中文版心境障碍问卷青少年版的效度和信度评价OACHSSCD
Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of Mood Disorders Questionnaire for Adolescents
目的:检验中文版心境障碍问卷青少年版(C-MDQ-A)效度和信度,探究其区分青少年双相障碍与抑郁障碍最佳界值.方法:将 MDQ-A 修订为 C-MDQ-A,含自我报告版和父母报告版.2023 年 9月-2024 年2 月,北京大学第六医院儿童科 130 名患者及其家属参与研究,其中双相障碍60 对,抑郁障碍70 对.约3 个月后从双相障碍组抽取30 对重测.对量表做探究性因子分析,用组内相关系数评估重测信度,用 Cronbach α系数评估内部一致性系数,用 ROC 曲线分析筛查性能,用 Yuden 指数探最佳界值.结果:C-MDQ-A 两版本均为5 因子结构,累积方差解释率 64.1%和 64.8%.重测信度 0.90 和 0.96,Cron-bach α系数0.70 和0.71.ROC 曲线下面积0.90 和0.86,最佳界值自我报告版5 分(灵敏度0.70,特异度0.90),父母报告版4 分(灵敏度0.80,特异度0.79).结论:C-MDQ-A 两版本在双相障碍青少年中效度、信度良好.
Objective:To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Mood Disorders Questionnaire for Adolescents(C-MDQ-A)and to explore the optimal cutoff point for distinguishing adolescent bi-polar disorder from depressive disorder.Methods:The MDQ-A was adapted into the C-MDQ-A,comprising self-re-port and parent-report versions.From September 2023 to February 2024,130 patients and their families from the pe-diatric department of Peking University Sixth Hospital participated in the study,including 60 groups with bipolar disorder and 70 groups with depressive disorder.After approximately 3 months,30 groups from the bipolar disorder group were selected for retest.Exploratory factor analysis was performed on the scale.The test-retest reliability was evaluated using interclass correlation coefficient,and the internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach αcoef-ficient.The screening performance was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve,and the optimal cutoff point was explored using the Youden index.Results:The results showed that both versions of the C-MDQ-A had a 5-factor structure,with cumulative variance explained rates of 64.1%and 64.8%,respectively.The test-retest reliabilities were 0.90 and 0.96,and the internal consistency values were 0.70 and 0.71,respective-ly.The areas under the ROC curve were 0.90 and 0.86,and the optimal cutoff points were 5 points for the self-re-port version(sensitivity 0.70,specificity 0.90)and 4 points for the parent-report version(sensitivity 0.80,specific-ity 0.79).Conclusion:Both self-report and parent-report versions of the C-MDQ-A demonstrates good validity and reliability,supporting their use in the clinical screening of adolescent bipolar disorder.
王以沛;张康福茜;曹庆久
北京大学第六医院,北京大学精神卫生研究所,国家卫生健康委员会精神卫生学重点实验室 (北京大学),国家精神心理疾病临床医学研究中心 (北京大学第六医院),北京 100083北京大学第六医院,北京大学精神卫生研究所,国家卫生健康委员会精神卫生学重点实验室 (北京大学),国家精神心理疾病临床医学研究中心 (北京大学第六医院),北京 100083北京大学第六医院,北京大学精神卫生研究所,国家卫生健康委员会精神卫生学重点实验室 (北京大学),国家精神心理疾病临床医学研究中心 (北京大学第六医院),北京 100083
医药卫生
双相障碍抑郁障碍心境障碍问卷青少年版效度信度
bipolar disordermajor depressive disordermood disorders questionnaire for adolescentsva-lidityreliability
《中国心理卫生杂志》 2026 (6)
521-528,8
评论