蛋白组学筛选胎儿生长受限羊水生物标志物的研究OA
Proteomic screening of amniotic fluid biomarkers for fetal growth restriction
目的:利用蛋白组学方法筛选生长受限胎儿羊水差异表达的蛋白,筛选潜在的可诊断胎儿生长受限的生物标志物.方法:对晚孕期的29例羊水样本进行蛋白组学分析和验证.(1)18例羊水样本(包括8例严重生长受限胎儿、5例小于胎龄胎儿及5例正常胎儿)通过基于质谱的4D-Label-free Quantification(4D-LFQ)定量蛋白质组学技术鉴定蛋白并进行定量,当P<0.05时,以差异表达量变化超过1.5作为明显上调的变化阈值,小于1/1.5作为明显下调的变化阈值,分别筛选严重生长受限胎儿对比正常胎儿、小于胎龄胎儿对比正常胎儿、严重生长受限胎儿对比小于胎龄胎儿的差异表达蛋白,对差异蛋白进行功能、通路富集分析及蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用网络.以正常胎儿、小于胎龄胎儿、严重生长受限胎儿的顺序,进行蛋白表达模式聚类分析,并对聚类蛋白进行功能、通路富集分析.(2)基于质谱的靶向蛋白质组定量技术(PRM)验证15例羊水(包括严重生长受限胎儿、小于胎龄胎儿、正常胎儿各5例,18例中3例样本量不足)的17种差异蛋白.(3)用酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)检测10例严重生长受限胎儿及10例正常胎儿羊水中铁死亡通路关键蛋白TFRC和GPX4浓度并比较差异(部分样本量不足以进行后续实验,新纳入11例研究病例,包括4例严重生长受限胎儿和7例正常胎儿).结 果:(1)通过特异性肽段解析的蛋白总数为3 047,可定量比较的蛋白数为2 957.将严重胎儿生长受限,小于胎龄胎儿2组病例组及正常对照组两两比较,严重胎儿生长受限组对比正常对照组鉴定到235个差异蛋白(包括137个上调蛋白和98个下调蛋白),小于胎龄胎儿组对比正常对照组鉴定到197个差异蛋白(包括111个上调蛋白和86个下调蛋白),严重胎儿生长受限组对比小于胎龄胎儿组鉴定到 140 个差异蛋白(68 个上调蛋白和 72 个下调蛋白).(2)基于质谱的靶向蛋白质组定量技术(parallel reaction monitoring,PRM)验证 17 种显著差异蛋白,其中 TPP1、PRL、CRP、EDN3、LAMA2、ERP29、PDIA3、IGFBPL1、CHRD、CTNNBIP1、ALPL、CTSL、ACE、CEL、AHSP共15个蛋白在病例组与对照组的比较中表达趋势与定量结果完全一致.(3)酶联免疫法检测10例严重生长受限胎儿及10例正常胎儿羊水的TFRC、GPX4浓度并比较差异,TFRC在严重生长受限胎儿组明显上调,GPX4在两组间差异无统计学意义.结论:对生长受限胎儿的羊水用基于质谱的4D-Label-free Quantification(4D-LFQ)定量蛋白质组学进行研究,严重生长受限胎儿组对比正常组共鉴定到差异蛋白235个(137个上调,98个下调),小于胎龄胎儿组对比正常胎儿共鉴定到197个差异蛋白(111个上调,86个下调).经基于质谱的靶向蛋白质组定量技术(PRM)验证显著差异蛋白,ELISA 验证铁死亡通路相关蛋白,蛋白 TPP1、PRL、CRP、EDN3、LAMA2、ERP29、PDIA3、IGFBPL1、CHRD、CTNNBIP1、ALPL、CTSL、ACE、CEL、AHSP、TFRC有望成为胎儿生长受限的生物标志物.
