长江流域高温事件识别中两类阈值方法对比研究OA
Comparison of two threshold methods for identifying regional high-temperature events in Changjiang River Basin
全球气候变化背景下,极端高温事件频发加剧了长江流域水资源供需矛盾.为客观揭示长江流域高温事件时空分布特征及其演变趋势,利用流域735 个国家气象观测站1961~2022 年逐日最高气温资料,分别采用绝对阈值法和相对阈值法识别长江上游、中下游暖季区域性高温事件,并从发生频次、时空分布、综合强度等多个维度对比分析两类阈值方法的适用性与敏感性.结果表明:① 绝对阈值法在长江上游和中下游分别识别出299 次和383 次高温事件,相对阈值法在长江上游和中下游分别识别出 423 次和 410 次高温事件,相对阈值法对长江上游高温事件更敏感.② 绝对阈值法识别出的高温事件集中于7~8 月,相对阈值法识别出的高温事件在5~9 月分布较均匀,绝对阈值法对极端高温时段响应更灵敏.③ 绝对阈值法识别的高温事件持续时间在7.1~8.7 d 之间,相对阈值法识别的高温事件平均持续时间仅 5.4 d,绝对阈值法对高温过程持续时间识别更稳定.④ 两种方法识别出的典型高温年一致率为60%,均揭示出近60 年来区域性高温事件频次和强度呈显著上升趋势,21 世纪以来高温事件极端性显著增强.相对阈值法对气候变化响应更敏感,而绝对阈值法对高强度极端高温事件刻画更突出.研究成果可为长江流域高温事件研究和应对提供参考.
Against the backdrop of global climate change,the frequent occurrence of extreme high-temperature events has ex-acerbated the water resource supply-demand imbalance in the Changjiang River Basin.To objectively characterize the spatiotem-poral distribution and evolutionary trends of high-temperature events in the Changjiang River Basin,this study utilized daily max-imum temperature data from 735 national meteorological stations within the basin from 1961 to 2022.Regional high-temperature events during the warm season in the upper and middle-lower reaches of the Changjiang River were identified using both abso-lute and relative threshold approaches.A comparative analysis of the applicability and sensitivity of these two approaches was per-formed from multiple perspectives,including occurrence frequency,spatiotemporal distribution,and comprehensive intensity.The results indicate that:① The absolute threshold approach identified 299 and 383 high-temperature events in the upper and mid-dle-lower reaches of the Changjiang River,respectively,whereas the relative threshold approach identified 423 and 410 events.The relative threshold approach was more sensitive to high-temperature events in the upper reaches of the Changjiang River.②Events identified by the absolute threshold approach were concentrated in July and August,whereas those identified by the relative threshold approach were more evenly distributed from May to September.The absolute threshold approach was more responsive to periods of extreme high temperature.③ The duration of events identified by the absolute threshold approach ranged from 7.1 to 8.7 days,compared with an average of 5.4 days for events identified by the relative threshold approach.The absolute threshold approach enabled more stable identification of the duration of high-temperature events.④ The consistency rate of typical high-temperature years identified by the two approaches reaches 60%.Both approaches indicated that the frequency and intensity of re-gional high-temperature events have exhibited a significantly increasing trend over the past 60 years.The extremity of high-temperature events has increased notably since the 21st century.The relative threshold approach is more sensitive to climate change,whereas the absolute threshold approach is superior in characterizing high-intensity extreme high-temperature events.The research findings can provide a scientific reference for research and adaptive responses to high-temperature events in river basins.
胡一阳;秦鹏程;夏智宏;冯扬;牛自耕;方思达
咸宁市气象局,湖北 咸宁 437100湖北省气候中心,湖北 武汉 430074||长江流域气象中心,湖北 武汉 430074湖北省气候中心,湖北 武汉 430074||长江流域气象中心,湖北 武汉 430074湖北省气候中心,湖北 武汉 430074||长江流域气象中心,湖北 武汉 430074中国地质大学(武汉)地理与信息工程学院,湖北 武汉 430074湖北省气象局,湖北 武汉 430074||三峡国家气候观象台,湖北 宜昌 443000||中国气象局流域强降水重点开放实验室,湖北 武汉 430205
天文与地球科学
区域性高温事件相对阈值法绝对阈值法长江流域
regional high-temperature eventrelative threshold approachabsolute threshold approachChangjiang River Ba-sin
《人民长江》 2026 (5)
28-36,47,10
中国气象局创新发展专项项目(CXFZ2023J51)湖北省自然科学基金重点项目(2023AFD098)湖北省自然科学基金创新发展联合基金项目(2022CFD127)
评论