中国三大城市群新质生产力发展水平测度及比较OACHSSCD
Measurement and Comparison of the Development Level of New Quality Productivity of the Three Major Urban Agglomerations in China
文章基于2011-2024年长三角城市群、京津冀城市群和珠三角城市群49个城市的面板数据,采用熵权法、核密度估计法、莫兰指数和Dagum基尼系数法测度分析中国三大城市群新质生产力发展水平及其时空演变与区域差异特征.研究发现:第一,三大城市群的新质生产力发展水平总体呈现不断上升趋势.第二,三大城市群新质生产力发展水平具有显著的空间相关性,呈现"高-高"集聚或"低-低"集聚的特征.第三,长三角城市群新质生产力发展水平的基尼系数低于京津冀城市群和珠三角城市群.第四,组间差异是三大城市群新质生产力发展水平差异的主要来源,其次是组内差异和超变密度.
Based on the panel data of 49 cities in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration,the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration and the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration from 2011 to 2024,this paper uses the entropy method,kernel density estimation method,Moran's index and Dagum Gini coefficient method to measure and analyze the development level of new quality productivity of the three major urban agglomerations in China as well as its spatiotemporal evolution and regional dif-ference characteristics.The results go as below:First,the development levels of new quality productivity of the three major urban agglomerations show a continuous upward trend.Second,the development level of new quality productivity of the three major ur-ban agglomerations has significant spatial correlation,and presents the characteristics of"high-high"agglomeration or"low-low"agglomeration.Third,the Gini coefficient of the development level of new quality productivity in the Yangtze River Delta urban ag-glomeration is lower than that in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration and the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration.Fourth,inter-group differences are the main source of differences in the development level of new quality productivity of the three major urban agglomerations,followed by intra-group differences and hypervariable density.
马翔飞
安徽农业大学马克思主义学院,合肥 230036
管理科学
三大城市群新质生产力区域差异核密度
three major urban agglomerationsnew quality productivityregional differenceskernel density
《统计与决策》 2026 (8)
11-16,6
教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(22YJC710079)
评论