从历史分析到理论建构:自然哲学的美学旨趣OACHSSCD
From Historical Analysis to Theoretical Construction:The Aesthetic Orientation of Natural Philosophy Centered on the"Controversy over Spinozism"
雅可比与门德尔松关于"谁是真正的斯宾诺莎主义者"发生争论,这场争论的核心议题是如何理解自然.重构"斯宾诺莎主义之争"的思想史语境,可揭示自然哲学从"物理自然"客观逻辑到"心理自然"审美理解的理论跃迁,构建二者双重奠基框架.该框架中,"物理自然"将自然理解为自然、环境与生物的关系呈现渐进发展的自然阶次性,且指向客观物质世界的合逻辑性并将自然塑造为有机整体;"心理自然"将对自然的理解转化为审美视角,构成主体对自然的"审美理解",并指出自然的"残缺性"恰是自然之美.这种以审美视角观照自然的进路,构成了自然美学的核心论域.审美、自然哲学及现象学视野的多重交互,为当代生态美学重构人与自然的审美关联提供了兼具客观性与主观性的理论范式.
The debate between Jacobi and Mendelssohn over"who is the true Spinozist"centered on the question of how to interpret nature.By reconstructing the intellectual-historical context of the Spinozism Controversy,this study reveals a theoretical transition from the objective logic of"physical nature"to the aesthetic understanding of"psychological nature",thereby constructing a dual foundational framework in which the two dimensions mutually ground one another.Within this framework,"physical nature"interprets nature as a progressive,hierarchical order of relationships among nature,environment,and organisms,pointing to the logical coherence of the objective material world and shaping nature into an organic whole.Meanwhile,"psychological nature"transforms the understanding of nature into an aesthetic perspective,forming the subject's"aesthetic comprehension"of nature and asserting that nature's very"imperfection"constitutes its beauty.This approach,which views nature through an aesthetic lens,defines the core domain of natural aesthetics.The interplay among aesthetics,natural philosophy,and phenomenological perspectives provide a theoretical paradigm for contemporary ecological aesthetics to reconstruct the aesthetic relationship between humanity and nature—one that integrates both objectivity and subjectivity.
魏一帆
华南师范大学 科学技术与社会研究院,广东 广州 510006
社会科学
斯宾诺莎主义泛神论之争自然阶次性自然美学"物理自然""心理自然"
SpinozismPantheism Controversynatural hierarchynatural aesthetics"physical nature""psychological nature"
《湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2026 (3)
47-54,8
评论