首页|期刊导航|环境工程学报|退役风机叶片循环路径与碳效益重构研究

退役风机叶片循环路径与碳效益重构研究OA

Research on the Recycling Path and Carbon Benefits Reconstruction of Decommissioned Wind Turbine Blades

中文摘要英文摘要

在"双碳"战略目标引领下,中国风电装机规模持续快速增长,退役风电叶片的低碳循环利用问题日益突出.本研究旨在系统梳理退役风电叶片的材料回收路径、政策支撑体系及其生命周期碳效益.研究首先分析了我国风电装机的区域分布与机组特征,指出不同区域退役叶片在拆解、运输及再利用方面存在差异化挑战.随后对比了机械物理法、热解法、化学法及联合法等回收技术,结果表明:机械物理法成本低但纤维保留率不足(10%~78%),热解法已实现工业化,但碳排放强度较高,化学法纤维保留率较高(55%~96%),具备潜在的碳减排优势,联合法则可突破单一技术局限,纤维保留率超过 95%,展现了高值化和低碳化并行的潜力.政策层面,国家已提出 2025年初步建立叶片回收责任机制、2030年形成产业集聚区的"双阶段目标",并在标准规范和激励机制上逐步完善.生命周期评价显示,风电在全球变暖潜势(GWP)上略高于光伏,但其排放主要集中于组件制造环节;若实现高效回收,风电有望在全生命周期碳效益上超越光伏.综上,推进退役风电叶片的高效回收与政策协同,不仅能实现资源循环利用与碳减排的双重效益,还将为重构可再生能源可持续发展范式提供有力支撑

Driven by the"dual carbon"strategic goals,China's wind power installed capacity has been growing rapidly,bringing the challenge of low-carbon recycling and utilization of decommissioned wind turbine blades to the forefront.This study aimed to systematically review the material recycling pathways,policy support systems,and life cycle carbon benefits of decommissioned wind turbine blades.The study first analyzed the regional distribution and unit characteristics of China's wind power installations,pointing out that decommissioned blades in different regions face differentiated challenges in dismantling,transportation,and reuse.Subsequently,it compared various recycling technologies including mechanical physical methods,pyrolysis,chemical methods,and combined methods.The results indicated that mechanical physical methods were low-cost but yields insufficient fiber retention rates(10%~78%).While pyrolysis had been industrialized,it was associated with relatively high carbon emission intensity.In contrast,chemical methods had higher fiber retention rates(55%~96%)and possed potential carbon reduction advantages.Combined methods capable of overcoming the limitations of single technologies,achieved fiber retention rates exceeding 95%,demonstrating significant potential for both high value and low carbon.At the policy level,China has established a"two-stage goal"of initially establishing a blade recycling responsibility mechanism by 2025 and forming industrial clusters by 2030,alongside a gradual improvement of standards and incentive mechanisms.Life cycle assessment revealed that wind power had a slightly higher global warming potential(GWP)than photovoltaic power.However,its emissions were mainly concentrated in the component manufacturing stage.With efficient recycling,wind power wes expected to surpass photovoltaic power in life cycle carbon benefits.In conclusion,promoting efficient recycling of decommissioned blades and coordinated policy actions can yield dual benefits in resource recycling and carbon reduction,thereby bolstering the sustainable development paradigm for renewable energy.

蔡筹皑;李夏;吴春然;方乐;张成;寇世聪

北京师范大学环境学院,北京 100875||北京师范大学湿地环境保护与生态修复全国重点实验室,北京 100875||北京师范大学滨海水环境治理与水生态修复广东普通高校重点实验室,珠海 519087北京师范大学环境学院,北京 100875||北京师范大学湿地环境保护与生态修复全国重点实验室,北京 100875||北京师范大学滨海水环境治理与水生态修复广东普通高校重点实验室,珠海 519087广州大学土木与交通工程学院,广州 510006北京师范大学环境学院,北京 100875||北京师范大学湿地环境保护与生态修复全国重点实验室,北京 100875||北京师范大学滨海水环境治理与水生态修复广东普通高校重点实验室,珠海 519087北京师范大学珠海校区理工实验平台,珠海 519087广州大学土木与交通工程学院,广州 510006

资源环境

退役风电叶片低碳循环回收技术生命周期评价(LCA)

decommissioned wind turbine bladeslow-carbon cyclerecycling technologylife cycle assessment(LCA)

《环境工程学报》 2026 (5)

1370-1383,14

国家自然科学基金资助项目(42576155、52200142)

10.12030/j.cjee.202509039

评论