免除伦理审查制度的中美比较OA
A comparative study of the ethical review exemption system between China and the United States
免除伦理审查制度的提出是为了满足现代化的伦理管理需要,对涉及人的伦理审查项目进行分层管理,探索针对不大于最小风险、特定类型的研究,减少过程监管的伦理管理模式.通过比较研究,拟从伦理法规、风险界定、前置条件、适用情境、操作流程等对中美两国在免除伦理审查制度的差异进行阐述,为伦理审查委员会更好地实施免除伦理审查制度,增强政策研究、保证伦理审查的公平和客观提供借鉴.通过对中美两国免除伦理审查制度进行比较研究,对机构实施免除伦理审查制度提出以下建议:首先,制度应明确免除伦理审查的含义,以免研究者甚至委员对此产生误解,将其视为不属于伦理审查范围,使研究参与者的权益置于不必要的风险中.其次,制度应具体解释前置条件,包括研究类型和研究风险的要求.其中,风险要从生理、心理、社会和经济等多个方面考虑;对涉及商业利益和敏感个人信息要给出较为明确的说明.最后,制度应制定适用情形的基本原则和判断标准:说明公开数据具体所指,以及需要满足怎样的法律要求;提供匿名化概念,区别于去标识的信息数据;说明要遵循的相关法规和伦理原则、知情同意的明确要求.
The ethical review exemption system was introduced to meet the needs of modernized ethical governance,implement hierarchical management for ethical review projects involving human subjects,and explore an ethical management model that reduces procedural supervision for specific types of research involving no greater than minimal risk.Through a comparative study,this paper seeks to elaborate on the differences between China and the United States(US)in the ethical review exemption system from multiple aspects,such as ethical regulations,risk definition,preconditions,applicable scenarios,and operational procedures.The aim is to provide references for ethical review committees to better implement the ethical review exemption system,enhance policy research,and ensure the fairness and objectivity of ethical review.Through the comparative study of the ethics review exemption system in China and the US,the following recommendations are proposed for institutions implementing the ethical review exemption system for reference.First,the system should clearly define the meaning of ethical review exemption to prevent researchers or even committee members from misunderstanding it as falling outside the scope of ethical review,thereby exposing research participants'rights and interests to unnecessary risks.Second,the system should specifically explain the preconditions,including the requirements for research types and research risks.Among them,risks should be considered from multiple dimensions such as physiology,psychology,society,and economy.Clear explanations should be provided for involving commercial interests and sensitive personal information.Finally,the system should establish basic principles and judgment criteria for applicable scenarios,including specifying exactly what the public data refers to and legal requirements that need to be met,providing a concept of anonymization to distinguish it from deidentified information data,and clarifying the relevant regulations and ethical principles to be followed,as well as the clear requirements for informed consent.
赵励彦;张玉梅;刘瑞爽
北京大学生物医学伦理委员会办公室,北京 100191北京大学公共卫生学院,北京 100191北京大学医学人文学院,北京 100191
医药卫生
免除伦理审查风险知情同意比较研究
ethical review exemptionriskinformed consentcomparative study
《中国医学伦理学》 2026 (5)
616-623,8
评论