首页|期刊导航|中国感染控制杂志|基于DeepSeek的医院感染智能判定系统构建及效能评价

基于DeepSeek的医院感染智能判定系统构建及效能评价OA

Construction and performance of DeepSeek-based artificial intelligence judgement system for healthcare-associated infection

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 构建基于DeepSeek大语言模型的医院感染(HAI)智能判定系统,评估其与传统单人判定模式的效能差异.方法 采用单中心回顾性研究,纳入大连医科大学附属第二医院2025年1-6月的出院病历,以5名资深感染控制专家盲法共识为金标准判定是否为 HAI,比较人工智能(AI)系统与单人判定在灵敏度、特异度、准确率、曲线下面积(AUC)及 Kappa值等方面的差异,并进行感染部位亚组分析和错误类型归纳.结果 根据专家金标准判定,本研究 HAI阳性136例、阴性184例.效能对比显示,AI系统在各效能指标上均优于单人判定:灵敏度(92.6%VS 84.6%)、准确率(93.8%VS 89.1%)、AUC(0.976 VS 0.897)及 Kappa值(0.869 VS 0.776),差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05).AI系统对不同感染部位的灵敏度均维持在94%以上,尤其在血流感染中明显优于人工(94.7%VS 73.7%,P=0.044).错误类型分析表明,AI误判主要源于非典型临床表现,而人工漏报多因病历阅读疏忽所致.结论 基于DeepSeek的 HAI智能判定系统具有较高的判别效能与稳定性,能够显著提升 HAI识别的灵敏度和标准化水平."AI初筛-人工终审"的人机协同模式可作为 HAI防控的智能化解决方案.

Objective To construct an artificial intelligence(AI)judgement system for healthcare-associated infec-tion(HAI)based on the DeepSeek large language model,evaluate its performance differences from traditional indi-vidual-based manual review.Methods A single-center retrospective study was conducted,medical records of discharged patients from the Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University between January and June 2025 were included for analysis,the blinded consensus of 5 senior infection control experts was used as the gold standard to judge HAI,the differences in sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,area under the curve(AUC),and Kappa values of the AI system and individual review were compared,subgroup analysis based on infection sites and error type cate-gorization was also performed.Results According to the expert gold standard judgement,136 cases were positive and 184 cases were negative for HAI in this study.The performance comparison showed that the AI system outper-formed individual judgement in various performance indicators:sensitivity(92.6%vs 84.6%),accuracy(93.8%vs 89.1%),AUC(0.976 vs 0.897),and Kappa value(0.869 vs 0.776),with differences being statistically signi-ficant(all P<0.05).The sensitivity of the AI system to different infection sites remained above 94%,especially in bloodstream infection,which was significantly superior to manual review(94.7%vs 73.7%,P=0.044).Analysis of error types revealed that AI misjudgements were mainly caused by atypical clinical manifestations,while manual underreporting was often caused by negligence in reading medical records.Conclusion The DeepSeek-based AI judgement system for HAI demonstrates high judgement performance and stability,and can significantly improve the sensitivity and standardization of HAI recognition.The human-AI collaborative model of"AI initial screening-manual final review"can serve as an intelligent solution for HAI prevention and control.

范鹏超;高华聪;王倩;刘欣奕;刘文芝

大连医科大学附属第二医院疾病预防与医院感染控制部,辽宁 大连 116023大连医科大学附属第二医院疾病预防与医院感染控制部,辽宁 大连 116023大连医科大学附属第二医院疾病预防与医院感染控制部,辽宁 大连 116023大连医科大学附属第二医院疾病预防与医院感染控制部,辽宁 大连 116023大连医科大学附属第二医院疾病预防与医院感染控制部,辽宁 大连 116023

医药卫生

人工智能智能监测DeepSeek医院感染大语言模型

artificial intelligenceintelligent monitoringDeepSeekhealthcare-associated infectionlarge language model

《中国感染控制杂志》 2026 (5)

631-637,7

大连医科大学附属第二医院机关管理1+x课题(2024QNGL04)

10.12138/j.issn.1671-9638.20262906

评论