自主知识体系建构视域下中国人工智能国际学术话语权评价研究OACHSSCD
Evaluation of China's international academic discourse power in AI from the perspective of independent knowledge system construction:A case study of AI papers
建构中国自主知识体系是加快构建中国特色哲学社会科学的战略命题,这对提升我国理论创新与文化软实力具有深远意义.人工智能作为前沿生产力的代表,其技术突破与学术研究的自主创新,不仅为我国哲学社会科学的知识生产范式变革提供了方法论支撑,更是我国打破西方技术垄断、摆脱对国外学术路径过度依赖的关键着力点.因此,开展中国人工智能国际学术话语权评价研究,建立健全综合性、多元化、多层次的国际学术话语权评价体系,有助于推动建设中国哲学社会科学的学科体系、学术体系和话语体系,促进AI领域论文成果转化与应用和建构中国自主知识体系.首先,聚焦AI领域论文这一研究对象,从学术影响力、学术感知力、学术传播力和学术引领力四个维度出发,对中国人工智能国际学术话语权评价维度的具体内涵及构成要素进行了深入解析.其次,在解析评价维度的基础上,依据福柯话语权理论、费孝通文化自觉理论、布雷多克7W理论,深入探讨中国人工智能国际学术话语权的生成逻辑,并明晰其内在作用机制.再次,通过采集多元异构数据和集成多种方法优势,并采用CRITIC法和投影寻踪分类模型对中国人工智能国际学术话语权分别进行了学术影响力、学术感知力、学术传播力和学术引领力的单维度评价与综合评价.在综合评价中,对计算机科学、化学和环境科学三大学科分别进行评价.最后,采用卷积神经网络和相关性分析对中国人工智能国际学术话语权评价结果进行验证,充分证明了该评价体系能够有效测度中国人工智能领域在国际学术场域的话语权水平.文章旨在丰富和完善中国人工智能国际学术话语权评价理论与指标体系,促进自主知识体系建构,提升中国在人工智能领域的国际学术话语权.
Building an independent knowledge system in China is a strategic proposition for accelerating the development of philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics,which holds profound significance for enhancing China's theoretical innovation and cultural soft power.As a representative of cutting-edge productive forces,artificial intelligence(AI),through its technological breakthroughs and independent innovation in academic research,not only provides methodological support for transforming the knowledge production paradigm in China's philosophy and social sciences but also serves as a crucial focus for China to break Western technological monopolies and reduce excessive reliance on foreign academic pathways.Therefore,conducting research on the evaluation of China's international academic discourse power in AI and establishing a comprehensive,diversified,and multi-level evaluation system will contribute to advancing the development of China's philosophical and social sciences in terms of disciplinary,academic,and discursive systems.It will also facilitate the transformation and application of AI paper achievements and support the construction of China's independent knowledge system.First,this paper focuses on Chinese AI papers as the research object.It conducts an in-depth analysis of the specific connotations and constituent elements of the evaluation dimensions for China's international academic discourse power from four perspectives:academic influence,academic perception,academic communication,and academic leadership.Second,building on the dimensional analysis,the study draws on Foucault's theory of discourse power,Fei Xiaotong's theory of cultural self-awareness,and Braddock's 7W model to explore the generative logic of international academic discourse power and clarify its underlying mechanisms.Third,by collecting multi-source heterogeneous data and integrating the strengths of diverse methods,the study employs the CRITIC method and the projection pursuit classification model to conduct both single-dimensional and comprehensive evaluations of the academic influence,perception,communication,and leadership of China's AI discourse power.In the comprehensive evaluation,assessment is carried out separately for three major disciplines:computer science,chemistry,and environmental science.Finally,convolutional neural networks and correlation analysis are used to validate the evaluation results,robustly demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed system in measuring China's discourse power in AI in the international academic arena.This study aims to enrich and refine the theory and indicator system for evaluating China's international academic discourse power in AI,thereby contributing to the construction of an independent knowledge system and enhancing China's voice in global AI academic discourse.
王旭;谢方;刘鹏瑞
燕山大学 经济管理学院,河北 秦皇岛 066004||武汉大学 中国科学评价研究中心,湖北 武汉 430072燕山大学 经济管理学院,河北 秦皇岛 066004江苏师范大学 科技情报研究所,江苏 徐州 221000
信息技术与安全科学
自主知识体系AI领域论文国际学术话语权评价学术影响力学术感知力学术传播力学术引领力
independent knowledge systemAI papersevaluation of international academic discourse poweracademic influenceacademic perceptionacademic communicationacademic leadership
《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》 2026 (2)
153-171,19
国家社会科学基金青年项目"面向自主知识体系建构的中国社会科学国际学术话语权评价与提升研究"(24CTQ051)
评论