电针联合揿针治疗贝尔麻痹:一项基于面瘫严重程度分层的随机对照试验OA
Electroacupuncture combined with intradermal acupuncture for Bell's palsy:a stratified randomized controlled trial based on facial paralysis severity
目的:基于面瘫严重程度分层,探讨电针联合揿针治疗贝尔麻痹(BP)的临床疗效.方法:将220例BP 患者基于面瘫严重程度(House-Brackmann 面神经功能分级)分层纳入,随机分为观察组[中度 55例(脱落 5例),重度 55例(脱落 3例)]和对照组[中度 55例(脱落 1例),重度 55例(脱落 3例)].对照组采用传统电针治疗,主穴取患侧翳风、地仓、颊车、阳白、下关、牵正及双侧合谷,地仓与颊车及翳风与下关分别进行电针,每次 30 min;观察组在对照组治疗基础上联合揿针治疗,每次电针治疗结束后主穴予以揿针治疗,每日点按3次,24 h后移除;两组治疗均自发病第8天开始,隔日1次,每周3次,直至完全康复或持续至第24周随访期结束.观察两组患者痊愈时间,比较两组患者第 6、12、24周治愈率,评估两组患者基线和第 12周患侧表情肌肌群表面肌电情况,比较两组患者第24周联带运动的发生率.所有指标均在总样本中进行整体分析和按面瘫严重程度分层分析.结果:当考虑总样本时,两组患者第12周表情肌肌群均方根(RMS)比值较治疗前升高(P<0.01);第6、12、24周两组患者治愈率,痊愈时间和第24周联带运动发生率的差异均无统计学意义.根据面瘫严重程度分层分析:观察组重度BP患者第6、12、24周的治愈率均高于对照组(P<0.05);生存分析显示观察组重度BP的痊愈时间短于对照组(P<0.05);第 12周观察组重度 BP患者表情肌肌群RMS 比值高于对照组(P<0.05);第 24周两组重度 BP患者联带运动发生率的差异无统计学意义.两组中度BP患者第6、12、24周的治愈率,痊愈时间,第12周表情肌肌群RMS比值和第24周联带运动发生率的差异均无统计学意义.结论:电针联合揿针治疗重度BP的临床疗效优于单纯电针,可显著提高其治愈率,缩短痊愈时间,改善表情肌肌群肌力,且不会增加联带运动的发生率;而对于中度BP,联合疗法的疗效并未优于单纯电针疗法.
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of electroacupuncture(EA)combined with intradermal acupuncture(IA)for Bell's palsy(BP)based on the stratification of facial paralysis(FP)severity.Methods A total of 220 patients with BP were stratified according to FP severity(House-Brackmann Facial Nerve Grading System)and enrolled.They were randomly divided into an observation group(moderate BP 55 cases[5 cases dropped off],severe BP 55 cases[3 cases dropped off])and a control group(moderate BP 55 cases[1 case dropped off],severe BP 55 cases[3 cases dropped off]).The control group received traditional EA.Main acupoints included Yifeng(SJ17),Dicang(ST4),Jiache(ST6),Yangbai(GB14),Xiaguan(ST7),Qianzheng(EX-HN16)on the affected side,and bilateral Hegu(LI4).Electrical stimulation was applied to two pairs of acupoints(ST6 and ST4,SJ17 and ST7)for 30 min per session.The observation group received IA in addition to the same EA treatment as the control group.After each EA treatment,IA was applied to the main acupoints.Patients were instructed to press the embedded needles three times daily.IA was retained for 24 h and then removed.Treatment for both groups commenced on the 8th day after the onset,once every other day,three times per week until complete recovery or the end of the 24-week follow-up period.The recovery time of the two groups was observed.The cure rates at weeks 6,12,and 24 were compared between groups.The surface electromyography(sEMG)of the affected-side facial expression muscle groups was assessed at the baseline and week 12.The incidence of synkinesis at week 24 was compared between the two groups.All indicators were analyzed for the total sample overall and by FP severity stratum.Results ①When the total sample was analyzed,the root mean square(RMS)ratios of facial expression muscle groups increased from baseline to week 12 in both groups(P<0.01).However,there were no significant between-group differences in cure rates at weeks 6,12,and 24,recovery time,the incidence of synkinesis at week 24.②For patients with severe BP:The cure rates in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group at weeks 6,12 and 24(P<0.05).Survival analysis indicated a shorter recovery time in the observation group(P<0.05).At week 12,the RMS ratios in the observation group were also higher than those in the control group(P<0.05).The difference in the incidence of synkinesis at week 24 between the two groups was not statistically significant.③For patients with moderate BP:No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding cure rates at weeks 6,12,and 24,recovery time,facial expression muscle RMS ratios at week 12,and synkinesis incidence at week 24.Conclusion The clinical efficacy of EA combined with IA in treating severe BP(House-Brackmann grades Ⅴ/Ⅵ)is superior to that of single EA.The combined therapy can significantly improve the cure rate,shorten recovery time,and improve the muscle strength of the facial expression muscles,without increasing the incidence of synkinesis.Conversely,for moderate BP(House-Brackmann grades Ⅲ/Ⅳ),the combined therapy does not show superiority over single EA.
蒋阳;张丹;吴嘉龄;汤文达;徐孜鹦;顾静雯;熊健;张雯君;施惠敏
苏州大学附属张家港医院康复医学科,江苏 苏州 215600苏州大学附属张家港医院康复医学科,江苏 苏州 215600苏州大学附属张家港医院康复医学科,江苏 苏州 215600苏州大学附属张家港医院康复医学科,江苏 苏州 215600苏州大学附属张家港医院康复医学科,江苏 苏州 215600苏州大学附属张家港医院康复医学科,江苏 苏州 215600苏州大学附属张家港医院康复医学科,江苏 苏州 215600苏州大学附属张家港医院神经内科,江苏 苏州 215600苏州大学附属张家港医院神经内科,江苏 苏州 215600
贝尔麻痹电针揿针面瘫严重程度分层随机对照试验
Bell's palsyElectroacupunctureIntradermal acupunctureFacial paralysis severityStratified randomized controlled trial
《针刺研究》 2026 (5)
630-638,9
张家港市青年科技项目(No.ZJGQNKJ202231)江苏省老年健康科研项目(No.LSD2022020)
评论