首页|期刊导航|中国临床药学杂志|2型糖尿病患者药学服务质量评价与影响因素分析

2型糖尿病患者药学服务质量评价与影响因素分析OA

Quality evaluation and analysis of influencing factors of pharmaceutical care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 构建2型糖尿病药学服务质量评价体系,识别服务中存在的问题并分析其影响因素.方法 选取2022年10月至2023年4月住院的182例2型糖尿病患者.基于结构-过程-结果(SPO)模型构建包含19项二级指标的评价体系,采用德尔菲法和属性层次模型(AHM)确定指标权重.由临床药师与社区药师协作开展为期6个月的药学服务干预,采用加权逼近理想解排序(TOPSIS)法计算每例患者的药学服务质量评分,并运用单因素及多重线性回归分析影响因素.结果 所有患者的药学服务质量评分为(0.570 9±0.076 6)分,整体水平有待提升,失分较多的指标集中在降糖药物费用与疾病控制方面.不同的年龄、家庭收入、病程、肾病分期、降糖药物治疗策略以及是否存在下肢血管病变的2型糖尿病患者,在药学服务质量评分上差异均存在统计学意义(P<0.05);年龄(β=0.161)、家庭年收入(β=0.224)、胰岛素的使用(联合治疗β=0.286,单用β=0.211)与药学服务质量呈正相关,病程(β=-0.165)、糖尿病肾病分期(β=-0.304)与药学服务质量均呈负相关(P<0.05).结论 应重点关注年轻、病程长、肾病严重、经济条件有限及非胰岛素治疗的患者群体,应用多元化的药学服务手段,提升处方管理力度和疾病控制水平,从而整体提高药学服务质量.

AIM To establish a quality evaluation system for pharmaceutical care in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM),identify existing problems,and analyze influencing factors.METHODS A total of 182 hospitalized T2DM patients were selected from October 2022 to April 2023.An evaluation framework comprising 19 secondary indicators was constructed based on the structure-process-outcome(SPO)model.The Delphi method and the attribute hierarchy model(AHM)were employed to determine indicator weights.A six-month pharmaceutical care intervention was delivered collaboratively by clinical and community pharmacists.The weighted technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution(TOPSIS)was used to calculate individual service quality scores,while univariate analysis and multiple linear regression were applied to identify influencing factors.RESULTS The mean pharmaceutical care quality score for all patients was 0.570 9±0.076 6,suggesting moderate overall performance with room for improvement.Indicators related to antidiabetic medication costs and disease control accounted for the greatest reductions in score.Significant differences in quality scores were observed among patients when stratified by age,household income,disease duration,diabetic nephropathy stage,glucose-lowering treatment strategy,and presence of lower extremity vascular disease(all P<0.05).Multiple linear regression indicated that age(β=0.161),annual household income(β=0.224),and insulin-based therapy(β=0.286 for combination regimens;β=0.211 for monotherapy)were positively associated with pharmaceutical care quality.In contrast,disease duration(β=-0.165)and diabetic nephropathy stage(β=-0.304)showed negative correlations with service quality(all P<0.05).CONCLUSION Greater attention should be paid to younger patients,those with longer disease duration,severe kidney disease,limited economic resources,and those on non-insulin regimens.Implementing diversified pharmaceutical care strategies to enhance prescription management and disease control is essential for improving the overall quality of pharmaceutical services.

唐恒;王盛付;高峰;唐昀;陈志锋

铜陵市立医院药学部,铜陵 244099铜陵市立医院药学部,铜陵 244099铜陵市翠湖社区新城花园卫生服务站,铜陵 244002铜陵市天井湖社区天桥卫生服务站,铜陵 244021铜陵市立医院药学部,铜陵 244099

医药卫生

药学服务质量评价2型糖尿病属性层次模型加权逼近理想解排序法影响因素

pharmaceutical service quality evaluationtype 2 diabetes mellitusattribute hierarchy modeltechnique for order preference by similarity to ideal solutioninfluencing factor

《中国临床药学杂志》 2026 (4)

295-301,7

安徽省高等学校科学研究项目(编号2024AH051879)皖南医学院教学医院科研专项(编号JXYY202298)

10.19577/j.1007-4406.2026.04.002

评论