基于FY-3D反演土壤湿度的机器学习模型对比OA
Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Soil Moisture Inversion Based on FY-3D
准确监测土壤湿度对东北持续旱情评估至关重要.针对机器学习模型在不同下垫面干旱监测的适用性和局限性,该文基于FY-3D遥感与土壤湿度实测数据,考虑下垫面、土壤深度及作物生长发育期影响,筛选干旱指数,选择RBF、XGB、LightGBM、RF四种算法构建土壤湿度反演模型并对比分析.结果表明:①RF模型稳定性和准确性显著优于其他模型,R2在0.64~0.81,高于LGBM、XGB、RBF模型0.14~0.35不等.②模型性能随土壤深度变化,0~20 cm最佳,平均RMSE 9.52%,优于10 cm(10.19%)和20 cm(9.79%),平均精度88.03%,较10 cm提升1.95%.③在森林、农田和草地不同下垫面,模型精度的生育期规律具有高度一致性,冻土和裸土期精度较高(>88.70%),其中森林冻土期最高,为94.30%,播种和成熟期稍低80.90%~84.10%,拔节期最低,草地区仅79.70%.
Accurate monitoring of soil moisture is essential for assessing persistent drought conditions in Northeast China.To investigate the applicability and limitations of machine learning models for drought monitor-ing under different underlying surface conditions,FY-3D remote sensing data are integrated in this study with in situ soil moisture observations.Factors such as land cover type,soil depth,and crop growth stages are consid-ered to select relevant drought indices.Four machine learning algorithms,Radial Basis Function(RBF),eX-treme Gradient Boosting(XGB),Light Gradient Boosting Machine(LightGBM),and Random Forest(RF)are employed to construct and comparatively analyze soil moisture retrieval models.The results indicate that:①the RF model demonstrates significantly superior stability and accuracy compared to the other models,with an R² ranging from 0.64 to 0.81,exceeding those of LightGBM,XGB,and RBF by 0.14-0.35;②model perfor-mance varies with soil depth,with the 0-20 cm layer achieving the best performance(average RMSE of 9.52%),outperforming the 10 cm(10.19%)and 20 cm(9.79%)layers,and achieving an average accuracy of 88.03%,which is 1.95%higher than that at 10 cm;③across different land cover types(forest,cropland,and grassland),the variation pattern of model accuracy over crop growth stages is highly consistent.Higher accura-cy is observed during frozen soil and bare soil periods(>88.70%),with the highest value occurring in forest areas during the frozen soil period(94.30%).Accuracy is slightly lower during sowing and maturity stages(80.90%-84.10%),and lowest during the jointing stage,particularly in grassland areas(79.70%).
王岩;华乐乐;冯锐;王宏博;武晋雯;金楚恒
沈阳建筑大学 交通与测绘工程学院,辽宁 沈阳 110168||中国气象局 沈阳大气环境研究所,辽宁 沈阳 110166沈阳建筑大学 交通与测绘工程学院,辽宁 沈阳 110168||中国气象局 沈阳大气环境研究所,辽宁 沈阳 110166中国气象局 沈阳大气环境研究所,辽宁 沈阳 110166||中国气象科学院 沈阳农业与生态气象研究院,辽宁 沈阳 110166||辽宁省农业气象灾害重点实验室,辽宁 沈阳 110166中国气象局 沈阳大气环境研究所,辽宁 沈阳 110166||中国气象科学院 沈阳农业与生态气象研究院,辽宁 沈阳 110166||辽宁省农业气象灾害重点实验室,辽宁 沈阳 110166中国气象局 沈阳大气环境研究所,辽宁 沈阳 110166||中国气象科学院 沈阳农业与生态气象研究院,辽宁 沈阳 110166||辽宁省农业气象灾害重点实验室,辽宁 沈阳 110166沈阳建筑大学 交通与测绘工程学院,辽宁 沈阳 110168||中国气象局 沈阳大气环境研究所,辽宁 沈阳 110166
天文与地球科学
东北地区干旱监测土壤相对湿度生长发育期下垫面机器学习FY-3D遥感数据
Northeast Chinadrought monitoringrelative soil moisturegrowth and development stageun-derlying surfacemachine learningFY-3D remote sensing data
《灾害学》 2026 (3)
66-76,11
气象能力提升联合研究项目(23NLTSZ006)中国气象局农业气象重点创新团队(CMA2024ZD02)辽宁省农业气象灾害重点实验室联合开放基金(2024SYIAEKFZD08)气象能力提升联合研究项目(23NLTSQ012)辽宁省社会科学规划基金(L19CSH001)
评论