首页|期刊导航|中国人口·资源与环境|考虑碳边境调节机制的中国高耗能行业脱碳技术与能源需求评估

考虑碳边境调节机制的中国高耗能行业脱碳技术与能源需求评估OA

Assessing decarbonization technologies and energy demand in China's energy-intensive industries under the carbon border adjustment mechanism

中文摘要英文摘要

中国高耗能行业在碳边境调节机制下面临严峻复杂的风险挑战.碳边境调节机制如何影响高耗能行业的脱碳技术选择和能源需求值得细致深入地研究.为此,该研究选取粗钢、铝冶炼、水泥熟料和合成氨4类代表性高耗能行业,利用平准化生产成本模型,基于Logit的市场份额模型和终端能源消费分解的能源需求模型模拟碳边境调节机制下的脱碳技术选择和能源需求,并探究差别电价设计、生产布局优化和低碳转型融资3类政策工具的实际作用.结果显示:①在以欧盟为代表的发达经济体的现行碳价水平下,具备再生资源循环技术的粗钢和铝冶炼行业展现出较强的脱碳经济性,而合成氨和水泥熟料行业的脱碳经济性较差;②通过生产布局优化引导高耗能行业向西北地区转移,可以较好地提升脱碳经济性,而差别电价设计主要作用于电力密集型的铝冶炼行业;③高耗能行业的能源需求结构变动呈现煤炭需求下降和一次电力需求提升的趋势,其中粗钢和铝冶炼行业对这一变化趋势的贡献最大.为应对碳边境调节机制,该研究建议短期内应以技术成熟度高的再生资源循环技术为核心,中长期则应关注碳捕集封存技术与绿氢技术,推动高耗能行业深度脱碳.政策激励应聚焦生产布局优化领域,在此基础上辅以差别电价设计.西北地区在可再生能源领域具有天然优势,将高耗能行业向该区域梯度转移,可以利用西北地区的低碳资源优势为高耗能行业转型提供低成本解决方案.此外,能源发展规划应前瞻性地考虑碳边境调节机制等外部气候贸易壁垒的影响.

China's energy-intensive industries face severe and complex risk challenges under the carbon border adjustment mecha-nism(CBAM),highlighting the need to examine how CBAM affects the choice of decarbonization technologies and changes in energy de-mand within these industries.This study selected four representative energy-intensive industries—steel,aluminum smelting,cement clinker,and synthetic ammonia—utilizing a levelized production cost model,a Logit-based market share model,and an end-use energy decomposition model to simulate the selection of decarbonization technologies and changes in energy demand under CBAM.The study further examined the impacts of three policy tools:differentiated electricity pricing,production layout optimization,and low-carbon tran-sition financing.The results showed that:① At the current carbon price levels of developed economies represented by the EU,indus-tries such as steel and aluminum smelting,which possessed recycled resource circular technologies,exhibited better decarbonization economic viability,while synthetic ammonia and cement clinker industries showed poorer economic performance.② Guiding the relo-cation of energy-intensive industries to northwestern China could effectively enhance decarbonization economic viability,while differen-tiated electricity pricing primarily impacted the electricity-intensive aluminum smelting industry.③ The energy demand structure of en-ergy-intensive industries showed a trend of declining coal demand and increasing primary electricity demand,with steel and aluminum smelting contributing the most to this trend.This study suggests that,in the short term,the response to CBAM should focus on recycled resource circular technologies with high maturity,while in the medium to long term,the deployment of carbon capture and storage(CCS)and green hydrogen technologies should be prioritized to enable deep decarbonization in energy-intensive industries.Policy incentive tools should primarily focus on production layout optimization,supplemented by differentiated electricity pricing designs.The north-western region has natural advantages in renewable energy.Transferring energy-intensive industries to this region in a stepwise manner can leverage the low-carbon resource advantages of the northwest to provide low-cost solutions for industry transformation.Furthermore,energy planning should proactively consider the impact of external climate trade barriers such as CBAM.

赵恒松;林伯强

厦门大学管理学院中国能源政策研究院,福建 厦门 361005厦门大学管理学院中国能源政策研究院,福建 厦门 361005

管理科学

碳边境调节机制高耗能行业平准化生产成本脱碳技术能源需求

carbon border adjustment mechanismenergy-intensive industrieslevelized production costdecarbonization technologyenergy demand

《中国人口·资源与环境》 2026 (4)

49-60,12

国家自然科学基金重点项目"碳中和框架下的能源产业升级、环境污染治理与经济高质量发展"(批准号:72133003)厦门大学"双一流"文科提升计划建设子项目"能源经济与能源政策协同创新中心".

10.12062/cpre.20251004

评论