首页|期刊导航|中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版)|生成式人工智能驱动公共服务共同生产的内在逻辑与风险应对

生成式人工智能驱动公共服务共同生产的内在逻辑与风险应对OACHSSCD

The Intrinsic Logic and Risk Governance of Generative AI-Driven Public Services Co-Production

中文摘要英文摘要

随着数智技术的不断迭代,生成式人工智能已成为公共服务共同生产的核心行动者之一,与传统生产主体共同形成"政府-公众-技术"三元耦合的共同生产新质态.生成式人工智能通过重塑共同生产的目标指向、激活社会公众的自主参与以及催生主体合作的桥接环境,系统性驱动公共服务的共同生产.然而,生成式人工智能也存在一定的嵌入性风险,算法黑箱、技术垄断和数字伦理等问题会给政府与公众的合作边界、协同动机与价值共识带来不利影响,进而阻碍公共服务共同生产的可持续性.为规避上述风险,推动技术赋能向善,需从三方面建构应对之策:一是以制度规范技术,通过完善法律规定、健全权责清单、实施全过程治理,明晰主体合作的行动边界;二是以组织重塑技术,通过增强组织韧性、营造协同文化、培育数字能力,激发共同生产的内生动力;三是以技术治理技术,通过建立监管沙盒、设立熔断机制、推进可信人工智能,聚合政民协同的伦理共识.围绕生成式人工智能驱动公共服务共同生产逻辑与过程的讨论,回应了数智时代如何借助技术实现主体合作进而推动公共服务高质量供给的理论与实践关切.

With the continuous iteration of digital intelligence technology,generative artificial intelligence(AI)has become one of the core actors in public services co-production,forming a new joint production state of"government-public-technology"together with traditional actors.Generative AI systematically drives the co-production of public services by reshaping the goal of co-production,activating the independent participation of the public and fostering the bridging environment of subject cooperation.However,there are also some embedded risks in generative AI,such as algorithm black box,technology monopoly and digital ethics,which will bring adverse effects on the cooperation boundary,synergistic motivation and value consensus between the government and the public,and thus hinder the sustainability of public service co-production.In order to avoid the above risks and promote technology for good,it is necessary to construct countermeasures from three aspects.First,regulating technology through institutional norms,which means clarifying the action boundary of subject cooperation by improving the legal framework,perfecting the list of powers and responsibilities,and implementing the whole process of governance.Second,reshaping technology through organizational construction,which means inspiring the endogenous motivation of co-production by enhancing organizational resilience,creating a collaborative culture,and cultivating digital abilities.Third,governing technology through technological means,which means gathering the ethical consensus of the government and the public by constructing a regulatory sandbox,establishing a circuit breaker mechanism,and promoting trustworthy AI.This study focuses on the discussion of the co-production logic and process of public services driven by generative AI,responding to the theoretical and practical concerns about how to achieve subject cooperation with technology so as to promote the high-quality supply of public services in the era of digital intelligence.

王杰;刘伟忠

扬州大学政府治理与公共政策研究中心扬州大学政府治理与公共政策研究中心

社会科学

生成式人工智能公共服务共同生产技术风险技术向善

generative artificial intelligencepublic services co-productiontechnological riskstechnology for good

《中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2026 (3)

95-112,18

国家社会科学基金一般项目"提升农村公共服务可及性的数智助推路径研究"(项目编号:24BZZ091)

10.20089/j.cnki.issn.1009-105x.2026.03.007

评论