems to promote green technological innovation,curb green-washing,and advance comprehensive economic and social green and low-carbon transformation.

马兆良;费正东

安徽大学经济学院,安徽 合肥 230601||安徽大学创新发展研究院,安徽 合肥 230039安徽大学经济学院,安徽 合肥 230601

管理科学

绿色金融ESG绩效环境信息披露绿色技术创新漂绿演化博弈

green financecorporate ESG performanceenvironmental information disclosuregreen technological innovationgreen-washingevolutionary game

《中国人口·资源与环境》 2026 (4)

160-175,16

国家社会科学基金项目"'双循环'新格局下制造业高质量发展的驱动机制、效果测度及提升研究"(批准号:21CJY050)安徽省社会科学创新发展研究课题攻关项目"数字赋能安徽制造业绿色转型的机制与路径优化研究"(批准号:2023CX029).

10.12062/cpre.20250910

评论