首页|期刊导航|中国油料作物学报|两个主栽油茶品种对干旱胁迫的适应策略

两个主栽油茶品种对干旱胁迫的适应策略OA

Adaptation strategies of two main Camellia oleifera varieties to drought stress

中文摘要英文摘要

研究两个主栽油茶品种对干旱胁迫的响应机制及其适应策略,可为解析油茶抗旱机理、良种高效栽培管理提供重要的理论依据和技术支撑.以湘林210和长林53的3年生苗为研究对象,设置轻度(田间持水量40%~50%)、中度(田间持水量30%~40%)和重度(田间持水量20%~30%)干旱胁迫处理,开展为期90天的盆栽控水试验,系统测定了碳分配模式、叶片构建成本相关指标、气体交换特性及水分关系动态变化,分析两个主栽油茶品种对干旱胁迫响应差异及其适应策略.干旱胁迫下两个主栽油茶品种表现出差异化的适应策略.在轻度干旱条件下,湘林210和长林53均能维持基本生长.但在中度和重度干旱胁迫下,二者表现出不同的响应策略.湘林210在中、重度干旱下株高下降30.80%~47.40%;地径最大降幅达82.22%(30d),同时显著提升根冠比(40.00%~44.30%)和比叶面积(36.14%~73.80%).而长林53株高降幅达29.78%~63.06%,地径最大下降66.77%,并表现出动态的比叶面积调节(先降后升)、干物质含量增加(最高31.90%)以及快速气孔导度下调(干旱15d下降34.69%~36.45%,干旱60d下降61.23%~64.10%).主成分分析方法显示长林53在干旱环境中表现出更强的稳定性和适应性.本研究揭示了两个主栽油茶品种的差异化抗旱策略.湘林210通过"动态响应"策略适应季节性干旱,表现为快速调整生物量分配(根冠比显著提升)、可塑性叶片形态调整及渐进式气孔调控;而长林53则采取"稳态维持型"策略应对持续性干旱,表现为固有抗旱性状、保守的叶片形态.

To better understand the response mechanisms and adaptation strategies of two main Camellia oleif-era varieties to drought stress,providing important theoretical basis and technical support for the management mea-sures for efficient cultivation of high-quality varieties of C.oleifera,three-year-old seedlings of C.oleifera varieties Xianglin 210 and Changlin 53 were selected for investigating adaptive strategies under drought stress.A controlled pot experiment lasting 90 days was conducted with three moisture treatment levels,including mild(40%-50%of the field water holding capacity),moderate(field water holding capacity 30%-40%),and severe(field water holding capacity 20%-30%)drought stress.Quantitative assessments were conducted on carbon allocation patterns,leaf construction costs,gas exchange parameters,and dynamic water relations.Comparative analyses were performed to elucidate the differential responses of contrasting C.oleifera varieties to gradient drought stress,with particular em-phasis on characterizing their adaptive strategies and underlying physiological mechanisms.Under drought stress,2 C.oleifera varieties exhibited differentiated adaptation strategies.Under mild drought conditions,both Xianglin 210 and Changlin 53 can maintain basic growth.However,under the stress of moderate and severe drought,2 varieties showed different response strategies.Under moderate and severe drought stress,Xianglin 210 exhibited a 30.80%-47.40%reduction in plant height,with the most pronounced decrease in ground diameter reaching 82.22%after 30 days of treatment.In contrast,this genotype demonstrated adaptive morphological adjustments,showing signifi-cant increases in root-to-shoot ratio(40.00%-44.30%)and specific leaf area(36.14%-73.80%),which may con-tribute to its drought tolerance mechanism.Under prolonged drought stress,Changlin 53 plants cultivated exhibited significant morphological adjustments,with plant height reduction ranging from 29.78%to 63.06%and maximum basal diameter decrease reaching 66.77%.Notably,this genotype demonstrated dynamic regulation of specific leaf area(SLA)characterized by an initial decline followed by compensatory increase,accompanied by enhanced dry matter accumulation(elevated by up to 31.90%).Physiological responses included rapid stomatal conductance re-duction(34.69%-36.45%decrease within 15 days)and sustained water conservation mechanisms,with cumulative height reduction stabilizing at 61.23%-64.10%after 60 days.Principal component analysis revealed that Changlin 53,in contrast to Xianglin 210,maintains superior homeostasis and phenotypic plasticity under drought stress through coordinated regulation of morphological remodeling and physiological adjustments,suggesting its putative adaptive strategies for improving drought resilience in oil tea plantations.This study elucidated the divergent drought resistance strategies employed by 2 major C.oleifera cultivars.Xianglin 210 demonstrated a"dynamic accli-mation"strategy for coping with episodic drought,characterized by rapid biomass redistribution,plastic leaf mor-phology adjustment,and progressive stomatal conductance modulation.In contrast,Changlin 53 adopted a"homeo-static maintenance"strategy to address prolonged drought,exhibiting intrinsic drought-resistant traits,conservative leaf morphology,and threshold-triggered stomatal closure.This cultivar-specific strategy classification system pro-vides novel insights into the mechanistic basis of drought resilience in C.oleifera,offering theoretical guidance for differentiated breeding programs and regionalized planting schemes.

彭溢濠;唐徐一;邹婷婷;张浩林;胥雅乐;吴婷;胡冬南;刘娟

江西农业大学林学院/亚热带森林资源培育江西省重点实验室,江西南昌,330045江西农业大学林学院/亚热带森林资源培育江西省重点实验室,江西南昌,330045江西农业大学林学院/亚热带森林资源培育江西省重点实验室,江西南昌,330045江西农业大学林学院/亚热带森林资源培育江西省重点实验室,江西南昌,330045江西农业大学林学院/亚热带森林资源培育江西省重点实验室,江西南昌,330045江西农业大学林学院/亚热带森林资源培育江西省重点实验室,江西南昌,330045江西农业大学林学院/亚热带森林资源培育江西省重点实验室,江西南昌,330045江西农业大学林学院/亚热带森林资源培育江西省重点实验室,江西南昌,330045

农业科技

品种抗旱差异干旱胁迫灵活适应型稳态维持型持续性干旱季节性干旱

drought resistance difference of varietiesdrought stressflexible and adaptablesteady-state maintenance typepersistent droughtseasonal drought

《中国油料作物学报》 2026 (2)

206-219,14

江西省林业局油茶研究专项(YCYJZX[2023]141),江西省赣鄱俊才主要学科学术和技术带头人培养项目(20243BCE51086)江西省自然科学基金面上项目(20232BAB205054)江西省重点研发计划"揭榜挂帅"项目(20223BBF61012)

10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2025120

评论