首页|期刊导航|中国癌症防治杂志|复发/难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤CAR-T治疗失败后的挽救策略探索

复发/难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤CAR-T治疗失败后的挽救策略探索OA

Salvage strategies after CAR-T therapy failure in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 分析嵌合抗原受体T细胞(chimeric antigen receptor T cell,CAR-T)治疗失败后不同挽救方案的疗效并探索影响预后的因素,以期为临床决策提供参考.方法 回顾性分析2022年4月至2024年12月在首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院经CAR-T治疗发生进展/复发后接受挽救治疗的29例复发/难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤(relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma,R/R LBCL)患者的疗效.将挽救治疗方案定义为6种:双特异性抗体方案、二次CAR-T输注方案、放射治疗方案、以维泊妥珠单抗为基础(Pola-based)的方案、免疫检查点抑制剂方案以及其他靶向/化疗药物方案.主要终点为总生存期(overall survival,OS;CAR-T回输后首次进展/复发到死亡或最后随访的时间),次要终点包括不同挽救方案的客观缓解率(objective response rate,ORR)、完全缓解(complete response,CR)、部分缓解(partial response,PR)及缓解持续时间(duration of re-sponse,DOR)等.采用单因素Cox回归分析探索影响患者OS的独立风险因素.结果 中位随访7.0个月后,29例接受挽救治疗患者的中位OS为7.0个月(范围:1.0~15.0个月).共计58例次挽救治疗事件的总体ORR为41.4%(24/58),CR率为12.1%(7/58).Pola-based方案的ORR最高(66.7%);二次CAR-T输注方案的CR率最高(30.0%),其中更换靶点CAR-T的CR率为60.0%.挽救治疗最常见的不良事件为发热.单因素分析结果显示晚期复发患者的OS优于早期复发患者(HR=0.44,95%CI:0.21~0.95,P=0.038).结论 CAR-T失败后的预后较差,其中晚期复发者的OS更优.在CAR-T失败后,采用更换靶点的二次CAR-T挽救方案可能获得更高的CR率;Pola-based挽救方案的ORR较高,但持久的临床获益仍然面临挑战.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of different salvage regimens after chimeric antigen receptor T cell(CAR-T)therapy failure and explore relevant prognostic factors,so as to provide reference for clinical decision-making.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted of 29 patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma(R/R LBCL)who received salvage treatment after progression/recurrence following CAR-T therapy at Beijing Tongren Hospital from April 2022 to December 2024.Salvage regimens were categorized into 6 groups:bispecific antibodies-based regimens,secondary CAR T-cell infusion,radiotherapy,Polatuzumab vedotin-based(Pola-based)regimens,immune checkpoint inhibitors,and other targeted/chemotherapy drugs.The primary endpoint was overall survival(OS),defined as the time from the first CAR-T reinfusion to death from any cause or the last follow-up.Secondary endpoints included:objective response rate(ORR),complete response(CR),partial response(PR),duration of response(DOR)for different salvage regimens.Univariable Cox re-gression analysis was performed to explore independent risk factors affecting OS after CAR-T therapy failure.Results After a median follow-up of 7.0 months,the median OS of the 29 enrolled patients rate was 7.0 months(range:1.0-15.0 months).Among the total 58 salvage treatment events,the overall ORR was 41.4%(24/58),and the CR rate was 12.1%(7/58).The Polatuzumab vedotin-based therapy demon-strated the highest ORR(66.7%);and the secondary CAR-T regimen demonstrated the highest CR rate(30.0%),with a CR rate of 60.0%for target-switching CAR-T.Fever was the most common adverse event of salvage therapy.Univariable analysis revealed that patients with late relapse had better OS than those with early relapse(HR=0.44;95%CI:0.21-0.95;P=0.038).Conclusions The prognosis after CAR-T therapy failure is poor,and patients with late relapse have better OS.After CAR-T failure,switching to a different CAR-T target for salvage therapy may yield higher CR rates.The pola-based regimen shows a high ORR,but achieving durable clinical benefit remains a challenge.

田晟宇;卢伟祥;王赫男;李福莉;刘辛迪;丛佳;王亮

100176 北京 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院血液科100176 北京 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院血液科100176 北京 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院血液科100176 北京 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院血液科100176 北京 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院血液科100176 北京 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院血液科100176 北京 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院血液科

医药卫生

弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤嵌合抗原受体T细胞治疗失败挽救治疗预后因素

Diffuse large B-cell lymphomaChimeric antigen receptor T cellTreatment failuresSalvage treatmentPrognostic factors

《中国癌症防治杂志》 2026 (2)

148-155,8

四大慢病重大专项(2025ZD0544300)

10.3969/j.issn.1674-5671.2026.02.03

评论