首页|期刊导航|中国农村卫生事业管理|制度类型、就医选择与政府补助对多维脆弱人群的医保减贫效应研究

制度类型、就医选择与政府补助对多维脆弱人群的医保减贫效应研究OA

Effects of institutional type,healthcare selection,and government subsidies on poverty reduction through medical insurance for multidimensional vulnerable populations

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 探讨不同医保类型、医疗机构及政府补助对大病人群减贫效应的影响.方法 基于2018年中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)数据库,采用灾难性卫生支出测算及处理效应模型等方法开展研究.结果 新农合虽提高了参保人群就医意愿,但参保人群灾难性卫生支出发生率仍高达13.6%,表明大病风险处于较高水平;就医机构方面,相较于专科和综合医院,诊所的灾难性卫生支出发生率为9.4%,显示就医地点与疾病经济负担存在紧密关联;政府补助虽在一定程度上发挥共济作用,但对多维脆弱人群保障力度有限,65岁以上人群中,未收到补助的家庭灾难性卫生支出发生率高达24.2%.结论 不同医保制度在靶向保护方面需优化加强,根源在于基金池规模有限,制约了保障效果提升,提示需通过针对性改进建议,确保实现多维人群制度福祉的公平.

Objective To explore the impact of different types of health insurance,medical institutions,and government subsidies on poverty alleviation among individuals suffering from serious illnesses.Methods This study was conducted on the basis of the 2018 China Family Panel Studies(CFPS)database,utilizing methods such as the calculation of catastrophic health expenditures and treatment effect models.Results Although the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme(NRCMS)had increased the willingness of the insured population to seek medical care,the incidence of catastrophic health expenditures among the insured remained as high as 13.6%,in-dicating a significant level of serious illness risk.In terms of medical institutions,compared to specialized and general hospitals,clinics had a catastrophic health expenditure incidence of 9.4%,demonstrating a close relation-ship between the location of healthcare service and the economic burden of diseases.While government subsidies had played a cooperative role to some extent,their effectiveness in providing support for multidimensional vulnera-ble populations was limited.For example,among individuals aged 65 and older,the incidence rate of catastrophic health expenditures for families not receiving subsidies was as high as 24.2%.Conclusions Different medical insurance systems need to be optimized and strengthened in terms of targeted protection.The root cause lies in the limited scale of the fund pool,which constrains the improvement of protection effectiveness.This suggests that tar-geted improvement recommendations are needed to ensure the fairness of institutional well-being for multidimen-sional populations.

戈倩倩;王欣雨;苗雯青;史原翔;李叶

杭州师范大学公共管理学院,浙江 杭州 310000杭州师范大学公共管理学院,浙江 杭州 310000徐州医科大学附属医院杭州师范大学公共管理学院,浙江 杭州 310000杭州师范大学公共管理学院,浙江 杭州 310000

医药卫生

大病人群多维贫困灾难性卫生支出医保制度减贫效应政府补助就医地点

Population with major diseasesMultidimensional povertyCatastrophic health expendituresHealth insurance systemPoverty reduction effectsGovernment subsidiesHealthcare facilities

《中国农村卫生事业管理》 2026 (4)

236-244,249,10

国家自然科学基金项目(72174047,71874045)

10.19955/j.cnki.1005-5916.2026.04.002

评论