首页|期刊导航|大气科学|CMA-REPS登陆台风路径预报误差特征及订正技术

CMA-REPS登陆台风路径预报误差特征及订正技术OA

Error Characteristics and Correction Techniques of CMA-REPS Landing Typhoon Path Forecasts

中文摘要英文摘要

以 2016年登陆中国大陆的"尼伯特"、"妮妲"、"莫兰蒂"和"鲇鱼"台风为例,利用中国气象局区域集合预报系统(China Meteorological Administration-Regional Ensemble Prediction System,CMA-REPS)集合预报产品,对台风路径、登陆时间和登陆地点进行集合预报检验.在此基础上,结合台风实时业务定位资料,提出了一种新的 0~12 h最小累积路径误差(0~12 h Minimum Cumulative Track Error Scheme,MCTES)集合预报台风路径实时优选方案,并与 12 h最小路径误差(12 h Minimum Track Error Scheme,MTES)集合预报台风路径实时优选方案进行对比分析,以期为更有效地业务应用 CMA-REPS台风路径集合预报产品提供依据.结果表明:(1)在登陆台风路径预报方面,总体而言,CMA-REPS的集合平均预报效果不及控制预报;(2)MCTES集合预报台风路径实时优选方案明显改进了 CMA-REPS的集合平均和控制预报的台风路径结果,其效果依次优于MTES方案、CMA-REPS的控制预报和集合平均.与控制预报相比,MCTES方案预报的台风登陆时间、登陆点和 24~72 h时效内每隔 12 h台风移动路径的平均绝对误差分别减少了 0.4 h、34.3 km和 21.1 km;与集合平均相比,上述误差则分别减少了 1.1 h、36.4 km和 31.7 km;(3)将 MCTES方案选出的最优成员与控制预报成员进行集成,台风路径预报误差进一步降低.与集合平均相比,控制预报台风路径平均距离误差减少了-5.21%~11.51%;MCTES方案将平均距离误差的减少幅度提升至 13.42%~19.83%;而 MCTES与控制预报的集成方案则进一步将平均距离误差的减少幅度提升为16.28%~20.83%.

Taking the landfall typhoons"Nepartak","Nida","Meranti",and"Megi"in mainland China in 2016 as examples,this study evaluates the ensemble forecasts of typhoon track,landfall time,and landfall location using products from the China Meteorological Administration-Regional Ensemble Prediction System(CMA-REPS).Based on this analysis,a new real-time optimal selection scheme for typhoon track ensemble forecasts,the 0-12 h Minimum Cumulative Track Error Scheme(MCTES),is proposed by integrating operational real-time typhoon positioning data.This scheme is compared to the 12 h Minimum Track Error Scheme(MTES)to provide a reference for more effective operational applications of CMA-REPS typhoon track ensemble forecasts.The results are summarized as follows:(1)Overall,for typhoon track forecasting of landfalling typhoons,the ensemble mean forecast of CMA-REPS is inferior to the control forecast.(2)The MCTES real-time optimal typhoon track ensemble forecast selection scheme significantly improves the typhoon track predictions of both the CMA-REPS ensemble mean and control forecasts,outperforming the MTES scheme,CMA-REPS control forecast,and ensemble mean in sequence.Compared with the control forecast,the MCTES scheme reduced the average absolute errors in typhoon landing time,landing point,and the 12-hourly track movement within the 24-72 h forecast validity time by 0.4 h,34.3 km,and 21.1 km,respectively.Compared with the ensemble mean,these errors were reduced by 1.1 h,36.4 km,and 31.7 km,respectively.(3)Integrating the optimal members selected by the MCTES scheme with the control forecast members further reduces the typhoon track forecast errors.Compared with the ensemble mean,the average distance error of the control forecast was reduced by-5.21%-11.51%;the MCTES scheme increased the reduction to 13.42%-19.83%;and the integrated scheme of MCTES and control forecast further increased the reduction to 16.28%-20.83%.

王叶红;赵玉春;叶龙彬;苏志重;荀爱萍

厦门市气象局/厦门市海峡气象开放重点实验室,厦门 361012厦门市气象局/厦门市海峡气象开放重点实验室,厦门 361012厦门市气象局/厦门市海峡气象开放重点实验室,厦门 361012厦门市气象局/厦门市海峡气象开放重点实验室,厦门 361012厦门市气象局/厦门市海峡气象开放重点实验室,厦门 361012

天文与地球科学

CMA-REPS区域集合预报台风路径预报订正技术

CMA-REPSRegional ensemble forecastTyphoon track forecastCorrection technique

《大气科学》 2026 (2)

320-340,21

公益性行业(气象)科研专项201506007,福建省气象局开放式气象科学研究基金项目2023KJ05,厦门市自然科学基金项目3502Z202573107 Nonprofit Industry(Meteorology)Research Subject(Grant 201506007),Open Research Programme of Fujian Meteorological Bureau(Grant 2023KJ05),Xiamen Natural Science Foundation(Grant 3502Z202573107)

10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2506.25027

评论