CO_(2) solubility and mineral trapping behavior in high-salinity reservoirsOA
CO_(2) solubility and mineral trapping behavior are critical to the stability and effectiveness of integrating CO_(2) geological storage synergistically with gas field produced water(GPW)reinjection,a promising strategy for achieving co-benefits in pollution mitigation and carbon emission reduction.To investigate CO_(2) solubility-mineral trapping during co-injection with GPW-characterized by high salinity and complex ion composition-a series of CO_(2)-GPW-rock interaction experiments and geochemical simulations were conducted using sandstone and limestone samples,together with simulated GPW of salinities ranging from 47.6 to 225.5 g/L.The results indicate that:(1)CO_(2) solubilitymineral trapping behavior is governed primarily by CO_(2) pressure,injection method,and GPW salinity,and is further influenced by calcium concentration and rock mineralogy.Under the experimental conditions,the CO_(2) solubility-mineral trapping capacity ranged from 9.03 to 11.01 g/L,with corresponding trapping proportions between 74.56% and 87.38%;(2)within a closed CO_(2)-GPW-rock reactive system,the timedependent CO_(2) solubility-mineral trapping proportion can be described by the cumulative Weibull model.The CO_(2) solubility-mineral trapping capacity increases with increasing CO_(2) pressure but decreases with increasing GPW salinity.A slight elevation in calcium concentration enhances CO_(2) solubility-mineral trapping at low CO_(2) pressures,despite concurrent increases in ionic strength and brine salinity.When the GPW salinity remains constant,the variation in calcium concentration exerts only a limited influence on CO_(2) solubility-mineral trapping;(3)a higher reactive mineral content in the reservoir enhances CO_(2) solubility-mineral trapping,and intermittent injection significantly improves this process;(4)the cumulative solubility-mineral trapping capacity can reach 22.13-38.01 g/L,representing 2.28-3.04 times the capacity achieved under single-injection conditions.These findings underscore the importance of carefully selecting storage sites and designing injection schemes in CO_(2) geological storage operations.
Shugang Yang;Linlin Zhang;Shuangxing Liu;Mingyu Cai;Ming Xue;Xingchun Li;Kunfeng Zhang
CNPC Research Institute of Safety and Environment Technology Co.,Ltd,Beijing,102206,China State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Pollution Control,Beijing,102206,ChinaCNPC Research Institute of Safety and Environment Technology Co.,Ltd,Beijing,102206,China State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Pollution Control,Beijing,102206,ChinaCNPC Research Institute of Safety and Environment Technology Co.,Ltd,Beijing,102206,China State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Pollution Control,Beijing,102206,ChinaCNPC Research Institute of Safety and Environment Technology Co.,Ltd,Beijing,102206,China State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Pollution Control,Beijing,102206,ChinaCNPC Research Institute of Safety and Environment Technology Co.,Ltd,Beijing,102206,China State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Pollution Control,Beijing,102206,ChinaCNPC Research Institute of Safety and Environment Technology Co.,Ltd,Beijing,102206,China State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Pollution Control,Beijing,102206,ChinaCNPC Research Institute of Safety and Environment Technology Co.,Ltd,Beijing,102206,China State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Pollution Control,Beijing,102206,China
能源科技
CCUSCO_(2)utilizationCO_(2)-brine-rock interactionSolubility-mineral trappingGas field produced waterGeochemical modeling
《Natural Gas Industry B》 2026 (2)
P.147-163,17
the Scientific Research and Technology Development Project of CNPC,China(Grant Nos.2023ZZ1301,2021DJ6602 and 2021DQ03-A2).
评论