汉语普通话言语失用症评估诊断工具的编制与验证OA
Development and validation of assessment and diagnostic tools for apraxia of speech of Chinese Putonghua
目的 编制适用于汉语普通话的言语失用症(AOS)评估工具,并检验其信、效度. 方法 参考言语失用评定量表3.5版,结合汉语语言特征和临床经验,编制《汉语言语失用症评估诊断工具》(CAADT),包含语音、韵律和轮替3个版块共11个条目.邀请6名专家进行内容效度评议.选取2024年11月至2025年5月安徽省皖南康复医院(芜湖市第五人民医院)卒中后AOS患者51例(试验组),无AOS的卒中后失语症患者10例(对照组),采用CAADT进行测评.采用Cronbach α系数、Kendall和谐系数W和Pearson相关系数评估信度,采用内容效度指数(CVI)和Spearman相关系数评估效度,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析鉴别效能. 结果 CAADT语音、韵律版块和总量表Cronbach α系数均>0.9,轮替版块为0.454;评分者间一致性良好(W≥0.598,P<0.001);重测信度显示3个版块及总分两次测评结果均呈高度正相关(r≥0.84,P<0.001).量表整体CVI为0.95,各条目CVI≥0.83.各版块间Spearman相关系数为0.30~0.70.ROC分析显示曲线下面积为0.953,以11分为临界值,敏感性0.92,特异性0.90. 结论 CAADT具有良好的信、效度和鉴别诊断效能,可用于汉语普通话背景卒中后AOS患者的临床评估和辅助诊断.
Objective To develop an assessment tool for apraxia of speech(AOS)of Chinese Putonghua speakers and test its reli-ability and validity. Methods The Chinese Apraxia of Speech Assessment and Diagnostic Tool(CAADT)was developed based on the Aprax-ia of Speech Rating Scale 3.5,combined with the linguistic characteristics of Chinese and clinical experience.The tool consistsed of eleven items across three sections:articulation,prosody and alternating motion rates.Six experts evaluated the content validity.From November,2024 to May,2025,51 patients with post-stroke AOS(ex-perimental group)and ten patients with post-stroke aphasia without AOS(control group)were recruited from An-hui Wannan Rehabilitation Hospital(the Fifth People's Hospital of Wuhu),and tested with CAADT.Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's α coefficient,Kendall's coefficient of concordance W and Pearson correlation co-efficient.Validity was evaluated using the content validity index(CVI)and Spearman correlation coefficient.Dis-criminative effect was analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve. Results The Cronbach's α coefficients for the articulation and prosody sections and the total scale were all>0.9,while it was 0.454 for the alternating motion rates.Inter-rater reliability was good(W≥0.598,P<0.001).Test-retest reli-ability showed high positive correlations for the three sections and the total score between the two assessments(r≥0.84,P<0.001).The scale-level CVI was 0.95,and the item-level CVI≥0.83.The Spearman correlation co-efficients among the sections ranged from 0.30 to 0.70.ROC analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.953,with a cut-off value of 11,yielding a sensitivity of 0.92 and a specificity of 0.90. Conclusion CAADT demonstrates good reliability,validity and discriminative effect,which can be used for clinical as-sessment and auxiliary diagnosis of Chinese Putonghua speaking patients with post-stroke AOS.
倪天皓;毕思雨;戴媛;钱红;王勇丽;万勤;黄昭鸣
华东师范大学康复科学系,上海市 200062||华东师范大学中国言语听觉康复科学与ICF应用研究院,上海市 200062华东师范大学康复科学系,上海市 200062||沈阳城市学院,辽宁 沈阳市 110112安徽省皖南康复医院(芜湖市第五人民医院),安徽 芜湖市 241004上海市第五康复医院,上海市 201600华东师范大学康复科学系,上海市 200062||华东师范大学中国言语听觉康复科学与ICF应用研究院,上海市 200062华东师范大学康复科学系,上海市 200062||华东师范大学中国言语听觉康复科学与ICF应用研究院,上海市 200062华东师范大学康复科学系,上海市 200062||华东师范大学中国言语听觉康复科学与ICF应用研究院,上海市 200062
医药卫生
脑卒中言语失用症诊断评估汉语言语失用症评估诊断工具信度效度
strokeapraxia of speechdiagnosisassessmentChinese Apraxia of Speech Assessment and Diagnostic Toolreliabilityvalidity
《中国康复理论与实践》 2026 (5)
550-560,11
国家社会科学基金项目(No.20AZD125) Supported by National Social Science Fund of China(No.20AZD125)
评论