首页|期刊导航|医疗卫生装备|高危前列腺癌大分割放疗中的HT与VMAT计划对比研究

高危前列腺癌大分割放疗中的HT与VMAT计划对比研究OA

Comparative study of helical tomotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy plans for high-risk prostate cancer hypofractionated radiotherapy

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:比较高危前列腺癌大分割放疗中螺旋断层放疗(helical tomotherapy,HT)与容积旋转调强放疗(volumetric modulated arc therapy,VMAT)计划的剂量学差异,为高危前列腺癌患者选择放疗方式提供参考.方法:选取2022年5月至2024年7月在某院放疗科接受前列腺癌根治性放疗的62例患者,为每例患者分别设计2种放疗计划,在安科锐螺旋断层放疗系统(tomotherapy system,TOMO)上设计HT计划以及在医科达Monaco放疗计划系统上设计VMAT计划.2种计划靶区处方剂量均为70 Gy,盆腔淋巴结引流区照射剂量为50.4 Gy,分28次同步完成.比较2种计划的靶区剂量学参数、危及器官受照剂量和单次治疗出束时间.采用SPSS 23.0软件进行统计学分析.结果:HT计划的靶区剂量Dmax 小于VMAT计划,靶区适形度和均匀性均优于VMAT计划,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001);HT计划的直肠V45、直肠V55、直肠V65、膀胱V50、股骨头V50、小肠Dmax均小于VMAT计划,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);HT计划单次治疗出束时间略长于VMAT计划,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:高危前列腺癌大分割放疗中HT计划在靶区剂量分布和危及器官保护方面均优于VMAT计划.对于需要照射盆腔淋巴结引流区的高危前列腺癌患者,可优先选择基于HT的大分割放疗计划.

Objective To compare the dosimetric characteristics of helical tomotherapy(HT)and volumetric modulated arc therapy(VMAT)plans for high-risk prostate cancer hypofractionated radiotherapy,so as to provide guidance to select a radiotherapy modality for patients with high-risk prostate cancer.Methods A total of 62 patients who underwent radical radiotherapy for prostate cancer at the Department of Radiation Oncology of some hospital between May 2022 and July 2024 were selected,and for each patient two separate treatment plans were designed:an HT plan using the Accuray Tomotherapy System(TOMO)and a VMAT plan using the Elekta Monaco treatment planning system.The prescribed dose to the target volume was 70 Gy for both plans,and the dose to the pelvic lymph node drainage area was 50.4 Gy,delivered in 28 concurrent fractions.The two plans were compared in terms of the target volume dosimetric parameters,doses to organs at risk(OARs)and beam-on time for single treatment.Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 23.0 software.Results The HT plan had the target volume dose Dmax lower while the conformity index(CI)and homogeneity index(HI)better than those of the VMAT plan,with the differences being statistically significant(P<0.001);the rectal V45,V55 and V65,the bladder V50,the femoral head V50 and the small intestine Dmax were all lower in the HT plan than in the VMAT plan,with the differences being statistically significant(P<0.05);the HT plan had the beam-on time for single treatment slightly longer than that of the VMAT plan,with the differences being statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The HT plan behaves better than the VMAT plan for high-risk prostate cancer hypofractionated radiotherapy in terms of target volume dose distribution and OAR protection.HT-based hypofractionated radiotherapy plan may be preferred for patients with high-risk prostate cancer who require irradiation of the pelvic lymphatic drainage area.[Chinese Medical Equipment Journal,2026,47(5):57-61]

韩永钢;王雯

淄博市第四人民医院,山东 淄博 255000淄博市第一人民医院,山东 淄博 255000

医药卫生

前列腺癌大分割放疗螺旋断层放疗容积旋转调强放疗剂量学

prostate cancerhypofractionated radiotherapyhelical tomotherapyvolumetric modulated arc therapydosimetry

《医疗卫生装备》 2026 (5)

57-61,5

淄博市卫生健康委员会2024年度淄博市医药卫生科研项目(20240903068)

10.19745/j.1003-8868.2026075

评论