首页|期刊导航|灾害学|灾害链视域下网络群体极化舆论危机形成机理研究

灾害链视域下网络群体极化舆论危机形成机理研究OA

Formation Mechanism of Public Opinion Crises Caused by Online Group Polarization under the Perspective of Disaster Chains

中文摘要英文摘要

网络群体极化正以风险叠加、链式爆发的态势冲击舆论安全.基于灾害链理论,从灾害体、受灾体、抗灾体、灾害环境四维度提炼影响网络群体极化舆论危机形成的七个前因条件,并立足组态视角,基于2022年5月—2025年3月30起热点事件,运用模糊集定性比较分析法探究因素间的多重并发因果关系,揭示网络群体极化舆论危机多元组态触发路径.研究表明,单个因素难以独立构成网络群体极化舆论危机形成的必要条件,四维度七因素存在复杂的多重并发因果关系,并以"敏感话题—视频催化"型、"盲目报道—社会关注"型、"高敏互动—权威缺位"型和"失真扩散—社会关注"型4类典型组态路径共同驱动网络群体极化舆论危机的形成.

Amid the wave of digital intelligence,the immediacy and fragmentation of information dissemina-tion are continuously eroding consensus in cyberspace.Online group polarization,characterized by risk accumu-lation and chain-reaction outbreaks,is increasingly threatening the security of the public opinion ecosystem.A thorough analysis of the factors that trigger online group polarization and the exploration of the multiple forma-tion paths of public opinion crises,followed by targeted public opinion guidance,is an important issue that urgent-ly needs to be addressed.Based on the disaster chain theory,seven antecedent conditions influencing the forma-tion of public opinion crises caused by online group polarization are identified across four dimensions:disaster agent,disaster affected body,disaster-resistant body,and disaster environment.Then from a configurational per-spective,fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis(fsQCA)is employed to explore the multiple concurrent causal relationships among these factors based on 30 hot events from May 2022 to March 2025.The findings re-veal diverse configurational pathways that trigger public opinion crises caused by online group polarization.The results indicate that no single factor could alone constitute the necessary condition for the formation of public opinion crises caused by online group polarization.On the contrary,the seven factors from four dimensions ex-hibit complex multiple concurrent causal relationships.Besides,these factors drive the formation of public opin-ion crises through four typical configurational pathways,namely the"sensitive topic-video catalyst"path,"blind reporting-social attention"path,"high sensitivity and interaction-authority absence"path,and"misinformation diffusion-social attention"path.Specifically,the"sensitive topic-video catalyst"path highlights the emotional am-plification effect of communication formats;the"blind reporting-social attention"path reveals the cognitive shap-ing function of media reporting frameworks;the"high sensitivity and interaction-authority absence"path confirms the pattern of opinion polarization under official silence;and the"misinformation diffusion-social attention"path exposes the destructive nature of false information in a high public attention environment.The findings suggest that relevant stakeholders and mainstream media should attach sufficient importance to socially sensitive topics,ensuring that public opinion monitoring and guidance are timely,measured and effective,thereby fostering a healthy public opinion ecosystem.

苏妍嫄;陈新元;程思敏;张亚明

燕山大学 经济管理学院,河北 秦皇岛 066004||燕山大学 互联网+与产业发展研究中心,河北 秦皇岛 066004燕山大学 经济管理学院,河北 秦皇岛 066004燕山大学 经济管理学院,河北 秦皇岛 066004燕山大学 经济管理学院,河北 秦皇岛 066004||燕山大学 互联网+与产业发展研究中心,河北 秦皇岛 066004

资源环境

网络群体极化灾害链理论舆论危机模糊集定性比较分析触发路径

online group polarizationdisaster chain theorypublic opinion crisisfuzzy-set Qualitative Com-parative Analysistrigger path

《灾害学》 2026 (3)

59-65,7

河北省社科基金"多路触发的社交媒体突发公共事件舆情非常规传播机制与应对策略研究"(HB24TQ001)

10.3969/j.issn.1000-811X.2026.03.007

评论