马克思主义出版观赋能中国出版学自主知识体系构建的路径研究OA

[Purpose/Significance]Against the backdrop of the ongoing modernization process in China,the development of an independent knowledge system for publishing studies has become a core task in the advancement of Chinese-style philosophy and social sciences.It is a practical requirement for cultural exports and international discourse power,as well as an inevitable part of improving disciplinary systems.However,the current construction process is constrained by insufficient theoretical foundations and inadequate supporting systems,which undermine disciplinary independence and global influence.Unlike existing studies that separate theory and practice,this study is guided by the Marxist view of publishing.It systematically analyzes the logical starting points,dilemmas,and pathways of creating an independent knowledge system for publishing studies.It clarifies the ideological nature,practical orientation,and people-centered principles of publishing studies,fills the research gap by integrating guiding theories with disciplinary construction,and provides a theoretical framework for the high-quality development of publishing studies and cultural power construction.[Method/Process]This study adopts normative theoretical analysis and a systematic review based on historical materialism and dialectical materialism.It reviews the historical evolution of publishing studies in China to clarify the historical logic of the development of the discipline.Through literature analysis and realistic problem induction,it identifies internal weaknesses(basic concepts,research paradigms,and discourse systems)and external deficiencies(institutional supply,faculty construction,and industry-education integration).Focusingg on the core connotations of the Marxist view of publishing,the study establishes a logical framework that connects guiding theories with practical pathways and proposes targeted strategies.[Results/Conclusions]The construction is supported by value,practice,and historical logic.Major dilemmas include insufficient original and iconic concepts,over-reliance on other disciplines in research paradigms,weak international discourse,inadequate institutional support,a shortage of dual-qualified teachers,and a disconnect between talent training and industry demands.Three pathways are proposed:strengthening institutional design and resource allocation,improving knowledge production and communication mechanisms,and optimizing talent training systems.This study promotes the theoretical systematization of publishing studies with Chinese characteristics and provides operational solutions for disciplinary development.Future research may strengthen empirical investigations and examine the integration of new technologies into publishing education.