首页|期刊导航|森林工程|黑龙江省森林火后冠层垂直结构生态恢复轨迹

黑龙江省森林火后冠层垂直结构生态恢复轨迹OA

Research on the Vertical Structural Ecological Restoration Trajectory of the Forest Canopy after Forest Fires in Heilongjiang Province

中文摘要英文摘要

森林火灾是影响森林生态系统结构与功能的重要干扰因素,系统评估火后森林结构恢复过程对区域生态安全与经营管理具有重要意义.以黑龙江省森林火灾区域为研究对象,基于全球生态系统动力学调查(Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation,GEDI)激光雷达数据,结合时空替代方法(space-for-time substitution),系统分析森林火后0~35 a冠层垂直结构的生态恢复轨迹及其差异特征.选取相对高度分位数(RH25、RH50、RH75、RH98)、冠层覆盖度(CC)和植被面积指数(PAI)作为结构指标,通过构建过火区与未燃烧基准区的结构差值序列,采用50 km×50 km网格等权汇总方法,并结合Theil-Sen估计与空间块重采样,对森林结构恢复趋势的稳健性进行评估,进一步按生态区(大兴安岭、小兴安岭、长白山)分组比较火后恢复轨迹与恢复率差异,以及比较不同火烈度条件下的恢复差异.结果表明,火后森林结构恢复具有明显的层次性特征,中层高度结构(RH50)的恢复速率最高(约0.09 m/a),其35 a相对恢复率约为0.33;中上层与林冠顶高度结构(RH75、RH98)虽保持显著恢复趋势,但相对恢复率低于中层结构.冠层属性指标中,PAI的长期变化信号整体强于CC,提示不同冠层属性对火后恢复的响应阶段与持续性存在差异.火烈度对结构恢复具有显著影响,中重火区域在低层高度结构及冠层属性上的恢复趋势不显著,且长期恢复强度明显低于轻火区域.分生态区比较表明,三大生态区的恢复速率与相对恢复程度存在显著差异,差异主要体现在RH25、CC、PAI指标上,其中,长白山地区的恢复速率整体更高,而大兴安岭在低层与冠层属性指标上恢复受限更明显.研究表明,GEDI激光雷达结构参数能够有效分析区域尺度森林火后长期结构恢复过程,可为火后森林恢复评估与经营管理提供科学依据.

Forest fires are a major disturbance affecting the structure and functioning of forest ecosystems,and a system-atic assessment of post-fire forest structural recovery is essential for regional ecological security and forest management.Taking fire-affected forests in Heilongjiang Province as the study area,this study used global ecosystem dynamics investi-gation(GEDI)LiDAR data combined with a space-for-time substitution approach to analyze the ecological recovery tra-jectories of forest vertical structure during 0-35 years after fire and their variability.Relative height metrics(RH25,RH50,RH75,and RH98),canopy cover(CC),and plant area index(PAI)were selected as structural indicators.Structural difference series between burned areas and adjacent unburned reference areas were constructed,and a 50 km×50 km grid-based equal-weight aggregation scheme was applied.The robustness of forest structure recovery trends were evaluated using the Theil-Sen method together with spatial block resampling.Furthermore,the differences in post fire re-stroation trajectories and rates were compared by ecological zones(Great Khingan Mountains,Lesser Khingan Moun-tains,Changbai Mountains),as well as the recovery differences under varying fire severity levels.The results indicatd that post-fire forest structural recovery exhibits clear vertical stratification,with mid-canopy height(RH50)showing the strongest recovery signal,an average recovery rate of approximately 0.09 m/year,and a 35-year relative recovery ratio(RRR)of about 0.33;upper-canopy and canopy-top height metrics(RH75 and RH98)also displayed significant recovery trends but with lower relative recovery ratios than the mid-canopy layer.Among canopy attributes,PAI exhibited a more pronounced long-term change signal than CC,suggesting differences in response stages and persistence among canopy properties during post-fire recovery.Fire severity had a significant influence on structural recovery,as moderate-to high-severity burned areas showed non-significant recovery trends in lower-canopy height and canopy attributes,with substan-tially lower long-term recovery strength than low-severity burned areas.The comparison of ecological zones showed that there were significant differences in the recovery rate and relative recovery degree among the three major ecological zones,mainly reflected in the RH24,CC and PAI indicators.Among them,the recovery rate in the Changbai Mountain area was generally higher,while the restoration of the Great Khingan Mountains was more restricted in the low-level and canopy attribute indicators.This study demonstrates that GEDI LiDAR-derived structural parameters can effectively characterize long-term post-fire forest structural recovery at the regional scale,providing a scientific basis for post-fire for-est recovery assessment and forest management.

李思然;李明泽;王斌;马新泰

东北林业大学 森林生态系统可持续经营教育部重点实验室,哈尔滨 150040东北林业大学 森林生态系统可持续经营教育部重点实验室,哈尔滨 150040东北林业大学 森林生态系统可持续经营教育部重点实验室,哈尔滨 150040东北林业大学 森林生态系统可持续经营教育部重点实验室,哈尔滨 150040

农业科技

森林火灾结构恢复GEDI激光雷达火烈度恢复轨迹冠层垂直结构时空替代相对恢复率

Forest firestructural recoveryGEDI LiDARfire severityrecovery trajectorycanopy vertical structurespace-for-time substitutionrelative recovery rate

《森林工程》 2026 (3)

499-510,12

"十四五"国家重点研发计划课题项目(2023YFD2201704).

10.7525/j.issn.1006-8023.2026.03.006

评论