Objective:To screen differentially expressed proteins in the amniotic fluid of growth restricted fetuses and to screen biomarkers for the diagnosis of growth restricted fetuses by proteomics.Methods:Proteomic analysis and verification of amniotic fluid was performed in 29 cases of third trimester pregnancy.(1)Eighteen amniotic fluid samples(including 8 fetuses with severe growth restriction,5 fetuses small for gestational age and 5 normal fetuses)identified proteins and quantified them by mass spec-trometry based 4D-Label-free Quantification(4D-LFQ)quantitative proteomics technology.When P<0.05,the change of differ-ential expression level was more than 1.5 and less than 1/1.5 as the significantly up-regulated and down-regulated change thresh-old,respectively.The differentially expressed proteins of severe Fetal Growth Restriction compared to normal fetuses,Small for Gestational Age compared to normal pregnancy fetuses,and severe Fetal Growth Restriction compared to Small for Gestational Age were screened,respectively.Function,pathway enrichment analysis and protein-protein interaction network were performed for the differentially expressed proteins.In order of normal fetus,Small for Gestational Age and severe Fetal Growth Restriction,the protein expression pattern cluster analysis was performed,and the clustering protein function and pathway enrichment analysis was performed.(2)Mass spectrometry-based targeted proteomic quantification(PRM)was used to verify 17 differentially ex-pressed proteins in amniotic fluid of 15 cases(including 5 severe Fetal Growth Restriction,5 Small for Gestational Age fetuses and 5 normal fetuses each,because the sample sizes of the rest 3 cases were insufficient).(3)The concentrations of Ferroptosis pathway key proteins TFRC and GPX4 in amniotic fluid of 10 severe Fetal Growth Restriction and 10 normal fetuses were detect-ed by enzyme-linked immunoassay and the differences were compared(some sample sizes were insufficient for the subsequent ex-periments,11 new research cases were included,including 4 fetuses with severe growth restriction and 7 normal fetuses).Re-sults:(1)The total number of proteins analyzed by specific peptides was 3 047,and the number of proteins that could be quantita-tively compared was 2 957.Two cases groups of severe Fetal Growth Restriction and Small for Gestational Age were compared to the normal control group.235 differentially expressed proteins(including 137 up-regulated proteins and 98 down-regulated pro-teins)were identified in the severe Fetal Growth Restriction group compared with the normal control group.There were 197 differ-entially expressed proteins(including 111 up-regulated proteins and 86 down-regulated proteins)in the Small for Gestational Age group compared with the normal group,and 140 differentially expressed proteins(68 up-regulated proteins and 72 down-regulated proteins)in the severe Fetal Growth Restriction group compared to the Small for Gestational Age group.(2)Mass spectrometry-based targeted proteomic quantification(parallel reaction monitoring,PRM)to verify 17 significantly differentially expressed pro-teins.Among them,the expression trend of 15 proteins including TPP1,PRL,CRP,EDN3,LAMA2,ERP29,PDIA3,IGFB-PL1,CHRD,CTNNBIP1,ALPL,CTSL,ACE,CEL and AHSP were completely consistent with the quantitative results in the comparison between case group and control group.(3)The concentrations of TFRC and GPX4 in amniotic fluid of 10 severely growth restricted fetuses and 10 normal fetuses were detected by ELISA and compared.TFRC was significantly up-regulated in se-verely growth restricted fetuses,and there was no significant difference in GPX4 between the two groups.Conclusion:The amni-otic fluid of growth restricted fetuses was studied with mass spectrometry based 4D-Label-free Quantification(4D-LFQ)quantita-tive proteomics.Compared to the normal group,235 differentially expressed proteins(137 up-regulated and 98 down-regulated)and 197 differentially expressed proteins(111 up-regulated and 86 down-regulated)were identified in severe Fetal Growth Restric-tion group and Small for Gestational Age group,respectively.Verified by mass spectrometry-based targeted proteomic quantifica-tion(PRM)with the significantly differentially expressed proteins,and by ELISA with the proteins associated with the Ferropto-sis pathway,proteins TPP1,PRL,CRP,EDN3,LAMA2,ERP29,PDIA3,IGFBPL1,CHRD,CTNNBIP1,ALPL,CT-SL,ACE,CEL,AHSP,TFRC are expected to be biomarkers of Fetal Growth Restriction.
陈甦;刘春桃;陈月芬;王瑞霞;朱薪;吴彬扬;陈泽俊;凌奕;卫焱星;揭秋玲;许莹红;王婷;何桂林;王丽
海南医科大学第一附属医院妇产科胎儿医学科,生殖健康及相关疾病研究与转化教育部重点实验室,海南 海口 570102海南医科大学第一附属医院妇产科胎儿医学科,生殖健康及相关疾病研究与转化教育部重点实验室,海南 海口 570102海南医科大学第一附属医院妇产科胎儿医学科,生殖健康及相关疾病研究与转化教育部重点实验室,海南 海口 570102海南医科大学第一附属医院妇产科胎儿医学科,生殖健康及相关疾病研究与转化教育部重点实验室,海南 海口 570102海南医科大学第一附属医院妇产科胎儿医学科,生殖健康及相关疾病研究与转化教育部重点实验室,海南 海口 570102海南医科大学第一附属医院妇产科胎儿医学科,生殖健康及相关疾病研究与转化教育部重点实验室,海南 海口 570102海南医科大学第一附属医院感染科,海南 海口 570102海南医科大学第一附属医院妇产科胎儿医学科,生殖健康及相关疾病研究与转化教育部重点实验室,海南 海口 570102南方医科大学南方医院妇产科,广东 广州 510515||南方医科大学基础医学院广东省功能蛋白组学重点实验室,广东 广州 510515海南医科大学第一附属医院妇产科胎儿医学科,生殖健康及相关疾病研究与转化教育部重点实验室,海南 海口 570102海南医科大学第一附属医院妇产科胎儿医学科,生殖健康及相关疾病研究与转化教育部重点实验室,海南 海口 570102海南医科大学第一附属医院妇产科胎儿医学科,生殖健康及相关疾病研究与转化教育部重点实验室,海南 海口 570102海南医科大学第一附属医院妇产科胎儿医学科,生殖健康及相关疾病研究与转化教育部重点实验室,海南 海口 570102海南医科大学第一附属医院妇产科胎儿医学科,生殖健康及相关疾病研究与转化教育部重点实验室,海南 海口 570102
医药卫生
胎儿生长受限蛋白组学羊水生物标志物
Fetal Growth RestrictionProteomicsAmniotic fluidBiomarker
《海南医科大学学报》 2026 (10)
769-784,16
海南省自然科学基金(822RC825)国家自然科学基金(82471718)广东省自然科学基金(2024A1515012754)2023年大学生创新项目(X202311810081)This study was supported by the Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation(822RC825)National Natural Science Foundation of China(82471718)Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province(2024A1515012754)2023 College Student Innovation Project(X202311810081)
评论